Thursday, July 03, 2008

Idiocracy

A former law professor who has spent much of his career as a behind-the-scenes bureaucrat, Mr. Medvedev showed a wide-ranging knowledge of foreign and domestic issues, confidently answering questions for 90 minutes without notes and speaking at length without stumbling. The president, who is 42, spoke only in Russian but did not need an interpreter to understand questions posed in English.

-Reported in the Times
One notes that this description is fairly run-of-the-mill for non-Anglo national leaders. I mean, hell, I could talk fluently for 90 minutes about politics, speaking at length without stumbling, and could take and respond to questions in two languages without interpretation, although my responses in French, my second language, would lack native fluency. To be able to discourse for an hour or two on the content of one's profession hardly seems like a superlative qualification; more like a prerequisite-to-hire. Yet Americans persist in their surprise at finding other people and their various leaders and potentates to be less . . . moronic than we are.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

I dunno- he seems pretty... elite

Anonymous said...

If Medvedev worked for NBC, Bush would mock him:

The Washington Times' Bill Sammon described Bush's press conference with Chirac:

Turning to Mr. Chirac, [NBC's David Gregory] added in French: "And, Mr. President, would you maybe comment on that?"

"Very good," Mr. Bush said sardonically. "The guy memorizes four words, and he plays like he's intercontinental."

"I can go on," Mr. Gregory offered.

"I'm impressed—que bueno," said Mr. Bush, using the Spanish phrase for "how wonderful." He deadpanned: "Now I'm literate in two languages."

See! One can be bilingually inarticulate and brag about it!

drip

Thomas Daulton said...

But you see, I could never have a beer with Medvedev. He probably only drinks that expensive Vodka sh#t which I can't afford. Or Goldschlager, I bet he drinks Goldshlager. So therefore, he's not a good international leader and I can't support him.

Mr.Fundamental said...

eh.

I'm never that impressed with claims of mental retardation as exhibited in or by the general populace and/or leadership, because it reeks of "we can do better than this." we don't want them to do better, we don't want them to do anything. I'd vote for a warm bowl of tapioca ala Calvin and Hobbes. of course this seems to be a personal tick of yours, but you're setting up the argument, it seems, to throw more money at public education or whatever, as if it's important. I don't see "ignorance" or "incompetence" as much as I see just a general lack of caring and motivation. we don't want professional politicians, we want fucking idiots. and of course, I find droning on and on, even as competent as I am at what I do and what I understand, while qualifying me for my job or role or whatever, is really effing boring. there are a hundred things I'd rather be doing than talking the talk. this is also why I hate NPR. . .competence, droning on and on, and having an articulate mission, such is their wont, when it comes out through the radio, really grates on my nerves. I don't want their world to make any more sense to them than mine does to me. NPR "fits" for so many, because it was made to, and I don't want to fucking hear about it.

of course, blogging is masturbation, so there's that.

and yes, I guess that means I'm pro-idiot.

MandT said...

Meye alkte goodye!

Crusader AXE of the Lost Causes said...

We have smart, intelligent, and articulate people in public life. Who either stay that way and get slammed to the wall in the NASCAR Endurance Race/Demolition Derby that is American civic life, or dumb their message down to some level that just annoys everybody.

The reason the JFK remark about the gathering of Nobel Laureates and other intellectuals in the White House being the greatest assemblage of intellectual horsepower ever assembled there except for when "Thomas Jefferson dined alone" is effective is because it's frankly true. Exactly what other presidents have we had who were polymaths and brilliant? Adams might qualify, except he was insane. Lincoln was a brilliant orator and thinker, but not particularly well educated. Help me out here...JFK was like Roosevelt, second rate mind, first rate personality. The two brightest people we've seen in the White House in the last 100 years by far are Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. And, that went so well...

I'm starting to come around to the idea that we are a nation of madmen, best led by obsessive compulsive psychopaths. The people who should have been president and didn't lately include people like Mario Cuomo, Gene McCarthy, Gore, Kerry, Moynihan and so on. Instead, we've had the clown college.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of idiocy:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/digby/591076402104313910/?a=13224

I'm protesting having to work today, so I thought I'd have some fun tweaking the Digybites.

