Thursday, November 29, 2007

And Another Thing

There appears to be a segment of the population that believes, prior to the year 2000 or so, that the United States was a secular paradise. Quite the opposite, obviously. We have long been a nation of religious yaboos. It's part of the local color. No religious test indeed. It took just under 200 years to get a Catholic in the oval office, and for most of those two centuries, anti-Catholicism was practically the national pasttime. There's still never been a Jew. There have been a couple of atheists, like Reagan, but they've kept it under wraps. Anderson Cooper clutching a bible and pestering candidates to aver their particular level of allegience is hardly something new. How do we know you won't take your marching orders from the Vatican, Mr. Kennedy? You know what I'm sayin?

You all know that I'm not exactly surprised by the Arcadian fantasies of the activisti, but Brother J and Posse in heaven, I am sometimes surprised by the fervor they inspire.

4 comments:

Comandante Agí said...

2008 is all about building a bridge back to the 20th century. The problem is deciding which decade to return to...

TGGP said...

I missed the part in the Constitution where it says on what basis you may choose your favored primary candidate.

I think if people got over their "democratic fundamentalism" (in Bryan Caplan's terms) they would see the problem more clearly and how ineffective many of their solutions will be. Of course my favorite candidate (Ron Paul) isn't going to win and if he did still wouldn't be able to accomplish all that much (though disagree with Stefan Molyneux on whether he'd be a disaster). It might very well be the case that there is no solution and the whole thing is simply absurd.

la Rana said...

You missed more than that, tggp. Like the enlightenment/founding idea that the state draws power from the people, not da utta way round. In other words, if it ain't there, we dooze what we want. But its an error committed by most of the "legal academy," so there's that.

TGGP said...

So does that mean the elephant candidates are having their freedom of religion restricted by the state via voters? My heart goes out to them.