Friday, July 06, 2007

On the Moral Virtue of Jack Shit

Nine tenths of the evil and suffering in this world is rooted in the idea that something must be done. Why must anything be done at all? All the advocacy and protest in the world would pale in the face of practiced inertia. The way to confound the authorities is to sigh and take your time when they ask you to remove your shoes at the airport. The way to confound the terror-profiteers is to shrug and look for lunch. I am deeply inspired by the British who seem largely not to give a shit that some nuts tried to blow up something with a car. A nation of people who carry umbrellas on the sunniest days is a nation with an admirable relationship to fate. By failing to react, they have driven American conservatives into spectacular and hilarious conniptions, eructions of rage, howls, cries, squeals, belches of anger. It's a good show, and I'm jealous that I had no part in doing nothing to provoke it.

6 comments:

AlanSmithee said...

I wouldn't react either if I were on candid camera 24/7.

Prof. George Edward Challenger said...

Yeah, but Britain has a lot more practice ignoring the stupid shit as they've been under the fascist's thumb for a while. CCTV cameras, secret prisons for Micks, secret warrants (also for Micks), jackbooted thugs, occupied territories, etc.

BTW, love your flag. What does the 'archo' of Fagarcholibertarian stand for? Anarchist? If so, I'm reading 'Young J. Edgar,' by Kenneth Ackerman which tells the story of the Palmer raids and Hoover's role in them in a very evenhanded manner. You might be interested.

hipparchia said...

i took it that ioz is advocating for "rule by libertarian fags" but i could be wrong.

hipparchia said...

the very best reason for having large nanny-state government: it easily bogs itself down in infighting and minutiae, leaving no time or inclination for fighting wars. plus, all the money gets recirculated back to the taxpayers, either as welfare or cushy government employment, rather than ending up in the pockets of privateers.

bill clinton has a lot to answer for, leaving the government as a lean, mean, stripped-down fighting machine. with money burning holes in its pockets, no less.

frijoles junior said...

You guys are on to something, here. SMBIVA voiced a similar sentiment a few months back with his/her exhortation to "stop traffic" as a mode of resistance.

The effectiveness of this approach was illustrated by the relative success of a civil obedience campaign among Hungarian pot smokers a few years back. The powers that be have only so much time and manpower, after all. So, rather than bravely being crushed as a resistor, play dumb, drag your feet, and waste their time.

Passive-aggressive citizenship. Finally, something I can do about the state that fits into my busy schedule!

Dunc said...

Yeah, but Britain has a lot more practice ignoring the stupid shit as they've been under the fascist's thumb for a while.

That's one interpretation... Another would be that the stupid shit we've had years of practice ignoring was, in fact, a genuinely capable terrorist organisation. When you grew up with the PIRA blowing up shit left right and centre (including bombing the Tory party conference and launching mortars at 10 Downing Street), with actual proper explosives no less (often in very large quatities), then some bozo setting his car on fire just doesn't quite have the same impact.

I am proud to say that I greeted the news of the latest "attacks" with profound indifference. I mean, shit, can't people even build decent bombs anymore? Yawn...