Friday, October 26, 2007

Mahavishnu

Now, you may wonder if in the process of outsourcing my thinking I am losing my individuality. Not so. My preferences are more narrow and individualistic than ever. It’s merely my autonomy that I’m losing.

I have relinquished control over my decisions to the universal mind.

-Bobo Brooks
Wow, man. Whoa. And, like. This whole solar system might be, just, like, one tiny atom in the fingernail of some other giant being.

Folks, I am obviously no opponent of recreational drug use. Indeed, I recommend it. On the other hand, I've got precious little patience with those who make claims under the banner of, "It expands your mind, man." You know the sort. They believe that their cannabinoids, their tryptamines, their lysergic acid diethylamide don't simply jigger with the brain chemistry in interesting, unusual, sometimes frightening, sometimes eye-opening ways, but that these chemicals actually "break open the head," in the famous phrase, and expose the mind to the springs of the source of all understanding. In other words, they confuse the amusement park for the library, and therefore fully benefit from neither. I have had many revelations, I'll tell you, while smoking pot, and not-a-one of them held up in the harsher light of sobriety. That isn't an insult. I love me some roller coasters. But I accede to the transcendental limits of the experience.

I bring this up because similarly transcendental claims are often made by technologists. Glenn Reynolds and his squad of undersexed transhumanists indulge such fantasies, as do many writers of science fiction, people who use the term "singularity," and gadget enthusiasts like Brooks for whom technology is essentially magic--who look at a television, say, or worse an iPod as sui generis, impenetrable, and, to use the popular word, transformative. They could just as easily convince themselves that the path to enlightenment involved going to Africa and chewing on some iboga. Futurism and primitivism are two sides of the same counterfeit coin.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

A poster with the nic "slippedvoussoir" has a top-post over at Slate Poems on the "heteronormative patriarchy".

If "slippedvoussoir" ain't you, then you have reason to be jealous.

Ain't seen nothin like him/her since you left that vale of tears ...

jm said...

"Now, you may wonder if in the process of outsourcing my thinking I am losing my individuality. Not so. My preferences are more narrow and individualistic than ever."

As I was reading these sentences this morning I initially misread the very next sentence as "It’s merely my ability to think that I’m losing."

Silly me. I was presupposing Brooks has the ability to think.

Keifus said...

Great. So now when I get my dream job as a "futurist," I'm gonna feel all guilty about it.

I like science fiction well enough, but it's true you can draw a blurry line between the stuff that tells us about ourselves (using fun, smart, or outre props), and that which is pure wanking. Just like any other genre.

The Brooks article is lame, but in his defense (ugh), he's not being terribly serious. I can't help but wonder if I'd merely find it a mild diversion if someone else had written it. Sadly for him, the external mind thrives on context.

LA Confidential Pantload said...

WTF? The Brooks Borg Unit is telling us that resistance is futile?

Tristan said...

"...who look at a television, say, or worse and iPod as sui generis, impenetrable, and, to use the popular word, transformative."

Just wait until the Google implants. Then you'll see. Oh yes. You'll see.

As much as I enjoy mocking David Brooks and Glenn Reynolds, though, I don't think their flubbing around with shiny things invalidates the idea that, yes, mass media has, in some way, changed the way human beings operate*. Could you explain, for instance, not only what you just said but how you said it to your average educated 11th-century Confucian scholar? What about evolution, or planetary development, or the Big Bang, or online anime fandom?

I know one of the worst ways to perform an experiment is to rely on your own subjective experience, but it sure as hell seems like knowing that I'm a product of billions of years of evolution, not a sexually imperious white man's thunder-god, has not only affected the way I think but the way I act, and in ways that simply wouldn't have been open to me a thousand years ago.

*Although people have changed less than a lot of them would like to think. Political daddy-complex fetismism is just as popular in America and Iran and China and fucking Luxembourg as it was in Rome.

Anonymous said...

"Could you explain, for instance, not only what you just said but how you said it to your average educated 11th-century Confucian scholar? What about evolution, or planetary development, or the Big Bang, or online anime fandom?"

I would explain the last one to him thusly:

"All you need to know about online anime fandom is that you must devise a way to subjugate the Japanese in such a way that they never invent anime."

Ultima Ratio said...

Someone explained the Singularity to me once as that technological change which will so transform the human species that, post-Sing., they'll be in no way recognizable to pre-Sing. humanity.

My response: "oh, you mean agriculture?"