Yesterday, NPR featured a piece on the Los Angeles School District, which is in danger of losing funding, or more accurately in danger of being told it's in danger of losing funding, if it doesn't, you know, sprinkle magic seeds on the ground and grow great stalks of pedagogical greenery which each student may climb to Utopic, well-paid, scholarly adulthood.
Read the story yourself. The consider the absurdity of these so-called market-based education reforms. Schools are meant to "compete" now. If they do poorly, students can leave. If they do well, students will flock. There will be choices. The market will work its magic. We shall become consumers of education, even prior to the conspicious consumption of the American higher-education boondoggle.
Except . . . what competition? What market?
You can't graft free-marketism onto a state monopoly. A failing school can't run advertisements, lay off nonessential staff, raise additional revenue by courting investors, offer discounts and specials, or any other tool in the belt of enterprise. Even a failing business has options to convince, cajole, trick, or lure in customers. Certainly failing businesses can get loans or grants or new infusions of capital to actually improve. But a public school is a public school is a public school. Those that are failing have no option but to continue to fail, however valiantly (or not valiantly) their staffs may fight. They can't get rid of their rotten students, or at least not efficiently and effectively. They can't acquire additional revenue.
In short, they face the punitive aspects of markets--loss of "customers," loss of revenue (funding), decline of phsysical infrastructure, decline in reputation, decline in quality of new hires, etc.--with no corrective measures available to them, except, of course, to appeal to the government for more money, which the government will withhold because the school is already failing, and you can't throw bad money after bad, or whatever.
We're the government, and we're here to help.
Friday, July 07, 2006
No School District Gets Ahead
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
to me, the most interesting aspect of that story was a defense of the school district--
so you want to move your kid to one of our better schools? um, ok, we'd be glad to have him/her, but we don't have any space.
just underscores another aspect of the free market fallacy.
The current system can't work, but then it's not intended to. It's just an incremental step en route to the GOP's educational "Holy Grail", which is a completely "privatized" school system that's tightly controlled by unaccountable churches but lavishly funded by the public.
Like the rest of the GOP's policies (and the party itself) the GOP's education plan is trapped between the late Middle Ages and the early Industrial Revolution.
Good point, Maximo.
Thrasy, I should probably stipulate that I think compulsory universal education is one of the great frauds of our time. It's absurd to compell unwilling students to acquire a general education for which they have no desire and no need. Of what use is such education in this country. Practically, it provides no useful vocational skills. Scholastically, it provides nothing of interest to the bright student, whether the future writer or the future scientist. The GOP's plan--I agree, more or less, with your assessment--is in the service of an even more preposterous idea: compulsory "private" education.
As a customer of the LAUSD, let me tell you it's quite distressing. Our oldest is currently enrolled at a Charter school -- a public school with greater parent involvement. I don't understand the difference between a Charter -- don't get me wrong here we are extremely happy with and specifically chose the school for it's non-traditional constructivist program -- and a private school. Last year the the we and the other parents had to raise over $200,000 dollars to support 'enrichment' non-essential programs like art, music, gym, dance and drama. Non-essential, don't get me started.
Still at 44% LA didn't test as poorly as other megapolises.
Post a Comment