Monday, June 25, 2007

Wilfred Owen

Rod Dreher, the Crunchy Con Man, reads All Quiet on the Western Front and discovers that skepticism toward warmaking and a doubtful mind toward those who agitate for combat doesn't spring universally from absolutist pacifism. That a grown man with a family and career has just chanced upon this realization is indicative of something, but I'm not sure how to say it with derision appropriate to its cosmic stupidity.

And yet it's not so uncommon to hear adults, educated beyond most of their peers, relatively aware of Western history, reasonably well-read, and not prone in their daily lives to bouts of simplemindedness, express the utmost shock at the mendacity underlying the war in Iraq. Somehow, though almost every great work by current or former soldiers exposes the horror, cruelty, absurdity, and barbarism of war--the way it cripples the body and maims the soul if you survive--they have to be reminded again and again that warfare isn't a method of national therapy.

If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,--
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.

4 comments:

Ellen1910 said...

I rather admired Dreher's honesty. To admit -- and in public -- to being that untutored takes a bit of courage and might even be said to be a mark of leadership.

Unless, of course . . . .

Ultima Ratio said...

Did Rod Dreher just finish eighth grade?

IOZ said...

Yeah. Someone get that man The Red Badge of Courage!

Batocchio said...

Thanks, IOZ. Yeah, Ellen's right that Dreher deserves a few points for being more honest than some of his conservative brethren, and for finally getting a clue, as many of them stilly haven't (that New Republic article on the National Review cruise is both funny and scary).

Still, every time I hear a neocon opine, or other hawks, I have to wonder – were these guys awake in high school? Did they study no history, read no lit dealing with war, never talk to an actual vet? How can they be so goddam clueless? In between all the viewings of Rambo, Red Dawn, and Chuck Norris films, didn't they see Platoon, The Deer Hunter, Full Metal Jacket, Saving Private Ryan or any of a dozen other films at least once? War may at times be a necessity, but anyone who wants to go to war is a f**king moron. (It also didn't take a genius or advanced intel about Iraq to know in 2002 that the Bushies wanted to go to war.)

(By the way, Dulce et Decorum Est is one of my favorite war poems, and I'm overdue for writing on a few of them. So thanks.)