Thursday, March 20, 2008

Les trois ours

The Post gives the two Donks too much credit, but whatever: Just what the hell is a responsible withdrawal from Iraq. The Post paints it à la three bears and asks for porridge neither too hot nor too cold, and that, in turn, paints to Post in fairytaleland. Since despite the best wishes of our humanitarian interventionists there is not yet any such thing as prophylaxis in war, I think an elementary fact bears repeating: withdrawal after insertion is precautionarily irrelevant, and your best bet, albeit still a lousy one, is haste.

8 comments:

Ashley said...

Hot stuff. Of course the Catholic basher in me wants to extend, as it were, the metaphor to the war-rhythm method. We just need to learn to count and take temperatures better.

Daniel said...

Awesome metaphor.

Anonymous said...

The lapsed Catholic in me finds the confluence of events this Holy Week - 5th "anniversary" of Bush' Folly, the Vernal Equinox, a full moon, and that nasty bit of business in Tibet - a sad harbinger of conflagrations to come.
Sooner than later.
The ridiculous perversity of the mainstream news coverage of the first development cited would ordinarily be as unbelievable as the Christ actually turning water into wine. But we live in dissilient times.
Still, Hill-Obama are going to bring the troops home.
TT

TGGP said...

The best piece on withdrawing from Iraq comes from Greg Cochran.

stephanie g said...

Trusting a guy to pull out never, ever works. I think that means Iraqis need to poke America in the ribs before he gets too excited. Or something.

Montag said...

Q: what's the difference between Iraq and a light bulb?

A: you can unscrew a light bulb.

[rimshot]

Professor Coldheart said...

If these metaphors are the order of the day, then I have a newfound respect for Candidate McCain. "Stay [in] for one hundred years," indeed ...

Anonymous said...

metaphorically speaking, a burned out light bulb can be analogized to a lawnmower which is no longer in working order

in the parable, the owner reproached the neighbor for having borrowed and broken it

not so, replied the neighbor - first of all, you are confusing me with the neighbor on the other side, who was the one who actually borrowed it

secondly, it was already inoperative when i got it

finally and conclusively, i returned it in good condition

the application of this hypothetical example to the issues of reparations and eventual fair trials for war crimes (if any) is left as an exercise to the reader

mistah charley, ph.d.
imissfaf.blogspot.com