Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Betray Us

I have so far failed to weigh in on the new Jesus, his fellaters and detractors. Let me just say this about that.

General David Petraeus is just one more Administration cum-junky, swallowing his pride because he hopes to get his in the end. He is neither the first nor the last. His much-lauded brilliance is mere coherence. His much-bruited honor is mere circumspection. His politeness is taken as point of moral character, but there are plenty of men, evil at heart, who say sir and ma'am. He got to where is he by spreading wide for his military and civilian superiors; he hopes to go farther, or at least further. The infamous MoveOn ad is a scandal not because it says too much but because it says to little. General Betray Us? A man on the make is incapable of betrayal.

4 comments:

Prof. George Edward Challenger said...

Rufus T. Firefly: Now that you're Secretary of War, what kind of an army do you think we ought to have?

Chicolini: Well, I tell you what I think, I think we should have a standing army.

Rufus T. Firefly: Why should we have a standing army?

Chicolini: Because then we save money on chairs.

Prof

Crusader AXE said...

Inside story is that this is pretty decent guy; very smart; very adept; good leader and, as is symptomatic of a lot of the military, infused with can-do. I've read what little there was to read that was readable, and I believe that both Crocker and Petraeus presented a grim picture. After a trillion bucks and $3Trillion, this should be a done deal. Instead, the fucking plumbing doesn't work. The entire imperial effort has smashed down in ruin, and the Army is standing there, trying not to have this turn into either the march of the 10,000 or Little Big Horn.

Comandante Agi said...

and the crowd shouted:

Crucify him!
Crucify him!

aww, brings me back to the good old days of Catholic grade school reciting the Passion during Lent.

isys said...

"but because it says to little."-needs edit.

What is meant by "A man on the make is incapable of betrayal"?
That such a person is by definition untrustworthy and therefore cannot betray?