Full-bloodedness is an old coin that's gaining currency in the new American realm. Meaning: Politics may no longer be so much about race and gender as about heritage, core values and made-in-America. Just as we once had and still have a cultural divide in this country, we now have a patriot divide.Blood equity?
Who "gets" America? And who doesn't?
The answer has nothing to do with a flag lapel pin, which Mr. Obama donned for a campaign swing through West Virginia, or even military service, though that helps. It's also not about flagpoles in front yards or magnetic ribbons stuck on tailgates.
It's about blood equity, heritage and commitment to hard-won American values. And roots.
Some run deeper than others, and therein lies the truth of Mr. Fry's political sense. In a country that is rapidly changing demographically - and where new neighbors may have arrived last year, not last century - there is a very real sense that once-upon-a-time America is getting lost in the dash to diversity.
We love to boast that we are a nation of immigrants - and we are. But there's a different sense of America among those who trace their bloodlines back through generations of sacrifice.
Meanwhile, immigration trends have shifted drastically in the past 40 years, as growing percentages of Americans are foreign-born. In 1970, just 4.7 percent of the total population was foreign-born - 9.6 million people. By 2000, 11.1 percent, or 31.1 million individuals, were foreign-born, according to the Census.
Contributing to the growing unease among yesterday's Americans is the failure of the federal government to deal with the illegal immigration fiasco. It isn't necessarily racist or nativist to worry about what these new demographics mean to the larger American story.
-Kathleen Parker in Der Stürmer
It's actually the "necessarily" in that last sentence that brings the grim smile to my lips. Quel caveat, eh? Obsession with
27 comments:
"Generations of sacrifice." Yeah...I really believe that the typical right wing pundit comes from a long line of strugglers.
hehehehehehe. this is funny. and thinly veiled, like a fresh spring roll at a thai restaurant. you've gotta love the eugenic alchemy undergirding it all. let's boil it down:
ain't no nigger gonna be president o these here yewnighted states.
there, that's better.
pierogies and kielbasa are like part of my DNA, man. you can pry my laktas from my cold dead eastern euro-centric hands, man.
and whatever you do, don't tell her how coconuts made their way onto the Hawaiian Islands.
i renounce my "blood equity, heritage and commitment to hard-won American values. And roots." how dare she say i'm more patriotic than the average brown person who come here for a 'better life.'
and, Mr.Fundamental: What? A swallow carrying a coconut?
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
Wait, are Italians white?? Since when? How about Catholics?
It's hard to keep track.
My Pakistani friend actually got called 'colored' at a wedding in Tennessee last weekend. At least it was in the midst of a complement. (I believe the exact phrasing was, "you're quite pretty for a colored girl." Cue spit-take.)
What year is it?
So, no blacks, and obviously no muslims, and none of teh ghey, and no skirts, and no godless atheists, and no one even vaguely foreign. It's darn luck that so many white male protestants run for public office or there'd be no one to vote for.
Isn't the article referring to Americans of generally European descent who's technology coupled with basic concepts of human nature forged the country, vs Americans who think everything they've been given is an entitlement and will always be there?
Is, for instance, France not in some peril of becoming in this century a nation of African and Asian immigrants who can sweep the floors in the Louvre but not identify with a single painting on the walls?
Is, for instance, France not in some peril of becoming in this century a nation of African and Asian immigrants who can sweep the floors in the Louvre but not identify with a single painting on the walls?
Nope! Thanks for playing.
Sacre bleu!
But...I see teevee shots of rioting suburban brown folks. And some soccer players are not pure blooded Frenchmen (because we know there is such a thing as a pure French population of unified white ethnic background). And, you can hear the muzzein's call in the City of Light!
Ioz...I am afraid to click the link on his profile, as I am posting from work.
the writing on the wall is in fact. . .like. . .just graffiti, man.
lol.
That "vs" in thehangedman's post really threw me for a loop.
Heretofore, I had thought that
a)
Americans of generally European descent who's[sic] technology coupled with basic concepts of human nature forged the country
and
b) Americans who think everything they've been given is an entitlement and will always be there
...were one and the same group. You don't suppose that hangedman was trying to slip in a coded reference to, uh, colored people, do you?
I am a member of a) (at least 3 mayflower folks in the woodpile) and can't remember doing much of anything except collect a paycheck for the last 35 years.
Come to think of it, those brown guys laboring in the 100 degree heat outside my office window sure look like a bunch of slackers to me.
Makes me wonder what "basic concepts of human nature" we are talking about here...
Americans of generally European descent who's[sic] technology ...
...that would be my technology (not the inferior other's) because someone with more of my acknolwedged genetic material somewhere back sometime had a hand in its creation?
The near constant attempts to explain why racism isn't, in fact, racism, reminds me of theists trying to explain why theism is not irrational. One side has a fairly logical argument, the contours of which have been slowly hammered out over the years, while the other side employs a complex series of obfuscations and misdirections, just confusing enough for the unscrupulous (i.e. nearly everyone) to think there is some sort of "truth in the middle."
