Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Bomb Rahm.

"No!" say the gals at Firedoglake, ostensibly in response to their party bigwigs already yapping to the media: not-to-worry, we're not gonna do nothin' crazy. Or, in the thunderous prose of Christy Hardin Smith:

Let me get this straight, we have just taken back the House and, looking more likely as of this morning, the Senate, and Rahm's first priority is to shore up his power base and his ties to K Street.
Goodness, but they do stamp their feet. The Democratic Party is a huge, money-drinking corporate entity, so of course its first order of business is to reward the folks who write the bills (and the Bills), to keep the loud-mouth populism to a minimum now that the populus has had its say. Rank-and-file Democrats are like nothing so much as congregants who imagine their role in the call-and-response portion of the liturgy means that they're running the service.

The foot-stomping continues:
And I'm here to tell you right now that Henry Waxman had better be sitting in that committee chairman's seat overseeing the rampant war profiteering oversight, or there is going to be a world of shit headed directly at a certain ballet-dancer-turned-self-promoter's head. Some principles should not be sacrificed — and allowing big companies to steal from the federal government because you are hoping they will donate to your campaign coffers is not — I repeat NOT — acceptable. Period. So cross that off the list if it's there, it is non-negotiable.

If you think for a moment that those of us who just worked our asses off for a win are simply going to roll over and say thank you when you spit on us, you can think again.
I'm sure that's got Rahm Emmanuel and company all a-quiver. Of what mechanism, precisely, will the villagers avail themselves in this quest to right the wrongs perpetrated upon their honor? Yo, Christy, you've already voted. What're you gonna do, stay home in aught-eight? Your armory is empty, baby, and it's Rahm, the War Party, and the Credit Card industry who won this round, as they win every round, because they have influence and access, while you've got a loud-mouthed rabble who, in the end, always act predictably, always hold your nose, and always give the Complex what it wants. Don't tense your back. The shiv will slide in a lot easier if you just relax.

I ask myself: How well-attended will the next antiwar march on Washington be, what with the Dems happily jiggering the levers of power? Within the next few months, the Democratic party line will move along to smarter fighting, better occupation, more troops, timelines for those backwards Iraqis to get their shit in order. The firebreathing "antiwar" democratic blogs, meanwhile, will make like Echo and repeat the party line, since dissent might lead in two years to defeat. Like Echo, they're cursed by their own idolatrous longings. And who do you suppose that makes the Dems, you mythologists?

14 comments:

Justin said...

It is kind of funny, to me and no one else in all likelihood, that I read that same post today. I never go to that blog, but I happened to hit it up during my daily lunch hour surf. I had the same reaction. It is cute how riled up these donkeys are. I wonder how many of them, if any at all, will ever come to the realization that at some point they started believing their own bullshit and spin they once thought was an acceptable price for the sake of taking down the greater evil? You pimp bullshit artists for long enough and you eventually either become one or you get so used to it that you can’t smell it anymore.

I recall the same phenomenon during the 2004 election cycle. It didn’t take long to figure out that everyone (except Kucinich) was pro-war, they only disagreed on tactics. I attended a Howard Zinn speech shortly after Kerry won the nomination and during the Q&A session someone asked one of those rambling statement-with-a-sort-of-question-at-the-end questions. Part of his statement distinguished Kerry as the anti-war candidate. I felt compelled to stand up and correct him, pointing out that Kerry voted for the war and was still for it, he just thought he could manage it better. Zinn thankfully didn’t begrudge me the interruption and told the audience that an important discussion that was taking place and unfortunately they couldn’t hear it. I don’t know what the point of this is, I am clearly babbling at this point. I am just generally disgusted with politics.

No doubt the Democrats will continue supporting the war and serving corporate interests, to the eternal consternation and hurt feelings of the rabble who will, undoubtedly, keep electing them to stave off what they believe is a lesser evil. I’ll probably vote with them of course, but I won’t harbor any illusions about who Rahm spreads ‘em for.

Arthur Silber said...

