On the one hand, I am very fond of fucking. On the other hand, what is it with all you faggots wanting me to fuck you without a condom? Of course, I understand that barebacking is a hot porn genre at the moment--after all, mere fornication no longer titillates; prurience can't exist without taboo. That said, AIDS is, like, totally real y'all.
Most curious: many would-be barebackers seem to have a deep, Victorian confusion about the difference between pathology and hygiene. "Are you clean?"--in the parlance of our times. This is in part a euphemism, but only in part. My partners, especially (unfortunately) the younger ones, seem to understand HIV as the sole provenance of the old and decrepit, and since I shower daily, maintain my obliques, and look like I'd charm your protective Jewish mother, ergo I cannot possibly be HIV positive. Well, I'm not, but know this only because I play safely and get tested. But I've also had sex with hundreds of different men, and being well-scrubbed is not a factor to consider here. Yes, we live in a first world country--for now, dudes, for now--with access to retrovirals etc. etc. blah blah amen. "AIDS is no longer a death sentence." Right, but even if such state indefinitely obtains, it still really, really sucks.
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Roll Over, Randy Shilts
Labels:
Faggotry,
Health Care
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
35 comments:
So, is casual sex really all its cracked up to be?
How shallow do you have to be not to acknowledge that the access to retrovirals etc. etc. blah blah you enjoy was bought and is maintained at an enormous price by others who believed they had a responsibility to protect you and the freedom to bareback?
I call Montag on the preemptive win.
sigh.
hundreds?
You men are all the same.
The retrovirals are the bugs not the drugs. Dunno if access to that is something you actually want to "enjoy." Though barebacking is a good way of ensuring it!
yes, well.
But I've also had sex with hundreds of different men
A gentleman never kisses and blogs.
Yes, yes. Needless to say, Aaron is right and that should read antiretrovirals.
Well-scrubbed, chiseled abs and hundreds of partners...so, IOZ is actually Jake Shears?
What's all this about riding horses without a saddle?
I have often thought that most of the commenters here view you as some amorphous, idyllic character. But, in practice, they actually cannot fathom that you are, if one is to believe your writings, in fact as gay as can be. Gloriously! I am certain that your devotees are cringing at the thought of you fucking hundreds of men. Me, I dunno. Whatever. And, yes, of course, AIDS is terrible.
Hundreds. Why not just say thousands? If we're just picking numbers...
Anonymous 9:25
amorphous? no, i've always thought of IOZ as having a definite physical form.
i'd also hazard that most of the pro-IOZ commenters have enough of a philosophical commitment to personal liberty that his glorious gayness and astounding tally of sexual conquests probably don't phase them too much.
Actually, alansmithee, "barebacking" refers to having sex without a shirt on. I saw a picture of a barebacker in the Advocate once. Shocking!
Montag, it's quite possible to have "a philosophical commitment to personal liberty" and at the same time be a quivering homophobe. (Having a philosophical commitment to personal liberty is not necessarily the same as an actual, practical commitment to personal liberty, either.) Whether that is true of most of the commentosphere here, I don't know.
But then, an unknown number of the commenters here are gay themselves. Ourselves. Me, for one.
you are right, of course, Promiscuous. i was projecting and i can only truly speak for myself.
The 11:47 Anonymouse said
Hundreds. Why not just say thousands? If we're just picking numbers...
Some of us don't have to simply conjure numbers out of the air. I was a participant in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study for many years beginning in the late 1980s. This was the first large study of every aspect of HIV that the researchers could think of, and it included intake interviews of extraordinary thoroughness. One segment, termed the psychosexual interview, required that I provide a enumeration of the number of partners of which genders with whom I had engaged in which specific sexual acts and how often, covering my entire life up to that date -- at that time my early 30s. I was dumbfounded at this request; how could I possibly recall?
The interviewer, a grad student I expect, had obviously dealt with this problem before. She suggested that I tackle the problem in stages, like high school, college, and subsequent time periods that made sense based on the changes in my life. That ultimately worked, though the final totals were an estimate based on assumptions of my standard operating procedure at various times. Erring on the conservative side, my total partners to that date was something in excess of 1,000. And to think that until that moment I hadn't thought of myself as being a complete sex pig. I mean, it wasn't like I made my weekend home at The Mineshaft. Turns out I didn't need to.
So, Anonymouse, don't assume that when someone cites a certain quantity of sexual partners they are merely drawing a number out of a hat hoping to impress, or shock, or whatever. Sometimes those numbers are based on a reasonable calculation, and convey no particular value or status on the person in question.
The first Anonymouse somewhat snidely asks whether casual sex is not all it's "cracked up to be." Well, yes, darling mouse, it is. It's hella fun, and with appropriate precautions I think the world would be much better off if everyone had lots more sex than they do now. (NB: essential to those precautions is pregnancy prevention. Far too many hoomans already!)
IOZ, I agree that this 'cleanliness' fetish has Victorian overtones, but I feel within it an additional Middle Ages flavor. While the Victorians were fans of quarantine, their forebears favored the cleansing effect of fire and it's societal cousin, shunning. These attitudes are the result of magical thinking, that somehow there are knowable signs of purity, sigils of contamination, that can assure risk or the absence thereof. The men I know who have recently been infected were all confident that they were with safe, 'clean' partners.
Jake Shears has better pecs, but I'm younger.
fucking fucking rules.
We're going to cut your johnson off, IOZ!
You mean, coitus?
But do you have dance moves like Jake?
No, honey, that's why I have a blawg instead of a Pop career.
You could always be the white Humpty Hump. He can't dance either, but that didn't stop him from inventing his own!
Yeah, I think I'd rather help Jake Shears crack a thousand.
Trust Philip Allen to bring the Academy into the Bedroom, and therefore spoil a perfectly good thread with his finicky bitchiness. Piss off.
"required that I provide a enumeration of the number of partners of which genders with whom I had engaged in which specific sexual acts and how often, covering my entire life up to that date -- at that time my early 30s. I was dumbfounded at this request"
Yeah, I would be too. By "enumeration" are they asking if you can count? No wonder these ventures get so little cooperation.
I've gone and riled the Anonymice.
Assuming they are different mice, the 3:14 mouse asserts I possess 'finicky' bitchiness. Sweetie, the appropriate adjective is 'prissy', thank you very much.
Love your writing, IOZ, but seem to find it necessary to repetitively remind us that you are, indeed, a "top." Not one of those sissy bottoms, oh no, not you.
Is it possible thou doth protest too much? That your exaggerated, projected image as a much in demand "top" masks an overpowering urge to bottom like a two bit alley dumpster whore for a line of fluid dripping studs lined up around the block?
Just asking.
Tim, can't a man be both?
Hardeehar. Someone was telling me about reading one of these "blog" things where the author adopted an unremittingly hyperbolic persona, but I was all, like, no fucking way, and then I shot him and ate his heart.
"hyperbolic persona"
Is that what the kids are calling convenient postures of self-defense these days?
prevacid prepac pills for ulcersbest pharmacy ultram
[url=http://www.bebo.com/buylevitraonline1]buy levitra online pharmacy online[/url]
Post a Comment