Loyal Donk Netrootsia is panicking. Three months out and tied in the national polls is a fine place to be, but heaven descend and forbid, they seem to believe that unless Barry O. goes nasty, they're gonna get shit-kicked out of Ohio and PA, thus consigning America to four more years of death-penalty-loving, war-starting, corporate-purchased executive dictatorship. Unlike the death-penalty-loving, war-starting, corporate-purchased executive dictatorship of the Community Organizer, who, like John Kerry before him, had some actual, palatable beliefs (Kerry was a serious anti-war activist) prior to discovering Ambition. (As my buddy tggp pointed out recently in comments, Obama's time in the community served principally to convince him that he'd be better off going to Harvard Law.) Although the prospect of a McCain presidency appeals to the part of me that wants civilization to burn to the ground so that we can all return to the pre-agrarian human norm--hunting, gathering, and occasionally trippin' balls--I must admit that a.) I think McCain is considerably less insane than he's obliged to appear for the actually insane voting base of his party, and b.) I still don't think he's going to win. A textbook case of Follow the Money, one need only observe where the hedged bets of Wall Street et al. are higher. This season the big money's backing Obama, and with Republican rule having pushed the mortgage sector of the finance economy toward what will surely become receivership, i.e. nationalization, not to mention all the other lousy economic news of late, the big dawgs of State Capitalism need some calmer heads to preserve the veneer of the free and independent market, someone graceful, less prone to constantly stumbling through the 4th wall.
Honestly, though, I, like friend Dennis P., usually find myself slyly rooting for a Donk victory just to watch the crummy bastards eat shit while Barack & Joe threaten Iran, send the Marines into Pakistan, ramp up the Drug War (uh, "reestablish relationships with fiends in allies in our own backyard"), advocate for the death penalty, jack around with Social Security, increase the size of the military and the scope of its responsibilities, expand the police state fix the mess that is Homeland Security, dither and prevaricate on social matters relating to The Homosexuals, pass a patchwork of mostly unfunded mandates in order to appear to be doing something about health care, and so on and so forth. Of course, Obama could yet ascend to the throne and prove to really be some kind of Muslim Communist, in which case I will be thrilled to be proven wrong.
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Burn down the disco . . . hang the blessed DJ
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
30 comments:
you cite the best reason yet to root for a Donkle victory (watching "the crummy bastards eat shit...").
still, you may be underestimating the role race is yet to play in this last best most important election ever.
but, who the hell can call these things?
i would have lost big money had i bet with my beliefs (and the odds?) that the country could not elect a bush three times in a sixteen year span. four, perhaps, had it not been for crazy ross.
ronald
love how you use the 4th wall reference to invoke the metaphor of election/politics as theatre. is there a name for that literary device?
while Barack & Joe threaten Iran, send the Marines into Pakistan, ramp up the Drug War...
Don't forget about investing in "clean coal" technologies and offshore oil drilling!
love how you use the Smiths Panic reference to invoke the metaphor of election/politics as "music that they constantly play (which) says nothing to me about my life," is there a name for that literary device?
i suppose the device was 'subtlety' until folks started splaining all the jokes away.
re: the police state. the 'resource officer' (cop who patrols the halls) at the local high school tasered a girl a couple of years ago to break up a fight. my oldest will enter that school in the next presidential term. what will an expansion of this policy entail? hey, maybe my company will get the contract for the new campus guard tower! wait, still doesn't matter if i vote or not, does it?
I think McCain is considerably less insane than he's obliged to appear for the actually insane voting base of his party
I think a better formulation is that he's insane about fewer things than his voting base. On war and conquest, he is genuinely as deranged as they are. And at least Obama / Biden would be likeliest to only shove me into an oubliette over drugs, rather than over drugs or being a cab driver for a suspected terrorist or using birth control or engaging in actual scientific research, or whatever else the handlers of Anointed of Jeebus Palin, who now have McCain's testicles in a jar on their desk, would come up with. How's that for a ringing Ass endorsement?
