Wednesday, March 25, 2009

The Old Buy and Buy


Rosanne Altshuler assures us on NPR that saving money will blow up the moon.

Minor tax give-backs amounting to twelve cents per paycheck or whatever do not spur "consumption," our regnant raison d'être. Has so-called capitalism become so crackpot [IOZ: yes!] that we no longer even recognize that their are modes of production--that we no longer recognize production, having sacrificed it to that Mammon, Productivity, long ago?

If you employ people productively, whereby in exchange for making shit or doing something useful and they are compensated with a fair hourly wage or reasonable salary, then they will buy goods and services from other people doing the same. If, on the other hand, you create an economy [IOZ: yes, create] in which the purpose of wages is to spend a percentage on retirement con games in which worker money is pooled and invested by a few money managers who reap exorbitant profits and the retained majority of worker income is to be immediately flushed down the toilet of unnecessary and profligate consumption, bolstered by the availability of unbacked credit, then sooner or later you will have an economy in which people with lousy jobs and no savings who don't produce anything don't buy anything.

Not. Conceptually. Difficult.

9 comments:

A.Pwog said...

But...but what about our hope for change? This is the most important progressive historical era ever in history! Surely Blogging for Obama raises our productivity, increases our GNP and clears our sinuses!

What about that, huh? HUH? Ha! Obviously you don't have an answer so I win. Ha!

Thomas Daulton said...

Obviously you haven't kept up with the numerous updates to Capitalism 2.0 since about the beginning of the Clinton era. You should adjust that little "Automatic Updates" icon in your Systems Tray.

erin4iraq said...

I think it's actually the "sweet buy and buy" (no Naomi Klein-Wolfe, but I'm trying)

TGGP said...

What consumption is necessary and what isn't? One's man's making shit and buying goods and services from those who do the same is another man's profligacy.

Anonymous said...

I thought of Msr. when I heard - courtesy of NPR - that NYC was raising its transit fares to $2.50.

$2.50!...for a one-way subway or bus ride.

It staggers the mind of this old-time, one-time NY commuter.

Prof. Obvious

Dunc said...

The fundamental problem is that same one that led to the development of the advertising industry - nobody actually needs to buy new shit all the time.

Anonymous said...

DEWD, advertising is simply the most ubiquitous form of consumption that we have (remember, companies purchase your attention)

MR Bill said...

Maybe we only need to blow up enough of the moon (oh, inconstant moon..."a ruined world, a globe burnt out, a corpse upon the road to night") to ablate some of it, enough to make a debris cloud to cut Earth's received solar radiation by, oh, a percent or two.
Or not.
And for shits and giggles, I recommend Dorothy L. Sayres Murder Must Advertise as an early 20th cent. view of just how bad advertising would get. It seems Sayres inflicts on her aristocratic sleuth Lord Peter Whimsy the career she loathed, ad copywriting. The plot is a kerfuffle about cocaine smugglers, but it has its pleasures.

MapleStory Gold said...


Good day time. Is extremely good post. It all seems to be fantasticBuy D3 Items Buy MapleStory Gold