"I believe in personal responsibility, I also believe in faith [sic]," Obama says. I believe in faith? I believe in belief. And I speak by talking! Tautology has always been une langue diplomatique for the ruling class, like French in the days before the Anglo ascendency, allowing our various princes and tsars and kings and emperors and plenipotentiaries of all types and stations to yammer at each other in ballrooms while the good earth yields up famines, blights, and the occasional public execution--to break the monotony, you know? Still, the now-universally requisite affirmation that one believes in the inherent value of credulity when it comes to the notion of a supernatural order, whether that involves millions of gods and the closing of the Kali Yuga or one-slash-three and the thousand year kingdom of Christ Risen on Earth, well, it's good for a grin and giggle, anyway.
As for personal responsibility, alors, I think we all know what it means: poor people are bad, and bear the burden of their own undoing, or lack of doing, or whathefuckever. This, from someone who has faith in belief and belief in faith, is a curiously un-Christian notion. Did not the various Jesi of the Gospels aver inherent virtue in poverty? The mean and wretched shall inherent the kingdom; the meek the earth; et cet'ra, et cet'ra? I'm not no believin' man myself, but I do recall some shit about camels, needle-eyes, rich men, and heaven.
Well, whatever. As the good book says: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. Si se puede!
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Romans 13:1-2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
lot of voters like their God like they like their gumnint: omnipotent, omnipresent and invisible (different sense than transparent.) still not sure how 'personal responsibility' fits into that little scenario, though.
i believe in solidarity (among groups somewhat smaller than nation-states) and Truth, (but that's neither here nor there.)
"As for personal responsibility, alors, I think we all know what it means: poor people are bad, and bear the burden of their own undoing, or lack of doing, or whathefuckever."
Confused by your link relation b/w personal responsibility and faith -- I thought it stated a belief (sic squared) that government could not replace individual parents' responsibility to assist in educating their kids. Reading the blog for awhile now...enjoyable, huzzah, and the like, but can't figure out the less is more, more is less theme when it comes to government. Then again I assume the answer will be "you're just calling em like you see em" which is fair, except in this case it seems a bit of a stretch.
- COT
Look on the bright side: at least it's hard to lie when you're spouting tautologies. I'd rather someone tell me that "maintaining permanent bases in Iraq is sustaining military habitations in the Land Between the RIvers" than hear that "maintaining permanent bases in Iraq is our gift to the Iraqi people, and anyway, we're pulling out [psst: Company 49 of the Fighting Wiener Cookers! jinx ten!] next year."
"Personal responsibility" is another dog whistle. It's the polite way of telling the niggers to move to the back of the bus.
My comment was the polite way of saying "mocking the word belief in the second clause of the sentence made much more sense when it wasn't then used to connect it to the first clause".
-COT
I think the cult of personal responsibility is faith. Quadruple tautology. Amazing politician.
Tautologies and logical contradictions can take you a long way in life.
Uttering contingent truths is a risk not always worth taking.
From the Times article:
“Look, let me talk about the broader issue, this whole notion that I am shifting to the center,” he said. “The people who say this apparently haven’t been listening to me.”
I can't say I really disagree with him; he's always been a centrist fucker.
On the other hand, he's really ramped up the moron talk lately. He wasn't nearly so odious during the primary.
So everybody's right! Give me kind of a warm feeling inside.
But, he noted, he does not believe that the active hand of government is a replacement, say, for parental responsibility in education.
What the hell does that even mean? I know that it's pandering to the righties, but does it actually have any content besides that? Like that shit about believing in faith means "I love religion!". It's a fairly simple declaration; it's pandering, but you can parse it as though it actually had content.
But... I mean... is the government gonna come into your house and read bedtime stories to your kids or something?
As for "faith" I always hear people prattling about how important and awesome it is, but I've yet to get an explanation about what good it is. It seems to me that, if the two are equally easy to get, proof is always better then faith.
This blog sure looks a whole lot better with its new format.
But, he noted, he does not believe that the active hand of government is a replacement, say, for parental responsibility in education.
What the hell does that even mean? I know that it's pandering to the righties
Say what? Lefty anarchists want the active hand of government on their kids?
The "replacement" verbiage is alarming, however. I would have much preferred he had said "I do not believe that the active hand of government should get within 500 yards of any human being, child or adult."
Well, of course he's only going to offer up vapid bromides. His whole schtick has been built by leaving a single word hanging in the air ("hope," "change," "beer," "reacharound," etc., etc.)and leaving it up to the lumpen (actually, more to those who fancy themselves the intelligentsia) to color in the space inside the lines
So I'm fuckin' this guy in the ass, right, and he says to me he says, Hey, buddy, how about a little reacharound, and I'm like, whaddareyoo? Some kinda fag?
Post a Comment