Bingo! on the concluding paragraph (well, the whole thing actually).

As to your question: hmm. Zeus? Nooo. The crazy shepherds? Mebbe. Ohhhhhh! Narcissus, dying while he contemplates his own wondrousness and perfectitudity? Yah, that must be it.

Do I pass? Huh? Do I, do I?

Dawn Coyote said...

Howard Dean: Democrats won’t cut and run.

Arrianna Huffington: the President is still in charge of foreign policy.

ohioWfan on Free Republic: "A sweep of evil tonight has descended upon our country."

maximo said...

let us all just be glad that massachusetts grocery stores will not be selling wine.

Mr. X said...

Hmm. Maybe you should take a look at this Firedoglake thread, in which they make note of just how much Rahm's efforts to get DINOs elected failed. Or would that mess up your script too much?

IOZ said...

Hey Maximo: Move to PA, and then complain about state liquor laws.

Arthur wins the green carnation.

The System said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
The System said...

"Or would that mess up your script too much?"

It might, if you could explain how the success or failure of Emmanuel's electoral strategy has any bearing on anything at all now that the election is, you know, over and stuff (and his camp won anyway, I might add).

Our 29 new representatives, regardless of the extent to which their personal politics differ from the standard set by Emmanuel and the rest of the Democratic Party, only comprise 12.5% or so of the Dem now-majority.

They're as relevant as their willingness to tow the Party line allows them to be. No more, no less.

The "traditional" Dems, now comfortably suckling at the teat of power, no longer have any reason to seek the approval of the folks at Firedoglake, DKos, or whatever bastion of the much-vaunted netroots you care to name. Hell, they never really did.

After all, as IOZ glibly pointed out, what the hell are the FDL acolytes gonna do if they don't get their revolution, vote Republican in 2008? Or perhaps support the honest-to-dog progressive alternative they refuse to create, obsessed as they are with vanquishing "greater evils" by propping up lesser ones?

Man, ain't relativism a bitch?

Stickeen said...

Foot-stomping? Clever calculation, I think. There's a fine tradition, dating back to the Civil War, of making political hay out of war-profiteering; Truman and LBJ are notable examples. It's entirely plausible that Waxman will follow in those distinguished footsteps. I see Smith's post as an attempt to stake out a claim to an issue that Dems might actually do something about, so that later blogs can indulge in their typical ahistorical triumphalism. "See! We got them to pay attention! Fear the Netroots!" Note that Smith didn't point to any actually controversial issue that might result in a setback to the blogs. They've learned their Lamont lesson.

Stickeen said...

And, just a few minutes after that comment, I see this. The blogs have chosen their issue. Too bad it's not one that will make any difference to the world.

IOZ said...

Well, sticky, yes indeed. Yes indeed.

That's a rousing cry, isn't it? "War's are fun until they turn a profit!"

maximo said...

i'm not complaining. i voted in favor of the packie monopoly. maybe i'll vote the other way the next time they bring the issue up.

Handsome said...

Here's what I envision --

DEMS: We'd like to talk about withdrawing troops from Iraq, please. It's the Number One issue with our constituents. We can't win this war, the body count is unacceptable, it's an immoral occupation, we're hated by the entire world, let's get our boys and girls back home. It's a moral imperative. We need to do the right thing.

CHENEY (hiding his fangs beneath his cape) temdllr gllln gssssss.

DEMS: Eh?

CHENEY: (speaking up) TEN DOLLAR PER GALLON GAS. After we pull the troops out. Tell us when. We're standing by.{stares at Dems oh so hungrily with his deep red eyes)

DEMS: It... ah... we... did you say ten dollar per gallon gas?

CHENEY: Jesus. These numb fucks have no idea what we're doing over there. Georgie, get me my shotgun.

DEMS: Wait! Behind you! It's... N'yaarlahotep!

CHENEY: (whirling) POP! Wait --

(DEMS leave hastily)

Anonymous said...

Just Thought I'd Say Hi!!!!


I made an extra $2000 a Month Using this site!!