Oh, fuck it. In the spirit of the Holiday Shopping Season, I guess I'll say something about IQ. Everyone is talking about it these days, mostly because Bill Saletan over at Slate (no link--find it yerselfs) waded back in with the novel argument that niggaz iz stoopid and ayzhins iz good at the violin. Now I have mentioned IQ in the past, derisively as is my wont, and some wisenheimer always pops in to intone somewhere between mournfully and triumphantly: "Actually, IQ is a remarkably accurate . . . " blah blah blah, making the hardly debatable point that the Intelligence Quotient is a remarkably good measure of the Intelligence Quotient. And the ancient cubit was a remarkably good measure of the ancient cubit, but you don't see anyone building tunnels under the English Channel using the damned thing. Given the enthusiasms of its supporters, it's perfectly obvious that IQ is the current equivalent of phrenology, and if anyone among you doubts that Will Saletan and Andy Sullivan would break out the foreceps and start measuring skulls and noses if some crackpot racialist told them it was back in vogue, then frankly, I should probably give up.
Anyway, IQ. Mine, for instance, is higher than Saletan's or Sullivans. Oh, yes, I was a "gifted" child, and for many years I demonstrated my extrardinary capacity to imagine what this shape would look like if folded that way without actually folding anything! Square pegs, round holes, color-coded memory games. Yes, children, I am the Ubermensch, with Pure Will where my ribs once were and a wound that will not heal and a line-item veto on the laws of nature. And yet here I am, mere blogger and smart-ass, small-potatoes administrator in the backwaters of the American empire while all around me you boobs with your meager 120s and your poor spatial reasoning skills are wheeling and hustling yourselves to more money, more influence, more more than I have or likely shall ever have. That isn't sour grapes. I like my life. My only point here is that IQ ain't Smarts, Smarts ain't Genius, and Genius ain't Success.
Why, you are asking yourselves, are guys like Sally and Sully so godfuckingdamned interested in proving that niggers are a lot of watermelon-eating, crack-smoking, welfare-cheating, baby-having, oversexed, underbrained perennial losers? Why can't they be more like the jooz? Or the Indians? Well in the first place, it's because they're both a couple of vicious racists who, unlike some crotchety remnant Klansman in some holler in the Carolinas, haven't even got the strength of conviction for their own bigotry and have to hide behind some second-rate eugenicist to validate their distaste for the nigra. Also, it's a penis thing. You will notice that the major proponents of these theories of inferiority are white men, and that for some odd reason, they are not threatened by admitting that the Slants are smarter than they are. Well, the White Women aren't at stake in that imaginary equation, are they? But in larger part and in the political realm, these are people who seek to invalidate the social policies of 20th-century American liberalism without blaming themselves. "We tried," you see, "But the damned rappers just weren't good enough." You can see the same narrative shaping itself in, say, Hillary Clinton's ongoing accounts of the failure of the poor, stupid Iraqis to take advantage of the marvelous opportunity we've given them. The failure of liberal social policy is not in question, but to question the actual reasons for such failure would necessarily be to call into doubt certain presumptions about the efficacy and capacity of the state in matters into which it has forcibly extended its purview. That, of course, would be intolerable. Better to blame the blacks. It's not like they ever put down the sweet tea and forties and read Slate anyway.
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Why Are They Allowed to Call Each Other Nigger, Part One Million
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
Yes, children, I am the Ubermensch ...
You too, huh? Fortunately we can't get together and make babies.
Speaking as a Fully Qualified Scientist, here's my standard rejoinder to the IQ obsessives:
Hey! You! IQ fan! You say you know so much about the brain? You say you're smarter than the rest of us? Then show me those skillz in brain science by inventing a new and better brain imaging technique, instead of lovingly polishing those IQ charts like a numerologist. Yeah, you keep claiming that IQ measures all around smarts. Well, if you've got so much all around smarts, go contribute something to neuroscience, and then we can talk about those IQ charts again.
Well, since it ain't the jooz that gave you them spatial reasoning skills, it must be the wops on your other side.
From what I've read, them Romans were pretty good architects and civil engineers.
Seems that the existence of even one nigrah who performs well on all-encompassing Stanford-Binet tests would dispel this "hypothesis."
(The fact that those not melanin-impaired are not too enamored of Preznit Harvard seems to speak volumes about relative intelligence)
Now find me a sober Mick, a generous Jew, or a Greek male who doesn't want to bend young boys over a rain barrel.
I dunno, man. Don't the libereals blame it on Reagan? And since when is Sullivan a liberal?
I think that Sullivan likes to think of himself as a "classical liberal," which is like Classic Coke, a revised version of junk food. He wants others to see him in the tradition of people like John Stuart Mill, though I think you have to have a brain to do that.
Why, i once tried an IQ test and i thought it was crap. I didn't finish it though. I just felt it was useless.
Even if it was an accurate measure of intelligence, it still wouldn't mean anything. It's like, the rabbit and the turtle run a race... You can be fast all you want, but if you're not even advancing much, it won't be of any use. And we all know a lot of supposedly smart people are wallowing so much in their own arrogance, they're the last guys you'd expect to actually use their brains...
It is posts like this that remind me of why I read your blog.
Thank you.
If white men were superior, they would have not need to construct and admininster measures and tests to "prove" it.
What's the difference between IQ, Smarts and Genius? The first one is at least defined as normalized score on a test by cohort, but the latter are kind of vague.
IQ doesn't just predict IQ, Linda Gottfredson has discussed all the things it predicts here.
I discussed the motivations of "human bio-diversity realists" here, though not to the satisfaction of all, as one person said of it "TGGP writes as if someone stuck a poker up his arse. Lighten up, dude", but hopefully readers here will not have that reaction.
Gottfredson's stuff is warmed over Bell Curve.
"If we consider that intelligence manifests itself in everyday life as the ability to deal with complexity, then it is easy to see why it has great functional or practical importance."
If we consider the stultifying author of such nonsense a moron, then it is easy to see why it should not be linked in our comments section. Also, what scruggs said.
Let's take a look at a different part of the equation: The concept of "race".
What is a "race", anyway? You can't say "skin color", because there are more genetic differences within those so-called groups than between groups. In other words, you'll find more genetic variation within the so-called Nordic peoples of Scandinavia than you will between a lawyer in Stockholm and a Masai herdsman.
The big, open not-so-secret secret is that scientists have never properly defined "race". If we can't define "race", then we can't measure the IQ of a "racial group". It's there unnecessary to attack the validity of IQ tests proving that some "races" are intellectually inferior (even though it's a lot of fun).
"Race" is a social construct, a politically convenient category, but NOT a scientific term. Any inquiry into "race" is just politics masquerading as science.
Mr. Saletan has said that "Latino" is a "race". That statement alone destroys his credibility as a commentator on this issue. "Latino" is a "race"? No, there are no "races", just racism. And what do you know, it's based on skin color. Color me unsurprised.
Post a Comment