Rather, most of the votes that Mr. Obama actually loses belong to well-meaning whites who believe in racial equality and have no objection to electing a black person as president — yet who discriminate unconsciously.Dear Nick,
“When we fixate on the racist individual, we’re focused on the least interesting way that race works,” said Phillip Goff, a social psychologist at U.C.L.A. who focuses his research on “racism without racists.” “Most of the way race functions is without the need for racial animus.”
For decades, experiments have shown that even many whites who earnestly believe in equal rights will recommend hiring a white job candidate more often than a person with identical credentials who is black. In the experiments, the applicant’s folder sometimes presents the person as white, sometimes as black, but everything else is the same. The white person thinks that he or she is selecting on the basis of nonracial factors like experience.
-Nicholas Kristof
Maybe those whites don't believe quite so earnestly.
Caucasianally,
IOZ
11 comments:
The earnestness that comes into any belief is irrelevant. It's still just belief.
When did beige go out of fashion. I need to update my vitae.
Yea, it's the same thing that is wrong with the 2% of blacks who vote for whites...
Uh, who are the other 98% voting for?
I'm sure he meant rethuglicans, it just came out "whites".
I take high offense to the assertion that I lack earnestness in my support of the darkies!
The Importance Of Being Earnest
If a white man says he is without racism, he deceives himself, and the truth is not in him. All have fallen short of the glory of the fabulist's utopia of the communitarian aboriginal. As Obama himself noted in his Sermon On The Mountebank, e'en though the Right Reverend Wright was wrong, he is nonetheless black, and hence cannot per se be "racist", any more than a sheep can be a goat, Because of Slavery, (white*) America's Original Sin.
*The white slavers' African trading partners, who typically made it unnecessary for the whites even to stray from their seaside camps in order to fill their human cargo-holds, were simply creatures of time and circumstance. They and their descendants were not Born Into Sin, as are the Anglos, because the Anglos' day on top of History's Hill is more recent, and worst of all, succored by capitalism and Judeo-Christianity.
Yeah, well... that's just like... your opinion, man.
I much prefer Judo-Christianity. it's a lot more badass.
booyah!
Wow, Inkberrow, it's quite rare to meet such a nasty racist. Oh, wait, this is the internet. By the way, Obama didn't say that Wright couldn't be racist because he is black.
IOZ, this is a marvellous post.
I just happened to stumble across Mr. Nasty's post while trying to leave you a complement.
Gee Tim, it's quite rare to meet such a sanctimonious conformist. Oh wait, this is the Internet. Fresh over from gladhanding and rending prayer garments at Daily Kos? I'll bet the facetious send-ups and sarcastic hyperbole practically spring from the keyboards of you and other prog Ward Cleavers. Sorry about this, but JEHOVAH! JEHOVAH!
Finally, Tim, my guess is that no matter how much you stumble, you'll never ever manage to complement IOZ. You just don't write well enough.
Post a Comment