..that would be my technology (not the inferior other's) because someone with more of my acknolwedged genetic material somewhere back sometime had a hand in its creation?
I know you're being sarcastic there, anonymous, but just to spell out the answer to your rhetorical question:
Oh, of course -- like Arabic numbers, printing, gunpowder, paper, etc.
la rana, babe: "racism isn't racism" does not correspond to "theism isn't irrational."
FWIW, I'm not so sure that theism is any more "irrational" than atheism. There's a rather vast area of human experience and cognition that is neither rational nor irrational, and rationality itself rests (so to speak) on the non-rational.
Sure, "racism is racism" (a tautology that Ayn Rand could have followed). The question is, what racism is. There's not a clear, unambiguous definition of the term, any more than there is of socialism, capitalism, atheism, theism, or sex. That's what makes it possible to obfuscate these issues. Watch scientific racists (or their fans) denying vehemently that they're scientific racists, for example.
Sure, Frau Parker (*whinny*) is talking racism there. But rather than play dueling definitions with her and her ilk, I try to be prepared (as IOZ evidently is) to explain why what she's saying is historically and socially uninformed.
Ask and thou shall receive!
if fair is fair... since i'm not american in the real sense of the word, i think kathleen ought to petition the irs to return my tax payments.
Maybe my $189 I am getting back to "stimulate" the economy is "really" because I, despite yet more Puritan heritage (somewhere in the Anglo-German mongrel background there is William Bradford, first Governor of the Mass. Bay Colony, I'm told)am not appropriately American and do not "get" it.
Promiscuous: I agree with your eloquent rejoinder in that I don't fully agree with the 100% reductionist/materialist view of reality, yet I find the Judeo-Christian theology of the ilk of Ms. Parker pretty repellant. Pretty church buildings and cool choral music aside.
All of human history, someone once said, is naught but the migration of tribes.
Well, now, that's a nice way of putting it. The Cherokees and Choctaws migrated to Indian Territory, no doubt to find a better life, eh.
His (X) mark
pookapooka
Anyone who thinks Europe is about to go Muslim should read God's Continent. GNXP has a good post on it here.
The near constant attempts to explain why racism isn't, in fact, racism, reminds me of theists trying to explain why theism is not irrational. One side has a fairly logical argument, the contours of which have been slowly hammered out over the years, while the other side employs a complex series of obfuscations and misdirections, just confusing enough for the unscrupulous (i.e. nearly everyone) to think there is some sort of "truth in the middle."
Similarly cars remind me of planes. One travels on the ground, while the other makes its way through the air.
Whose rationality indeed!
Brian, just because you or I find something "repellant", that doesn't mean it's irrational. Scientific racism is pretty rational, in the 'garbage in, garbage out' sense, but I find it repellent. A good many other people don't. That has nothing to do with rationality.
Consider homosexuality. Is it rational? (I'm not one of the queerfolk who think homosexuality is inborn, but that's not relevant to the question. A good example of irrationality, though, would be those people who think that EITHER homosexuality is a choice OR it's inborn.) I don't think it is, but that doesn't mean it's IRrational, or that it's therefore bad. That many people find homosexuality repellent doesn't make it irrational, or wrong. The same applies to heterosexuality, of course.
Mark, I can think of plenty of good reasons not to believe in gods, and no good reasons to believe in them. That's why I'm an atheist. I'm not at all sure, though, that I became an atheist for rational reasons, nor did most atheists I know of. There's an awful lot of bad reasoning among atheists, as well as ignorance, misinformation, and simple bigotry. While that won't make me take up theism, I'm always skeptical when atheists start waving rationality around. Declaring oneself rational doesn't make it so; Ayn Rand is a paradigm case.
Promiscuous Reader,
I see that I interpreted rana wrongly. It wasn't clear to me at first glance that the statement "a fairly logical argument, the contours of which have been slowly hammered out over the years" is necessarily a stand-in for anti-racism, as it's not at all apparent to me that certain racist formulations are, strictly-speaking, illogical (or without a history). I think rana thinks that the logic of a proposition is also its accuracy.
I agree with you that he's also confused as to what rationality is.
promiscuous: I think we agree.. I never claimed that repellance equals irrationality, I was just expressing my distaste for a particular form of religion, that's all. :) Heck, Christianity IS somewhat "rational" if one buys the underlying ideas. Those ideas are pretty awful to me, but that's my prejudices showing.
Anyone who thinks Europe is about to go Muslim should read God's Continent
Hmmm.... I'm not sure there's a big overlap between "people who think Europe is about to go Muslim" and "people who are capable of learning something from a book". Otherwise, good suggestion!
"Sure, "racism is racism" (a tautology that Ayn Rand could have followed)." So, ---done already, just ask Gertrude Stein.
Post a Comment