I can hardly add to Saint James of Ocicat's note on smut, such as smut is, but he mentions The New Yorker, and I would like to say this about that:
Can you recall anything that you've read there that wasn't authored by Seymour Hersh in the last five centuries or so? I think I recall seeing an essay by Adam Gopnik, but the wistful fog was so thick that I initially mistook him for John Updike, adpoting a pugilist's stance at the retirement castle. House fiction is scarcely less lamentable, hewing as it does to the McEwan school of No Knocks. Had there been no attacks on 9/11/2001, the magazine's decline might have been reversible. Alas, alack, The New Yorker seems actually to have believed all that shit about the New Seriousness and the End of Irony, which may be read as a cautionary tale in Taking Yourself Too Seriously. Spiegelman's black-on-black tower's might have been read as twin tombstone's for the rag's sense of humor and sense of self-proportion. The continued practice of laying an umlaut over the second O in words like "coöperate" is too precious by three-and-a-half. Is it meant to indicate the elision of a hyphen? What is Hendrik Hertzberg? Why is David Denby?
Monday, June 09, 2008
Talk of the Clown
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
That 'umlaut' you refer to is actually a diaeresis. It's the old school way of indicating the pronunciation of both vowels in contrast to a diphthong.
I actually think it's more stylish than the hyphen, but that's just me.
Maybe they're still having the heebie-jeebies from the Tina Brown era? Nobody could accuse the mag of being too serious in those days....
-- sglover
The official humor - shouts and murmurs and the cartoons - are, I would argue, as good as they've ever been. And the books section still rules. I cancelled after realizing that Sedaris, Menand and the funnies were all I was reading anymore.
Well, off the top of my head there was the ketchup article, a number of articles on particular medical syndromes, with the Lesch-Nyhan article standing out.
Also the attack on pennies, which is cliché but excused by my blistering hatred of them.
For me, the New Yorker is the best source of well-written articles about random shit, and I like it for that.
Sir James is going to find himself on fewer invite lists to the parties in Manhattan that matter, should he continue in the vein he has been mining of late.
To wit, he's been on fire!
I have two years' worth of NYorkers gathering dust. I keep thinking I'll get to the back issues on the next long weekend. Or, that they'll make for good summer reading. But....
It reminds me of the current Yankee squad, all decked out in their pinstripes. They look good, but their record continues to hover at .500.
May be time to check out the Mets.
Mike
Oh dear---the end of irony? Is that formaldehyde we smell?
They have pretty good movie reviews. That's about it, though.
The last five centuries also includes A. J. Liebling in the mix, but he's kind of fallen off a bit since 1963.
Suggestions?!
If you are denigrating New Yorker and Vanity Fair, where should I get my news, commentary, Sedaris??
I cancelled Esquire, and stopped reading Rolling Stone a looong time ago. Time, Newsweek, US News should be used in a class on the decline of written press.
The papers?! C'mon. I still get the Times, but even then its mostly to read and keep current on the inane arguments of the Ed and Op-Ed pages.
Foreign Affairs is too expensive, and Harpers' too expansive.
Help!
anon 7:33: that guy on the corner with the cardboard sign? a modern town crier.
he's not just talking to himself, you know.
I don't think "tower's" and "tombstone's" mean what you think they mean. Or am I missing something?
The guy who wrote the Wisdom of Crowds has done some interesting articles there. He also bitch-slapped Levy and Peart in the comments at Overcoming Bias (the best blog in the history of ever). The recent Jared Diamond one about the New Guinean who spent years and killed over 30 people to avenge his uncle was good. "The life of the Pathan is thus full of interest".
Nice, I was just talking shit about that umlaut (diaresis be damned, full speed ahead) the other day: http://rottenindenmark.vox.com/library/post/cross-your-ts-and-dot-your-is-and-os-and-es.html
And the NYer is actually OK sometimes. They published a great takedown of the whole 'serial killer profiler' field that pretty much called them Quantico palm-readers. Other than the one good article per week, though, it's as ignorable as a fucking Brian Eno B-side.
Awesome, because I thought there was something wrong with me when I found myself reading only Talk of the Town (and the first 2 articles at that), Anthony Lane's movie reviews, and the tiny cartoon that moves from page to page.
Post a Comment