Insofar as I wish to see civilization destroyed and the great cities of the world covered in vines, I guess you could call me a fan of smaller government, but on the other hand, conservative invocations of Martin Niemoller In Re: the matter of the progressive income tax is pretty fucking . . . fucked. "First they came for the super-rich, and I did nothing . . ." As a Homosexual-American, let me assure you that not all 8 hot cut inches on Manhunt manifest in those precise proportions in real life. Likewise the belligerents in the class war now crawling out of the wirework to inform Glenn Reynolds of the impending danger to their two-fiddy a year on top of a million in payroll are not to be fully trusted. I mean, can you give it to me in cash? My concern, and I'll have to check with my accountant on this, is that it might bump me up into a higher . . .
Anyway, Reynold's army of John Galts (pray: come, let us snicker together), a gang of pencil-neck Sharper-Image shoppers with dreams of mountain redoubts and rough sex with heiresses, petulantly proclaim that they will . . . well, they do not seem to be proclaiming that they will stop the engine of the world. Rather, they will consider slowing it marginally, like union slugs caging an extra five minutes on every smoke break in order to stick it to Management. The irony. Oh.
In an era when Alan Greenspan goes apostate on the hoary Randian doxologies, invoking her, uh, economics is a move akin to threatening that you will stop the flow of the Spice. Fine and well, but a fiction. The idea that the willpower of Chief Exec alone, his lonely, Olympian struggle to master the means of production, impelled industry along was already outmoded by the time she transferred all those scratchings on the prison wall of her mind to the page. Rand's heroes and heroines are never seen conducting real business because Rand had no idea how a business works. The business of business is mundane, not heroic. Steel doesn't roll by pronouncement.
My favorite correspondent over at Reynolds' is the doctor who swears he will stop curing the ill if Obama is elected. He and his family will go out into the woods and live like wild dogs, foraging for food and hunting in packs, rather than allow that Socialist Obama to, uh, lower their standard of living. I mean, I laughed at liberal avowals to move to Canada back in aught-four, but this is just ridiculous.
Via Roy Edroso
Tuesday, November 04, 2008
My Heart Knows What the Wild Goose Knows
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
24 comments:
Rand's heroes and heroines are never seen conducting real business because Rand had no idea how a business works. The business of business is mundane, not heroic.
The whole "all the corporate execs will run off to some hidden valley, then you'll be sorry" concept never fails to bring to mind the meetings of Golgafrinchans in Hitchhiker's Guide.
The doctor is quite a find, Ioz. I almost ruined a keyboard!
This comment sent to Instaputz had me cracking up:
I've been reading with great interest your theories on "going John Galt". I've not read Atlas Shrugged yet, it's sitting on my nightstand with a bookmark about 5 pages in, but I think I get the general gist of it. Perhaps there's more reality in the book but the idea seems preposterous, no matter how appealing it might be to join such a quiet revolution. Successful people can't just turn off their success DNA. They need it beaten out of them. And while I agree that Obama's policies will begin the slow turning of the screws, we're far from getting the beatings. No, successful people crave success, not money, although that often comes along with it. It's part of their "being" to be successful. To think that people can shut that off is as silly as thinking poor people will stop being lazy if the government provides for them.
Pretty much sums it up, no? These guys (and they are all guys, right?) can't even get past page 5 of their inspiration's book. I guess you can't make people slog through it, you have to beat them into it.
While wholly in agreement on your assessment of the Randites I call misread on the woman. Her heroes were engaged in extremely boring, mundane, labor intensive activity much of the time; and your "by pronouncement" line could be a direct quote from any number of her more clever villains. This is part of why I find "AS" a failure as a novel; it's boring. And while touting a peculiar American exceptionalism, it was a vaguely defined sort without root in politics or anything but individual accomplishment and responsibility; her heroes took up arms against the American government. One of the three "perfect men" in her opus took up arms against the US government. The others "refused to vote" and even participate as tax/funding by removing themselves from the scene.
The notion of IOZ disagreeing with these ideas disagrees with my gut.
Greenspan has been senile for quite some time now. He thinks Rand is an institution.
I like the dude that says, "I'm in my mid-forties and run a company employing 124 people. Yes, I make more than 250K a year and pay out more than a million in salary and benefits." A mil in salary and benies split b/w 124 people comes to an average of 8k each. Mighty generous Mr. more than two-fity k!
