Who Is IOZ?: Colorwheel

Friday, June 13, 2008

Colorwheel

Well, enough of you haters complained, and that's the reason for the B&W. The Mighty IOZ bows to public opinion. And that's the kind of change that we . . . need.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...: All right!

Gimme some of your coke. Bring it to my front door, while dressed like Santa Claus. Chop chop!; 9:37 AM
NutellaonToast said...: people complained that you were usinga style the doesn't hurt their eyes?

Weird.

People are stupid. White on black is so much better; 10:54 AM
First Little Pig said...: Egad nutellaontoast you are mad. White on black is so very much easier to read and there are studies to back it up. I was forced to change my preferences to black on white during IOZ's first color shift (which he did, thankfully, improve). The black on white is fantastic.; 10:59 AM
Brian said...: All hail our mighty host. I, too, enjoy the black on white. My aged, pre-digital age eyes definitely prefer this!; 11:29 AM
Leonard said...: You are the change we've waited for!; 11:32 AM
Mr.Fundamental said...: I prefer some color.

a lighter color background with darker text. you've got to pick the right color though.; 11:36 AM
Kevin E. said...: Always choose style over substance! Although my eyes are going, the exotic look of the old page was a stimulating change from the moyen sensuel look of the other blogs that open up, I am told, at the rate of one every two seconds....

As Mr. Fundamental noted, though, there is a compromise available. I'd vote for that, if we were voting. Though there's been enough voting about everything lately!; 11:54 AM
nit said...: Perhaps the comment section will be easier on the donkle from here on. After all, we can now sympathesize more with seeing the world in black and white.; 1:47 PM
puppylander said...: geez. it's so stark in here. j/k.

how about a little ego-stroking... i'd read this blog even if it was white on white. i would go out of my way to cut and paste into word and re-color the text.; 2:35 PM
someone sitting at a desk said...: LCD vs CRT: energy-wise, LCDs use a constant amount, but CRTs do not. A study looked at an 18-inch CRT and found 102 watts when the common Black-on-White but 79 watts when White-on-Black.

Cornea-preference wise, I bet there's a marginal difference, as well; 8:10 PM
incgnfcnt said...: i liked the old colors
black and white is okay, just kind of gives a weird tint to the voice of the blog; 4:13 AM
puppylander said...: are you seriously telling me that there's such a thing as eco-friendly web design?; 8:04 PM
M. Pyre said...: It's a lot like Obama's transformation to the Purest Whiteness.; 10:35 AM
IOZ said...: Everyone's a critic . . .; 2:35 AM
Dunc said...: Much better, thanks! :); 8:34 AM
Druff said...: I liked the brown =/; 3:16 PM

Friday, June 13, 2008

Colorwheel

16 comments:

Axis Mundi

About Me

Hypocrites Lecteurs, Semblables, et Frères

Archive