Anonymous said...

people who should have been president and didn't lately include people like Mario Cuomo, Gene McCarthy, Gore, Kerry, Moynihan...hhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Anonymous said...

That Bush/Chirac press conference piece is absolutely astounding. I would be dismayed to hear that sort of childish sarcasm from a candidate for 8th-Grade class president, much less the U.S. President. Does anyone *really* know how a fucking asshole like that got to be President?

The Promiscuous Reader said...

He stole the election. Remember?

Christopher said...

the promiscuous reader: You mean he stole the election that Nader won for him.

mr. fundamental: Well... I don't know. I think George W. Bush is really just incredibly fucking stupid, and yet I don't see how that has benefited anybody.

I suppose it could be argued that a smarter President would be better at hiding, say, his love of torture, but the fact that Bush's evil is out there for everybody to see hasn't actually been much of a factor in stopping it.

We've had idiots running the country for a while now, and I just doesn't seem to be working very well.

Brian said...

christopher: I don't see the people behind the Bush Administration as "idiotic" in any way. Bush is just a figurehead for a collection of interests that have been served very well by the past seven years. The Administration has NOT been a disaster for these interests, but a boon.

I'm not sure the brilliance of our Buffoon in Chief really matters. Power and money wins, and said power and money will ensure that what they need happends.

Anonymous said...

mr. fundamental: "we don't want them to do better, we don't want them to do anything."

yes, that's the solution. let's try to get the most incompetent, lazy, unmotivated fucking idiots we can find to run our government. that'll really help us to survive the global climate disruption crisis and the global extinction crisis.

IOZ said...

The solution! Oh-ho, is that what we were talking about.

Anonymous said...

You mean he stole the election that Nader won for him.

90,000 Greens in Florida voted for Ralph. 200,000 Democrats in Florida voted for Bush. As usual, the donkeys fucked themselves up, but you can just go fuck yourself.

Brian said...

Anonymous: the argument that a vast bureaucracy in Washington totally dedicated up to this point to waging war and promoting eternal "economic growth" at all costs will be able to do anything to really help us "survive the global climate disruption crisis and the global extinction crisis" is questionable.

Anonymous said...

I have the Bushism quote on my fridge from the press conference after he met with JC Juncker, the PM of Luxembourg (at the time he was President of the EC.)

When asked what Bush's impression of Mr. Juncker was, Bush repsonded:
"He's a piece of work...wait, that might not translate so well...can I call you a 'piece of work'?"

Juncker is too polite to return in kind. And much, much smarter...l'etat c'est fucked!

A Differnt Matt said...

Salute your solution!

"I seem to think I think I got a little situation
So listen to me sister listen maybe you can help
I think I gave a lot of problems my consideration
But not for me they always seem to be for someone else

Why all the people always seem to just be on vacation
What do I get from never touching anything at all
I'm like a trash can holding all the information
And every single time I'm in the field to be taught

Salute your solution, now, salute your solution

I find myself just looking worthy of my best intentions
Ignoring any kinda pause I might receive at all

All others seem to find a road that's tough to satisfaction
I find a ridicule that isn't cool for me at all

And if there's one little answer to this complication
Someone somewhere some help me settle what is on my mind
There's only one I'm only taking getting and receiving
There's only one I'm taking
And only one I'm taking

And only one I'm taking
And only one I'm taking
And only one I'm taking
And only one

I find myself just looking worthy of my best intentions
Ignoring any kinda pause I might receive at all
And all the others seem to find myself a satisfaction
I find a ridicule that isn't cool for me at all

But if there's one little answer to this complication
Someone somewhere some help me settle what is on my mind
There's only one I'm only taking getting and receiving
There's only one I'm taking
And only one I'm taking

And only one I'm taking
And only one I'm taking
And only one I'm taking
And only one"

As told by the great philosopher Jack White.

Mr.Fundamental said...

what were we talking about?

I've been listening to Bob Marley all morning, on our day of revolution, fwiw. nobody gets me on my block.