I just want a conservative pundit to nail down exactly where the "Socialism" line is. Now, I know having the government take over large corporations is A-OK, so it's gotta be the tax rate that does it. We've got it narrowed down to somewhere between 35 and 39%, where 35% is "okay" and 39% is "socialist/fascist/commie nightmare", but I want specifics. Is it 37%? 35.2%? Is it okay to make over a quarter million dollars a year if you're being taxed at 36%? Or at that point, should you just say "fuck it" and become a philosophy-quoting fry cook? I mean, I gotta know how to plan out my life.
Wow, a bunch of moron martyrs holding a gun to their heads and crying “Stop or I’ll shoot”. The line of “thinking” seems to be; I’ll just quit or work less, that’ll show them.
Of course then the slack will just be picked up by harder working, hungrier, less-greedy people and employment and opportunity will actually improve, but don’t tell them, that’ll be our little secret.
I love this gem; “Furthermore, remember that the top 1% of Americans pay 40% of taxes. If that 1% leaves for a greener pasture, won't revenue from income tax drop by 40%? What then?”
Uh, you’ll all be replaced?
You see Ayn Rand, I see Mel Brooks. Blazing Saddles is underrated.
In an era when Alan Greenspan goes apostate on the hoary Randian doxologies,
Greenspan went apostate on Rand when he became head of the Federal Reserve, or before that. Like Rand or hate her, his tenure at the Fed was hardly Randian.
The notion of IOZ disagreeing with these ideas disagrees with my gut.
I don't know why, Ashley. While it appears that Ioz has read Rand, he obviously has a complete misunderstanding of her philosophy. I'm not surprised because Rand was everything that Ioz is not, most specifically---lucid.
The recent unravelling of the economy is exactly what Rand predicted would happen if the government persisted with its crony corporatist mixed economy. The quickening destruction of civil liberties is clear evidence of ever increasing scorn for the individual.
Ioz criticizing Rand. That's rich.
The recent unravelling of the economy is exactly what Rand predicted would happen if the government persisted with its crony corporatist mixed economy.
It's also exactly what Marx predicted if capitalism was allowed to run its course. The fact that one of someone's predictions turned out to be accurate does not necessarily mean that all their ideas were exactly right.
Never buy a utopia from someone who admits that they know nothing about human psychology.
Ioz criticizing Rand. That's rich.
A kid commenting on Who is IOZ! That's cute!!
It's exactly what the Bible predicted. It's exactly what the Aztec priests predicted if we didn't continue to feed human hearts to the Sun God. It's exactly what the Reverend Moon predicts if we don't all obey him. So f&&^% what.
A is A b1chez
And Helping is Futile.
When little Maggie asks for the bottle, do you know what she is saying? She's saying, "I am a leech".
Fixed: Never buy a utopia from someone who demonstrates that they know nothing about human psychology.
"...a gang of pencil-neck Sharper-Image shoppers with dreams of mountain redoubts and rough sex with heiresses...
Um, didn't Sharper Image file for bankruptcy...?
that just means plenty of bargains for the John Galt shoppers.
It also just proves that the masses are unworthy, given that there must not be enough John Galts to keep the glorious chain afloat.
Galt's Gulch, Gone Outa Bihness.
I have heard my more, um , Randian friends say things to this effect, and it really confuses me.
Where are they going to go?? They want a country that is less socialist and less taxed than the USA.
Any suggestions? I'd like to tell them where they can go, but haven't thought of a good example of their Randian utopia.
http://www.angryflower.com/atlass.gif
Any suggestions? I'd like to tell them where they can go, but haven't thought of a good example of their Randian utopia.
Somalia, Ethiopia and Afghanistan.
Low, low, low taxes and no government sticking its nose in your business.
No welfare queens.
Rugged individualism for everyone!
I'll even pitch in to buy the fuckers airfare, so long as it's one-way.
cb - awesome!
ryanto - yeah, that's all I could think of too.
For full disclosure, I made good on my promise to move after 2004 and now work in a g-d socialist EU country.
I plan on moving back next year, and offered my spot to my friends who aren't happy with Marxist Obama. I warn them I get state-run health care though. And people here think unions are still OK.
Post a Comment