Wednesday, September 05, 2007

I Pity the Fool

How do you solve a problem like Teresa? To call her an atheist, as Hitchens does, is reductivist and absurd. She did not "feel" the presence of god. So what? Nor do most believers, despite protestations to the contrary. The idea that the presence of god or grace is a sort physical, endocrine actuality within the human body is largely the belief of crackpot (which is not to say unpopular) protestantism in any case. Clearly Teresa believed there to be a god of some sort or other. To feel "forsaken" is inherently to grant existence to some remembering entity.

But the depth and duration of her doubt clearly undercut the argument that she was a believing saint living through a night of Augustinian doubt. It's fairly clear now that though she credited something or other with forgetting her, she was pretty certain that the whole Jesus racket was exactly that: a racket. And yet she was intimately a part of it, and no matter how deeply she came to suspect that the father, son, and holy ghost were at most colorful characters in a popular tale, she was not about to start telling the dalits that prayer was not the answer.

In the Post, Michael Gerson continues this month's tradition of misunderstanding Graham Greene, but quoting one of the famous lines from the unfamous Brighton Rock. Interestingly, the line was spoken not to a saint, but to a little murderer. For what that's worth. How it applies to Teresa remains a question. Greene's priest is talking about forgiveness for crimes of thought and action. Is Gerson implying that Teresa's disbelief was like murder? Perhaps. Who ever knows what he's trying to say.

In the end, Teresa woke up to this, at least. Jesus does not speak to us aloud in Wilts and Thous. But like many of us who wake in the middle of the night, she just kept her eyes closed, figuring that it was close enough at least to slumber. When she woke, she'd be a bit more rested than if she stayed up thinkin'. Given her dedication to the poor, it is difficult to say that her public dishonesty caused any particular harm, but given her PR value to the Church, it's hard to say she did much good either. Her life, like so many, ended in a wash, valuable only as a lesson that the price of unexamined doubt is unhappiness. No one who does so much small good for so many should die feeling herself to be a failure. That she did is a testament to something appalling all right, but it's not the mercy of god.

7 comments:

la Rana said...

Gerson always reads like he's been paid by a PR firm to give a pentecostal eulogy after a national tragedy.

"And there is a kind of courage in losing hope without losing heart."

Oh shoot me in the fucking eye.

IOZ said...

I loved that line. Those goofy inversions are always the best. "There's a kind of living in dying first but not dying fast." Or something.

Aaron said...

Hatred gives birth to malicious intent, but malice without reservation is the child of love.

Ellen1910 said...

We have a home for the dying in Calcutta, where we have picked up more than 36 000 people only from the streets of and out of that big number more than 18 000 have died a beautiful death. (1979)

Please, Sister; can't I have just one aspirin?

Huffy Henry said...

There is a kind of compensation in losing the help of John McConnell without losing your columnist's job.

Was that Atlantic Monthly takedown ever right...

bdr said...

What's despicable about this particular Gerson column is his implication that Teresa's devotion to her duty in the face of her crisis of faith is analogous to America's duty to continue its duty to the war Gerson propagandized for in the face of America's crisis of faith in Bush.

Crusader AXE said...

In a past incarnation, I was briefly Emperor of a large, faith-based non-profit serving the poor of the Greater Seattle area. I came to believe that one thing Christ said is definitely true --"The poor are always with us." I also came to believe that St Vincent de Paul was absolutely correct in saying, "The poor are difficult masters."

In the mega-sense, Teresa's care for the poor was useless, of course. However, that is the geopolitical thinking that gets you into messes. Not worrying about individuals get masses killed.

John of the Cross entitled his greatest work, "The Long Dark Night of the Soul" and William James discusses this loss in "The Varieties of Religious Experience"
and there is a tradition in Catholic theology and philosophy that makes Teresa very main stream. Thomas the Apostle, after all, doubted until Christ revealed himself...and, tradition has it, went to India where he was martyred.

I would rank her as a Christian stoic -- abiding by the principles and ultimately not expecting any reward. As such, I see her doing what Marcus Aurelius advised, loosely translated..."Things are incredibly fucked up. Anything you do, no matter how minor, is a good thing."

Of course, I write this as a practicing anti-theist, who advocates the cult of Tiffany the Singularity where God is antropromorphized as a hormonal, not so smart, vacuuous teenage girl who's into dildoes and Justin Timberlake, if that is not redundant. So, what the hell do I know...

In Hoc Signe!