Also:
who, like John Kerry before him, had some actual, palatable beliefs (Kerry was a serious anti-war activist) prior to discovering Ambition.
Don't you mean, "prior to igniting the unholy altar of his ambition"?
What is it about Monsieur that causes so many to want to measure their pseudo-intellectual dicks against his? Is there a name for that?
I also enjoyed the reference to McCain breaking the fourth wall.
Intellectually, I also share Perrin's opinion of wanting to see the Dems win so we can all have fun with the blatant hypocrisy. But imagine the carnival entertainment if McCain wins. The Netroots would be apoplectic. Pass the popcorn, etc. If only both could happen, somehow...
For me it's "unholy lust," paul, but as IOZ is gay I am forever doomed to wave merely a metaphorical pseudo-intellectual dick in his direction, and god knows that's not enough.
Pairing unholy lust with Paul kills. Is there a name for that literary device?
Yinz're funny.
Pathos, love. Pathos.
hey, i'll admit i have the smallest pseudo-intellectual dick around here. i mean, i have to look up every third word in IOZ's posts before i can reply.
after Paul's comment, i feel like i came to the circle jerk and got hit with friendly fire.
Isn't that the reason you go to the circle jerk? Or maybe that's just, uh, me.
I, for one, show up to hold the cookie.
teh sircle jirk:
1 of we iz doin it rong.
I was shooting for the fourth wall.
Okay, this pseudo-intellectual dick unilaterally declares paul the winner.
A round of polite applause, then cakes and tea for us all.
mds:
Was your 2:23 post meant to be taken seriously?
Was your 2:23 post meant to be taken seriously?
Oh, lordy, obviously not. If James Dobson actually had a jar of testicles on his desk, he'd look like one of his own caricatures of a depraved homosexual. And I doubt either McCain or Palin could even spell "oubliette."
Isn't that the reason you go to the circle jerk?
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Of course, if McCain and Palin win, we'll all be executed. On the other hand, we wouldn't have to listen to her sing the National Anthem at the Super Bowl...
And sometimes a flute is a flute.
(See Palin's "talent" portion of her pageant days.)
mds:
Thanks, but I knew the handlers didn't have McCain's testicles in a jar on their desks. I meant the part about McCain shoving you into an oubliette for using birth control. The rest seemed fairly realistic so I wondered why that was included....
I meant the part about McCain shoving you into an oubliette for using birth control.
Oh, wait, seriously?
(1) John McCain endorsed South Dakota's draconian no-exceptions abortion ban;
(2) his campaign just released an ad attacking Obama for wanting to warn kindergarteners about sexual predators, by tying it to the horror of early sex education;
(3) Sarah Palin opposes comprehensive sex education (as we have seen) and shares the "no exception" mindset toward abortion; and
(4) the powers of the Religious Right who ordered McCain to pick Palin have a long record of hostility to contraception, including opposition to Griswold v. Connecticut.
So, taking that all together, why not presume just for fun that they'll effectively recriminalize contraception for the hoi polloi via SCOTUS or the policy of federal agencies? The Bush administration has already added rules classifying contraception as abortion, allowing "moral objection" to be invoked by health-care providers being paid out of the public purse. Oh well, we'll need a lot more homegrown troops to support that invasion of China anyway.
But all that is a drag, sorry. I usually turn to IOZ for the attitude of snarky dismissal, not for boring policy points.
So, taking that all together, why not presume just for fun that they'll effectively recriminalize contraception for the hoi polloi via SCOTUS or the policy of federal agencies?
Because "they" can't do anything other than sign the bills?
Um, last time I checked, neither SCOTUS appointments nor setting internal rules for executive agencies requires "signing of bills." Jeez, didn't you ever watch Schoolhouse Rock upside-down and backwards?
You know, I didn't actually read your post. Watching millions of Americans swarm CVSes for Trojans might be enough to get me to vote for McCain.
Then, anonymous 4:18, you are an utter moron.
On the other hand, watching millions of Trojans swarm America for CVSes might be enough to get me to vote for Ralph Nader.
Post a Comment