Glenn Greenwald is not exactly wrong when he suggests that, taken as discrete acts, the release of additional so-called torture memos was modestly praiseworthy, even as the high officials releasing them continue to claim immunity for any and all criminal acts. On the other hand, Greenwald's contention that "as a matter of political reality, Obama had to incur significant wrath from powerful factions by releasing these memos, and he did that," is totally over the top and thoroughly baseless. Significant political wrath? Oh, Nancy. Because a few man-bimbos frothed in impotent gimp-anger on the internet-doomed pages of a few reactionary newspapers? Because some Republican congresscreature accused him of perfidy? Because of FOX News? Bitch, please. Superjesus Black Reagan polls almost as well as Clinton did at his Dow-hardened peak, and he's not even into fat chicks. He suffers nothing from letting everyone know that they already know what they already know.
The people who believe that Obama is a Muzlin negro terrorist from outer space will believe it regardless. Meanwhile, Obama gets praise from liberal quarters even as they grumble that he's not sending Doughboy Gonzales for a little taste of his own medicine at Bagram, all the while affirming the central and far more important principle here, which is the principle that the President is the sovereign that the sovereign immunity of the federal government, the executive branch in particular, is essentially absolute, that the Nixonian principle holds: if the President does it, it isn't illegal. The king can do no wrong.
Regardless of the reasons, it is clear that Obama will not single-handedly eliminate the immunity from the rule of law which the political class and other elites have arrogated unto themselves. If anything, as his comments yesterday reflect, he is likely to affirm and defend that immunity (and, obviously, he personally benefits from its ongoing vitality). Demanding that political leaders be subjected to the rule of law -- and finding ways to force the appointment of a Special Prosecutor -- is what citizens ought to be doing. Either we care about the rule of law or we don't -- and if we do, we'll find the ways to demand its application to the politically powerful criminals who broke multiple laws over the last eight years. Obama's release of those torture memos yesterday makes that choice unambiguously clear and enables the right to choice to be made.With due respect, no we won't. Either the inchoate political and economic upheavals in the world will fundamentally alter the American imperium or they will not. Through no bullshit democracy, however, no procedural prestidigitation, will we force our rulers to accounts.
14 comments:
For a guy who seems smart enough to know better, Glenn sure is doggedly optimistic.
Optimism is the opiate of the policy-wonk classes.
is this like Stankonia?
"Significant political wrath? Oh, Nancy. Because a few man-bimbos frothed in impotent gimp-anger on the internet-doomed pages of a few reactionary newspapers? Because some Republican congresscreature accused him of perfidy? Because of FOX News? Bitch, please"
__________
No, not because any of that. It's because the CIA and Pentagon -- sort of important constituencies in Washington: like, the most important -- tend not to like it when their dirty secrets and detailed descriptions of their lawless behavior are handed out to the world, especially when they're demanding that it not be.
What are they going to do, give anonymous quotes to Chucky Krauthammer? It's not like you see a lot of CIA officers or high-rank officers resigning. These people are pathetic, whipped, careerist little pipsqueaks. You think any full general is going to risk being relieved and retired at a lower rank? Please.
they might be bastards, but they're our bastards.
they might be bastards, but they're Obama's bastards now.
What's funny is that the right-wing narrative is that the CIA (tag-teaming with the State department) is full of pinkos who pulled off a hidden coup to make Bush look bad and lose wars or something like that. The U.S military can never lose, even if it goes to war with the ocean, it can only be stabbed in the back.
The ocean has been eroding our shores for far too long now.
I am writing a letter to my Congresscritter demanding that the Ocean be MADE TO PAY for its crimes against AMERICA!
BEWARE OF THEM THAT SWIM!
Nice to see IOZ getting frisky about Greenwald again. Glenn's last visit here resulted in an over-the-knee tushie-paddling for Monsieur, and I was starting to worry he'd been scarred for life.
These people are pathetic, whipped, careerist little pipsqueaks.
'These people' may be pathetic and careerist but they're hardly whipped or little. In fact, they are the very definition of unlimited power. The CIA operates in a covert manner outside the law and can bully, terrorize, torture and kill anyone in the world, whistle and move on and never be held to account.
So how is that whipped or little?
Obama does hold a lot of the cards now, but I wouldn't count the shadow government/military-industrial-complex out completely.
Post a Comment