Although it is a truth universally acknowledged that American Beauty is the worst movie ever made, one still, on occasion, runs across this sort of thing:
Perhaps the problem with this collaboration is that Sam Mendes' weaknesses as a director line up too perfectly with those of his screenwriters. Mendes is drawn to projects with a broad social scope, but his most memorable scenes are stand-alone lyrical moments, like the scene in American Beauty in which a plastic bag blows in the wind.Lyrical, perhaps, like an embarrassingly overwrought folk anthem, but certainly not stand-alone. American Beauty's titanic moral and aesthetic pretensions hinge on those moments of blowing bag, filmed in inexplicably poor digital video, although what precisely the bag represents in the overburdened metaphoric schema of Mendes' minimum opus is unclear. Ah, if only we took time from our cluttered, harried, precarious emotional lives to contemplate . . . a plastic fucking bag, borne on a parking-lot breeze. It helps to be stoned.
Aside from the auteur's own obvious confusion about what, if anything, the moment means, the plain problem emerges: a badly-filmed plastic bag blowing around in front of a wall is ugly, stupid, and unredemptive. Film, literature, and photography have long found startling beauty in the weeds growing through the cracks, so to speak, but this is emphatically not that. It is instead a scene of such utter banality that it finally does succeed as a metaphor, just not the metaphor its creator intended. It is a metaphor for a banal, exhausted, strip-mined movie, something so totally plain and commonplace that not even an honest-to-god stoner would take it for anything more significant.
I do, however, agree with Dana Stevens, that Dave Eggers blows.
42 comments:
Oh I don't know. I liked Heartbreaking work of staggering genius and Kevin Spacey's perfomance in American Beauty makes up for the pretentious stuff. Just sayin.
What? You've never seen Battlefield Earth?
I have it on good authority that you, in fact, blow. And snort blow, for that matter. So there!
Kevin Spacey? Girlfriend for real?
Well.....yes. hehehehee
The thing about the bag is, it's perfectly possible to imagine a director managing to make a bag blowing in the wind look beautiful. Mendes, however, doesn't do that. Instead, he shows us a dumb old ordinary bag blowing in the wind and has a rather dull character pontificate about how damn beautiful we're supposed to find it.
Maybe it's because I lack sophistication, but pretentiousness can't bring down a movie like plot holes. "A History of Violence," then, is the worst movie ever.
Movies far worse than American Beuaty are released every week. And the empty plastic bag was filmed with video because it was supposed to have been videoed by the teenaged drug dealer.
"Dave Eggers blows."
You say that like it's a bad thing.
although what precisely the bag represents in the overburdened metaphoric schema of Mendes' minimum opus is unclear.
"Hey, audience, you all want to put one of these over your heads and tie it at the neck, don't you? Fortunately for me, you already bought your tickets."
or,
"This represents what the cast appear unable to act their way out of."
Though I'm sorta with Jenny. Spacey was a pretty good fit for Glengarry Glen Ross and The Usual Suspects. He's just not anywhere near as good as he apparently thinks he is (a not-uncommon Hollywood trait). Note that the films I liked him in were ensemble works.
every now and then when I see a grocery bag blow around a parking lot, I think of that scene and how insipid that movie was
and what a relief the ending was
The bag was miscast, but gave a memorable performance, certainly superior to Spacey's.
Drip wins.
angela: what are you doing?
ricky: filming this dead bird.
angela: why?
ricky: b/c it's beautiful.
hahahahahahaha. this scene, the plastic bag scene, the "i filmed a dead homeless women" scene, were the lamest ever. somebody tell mendes that birds, like, you know, fly & stuff. and that they are more beautifuler.
spacey sux. compare him to that hackman fellow as lex luthor.
Ah hah hah hah hah! Listen to all the film school dropouts who have never advanced beyond uploading clips to YouTube they made with Windows Movie Maker. Where's your feature presentation, phagz? Ah ha ha ha ha!
I thought the bird scene and the bag scene were purposely pretentious as an attempt to show that Ricky, despite the other characters acting as if he had some sort of insight, was ultimately a damaged, poser kid...the same way the whore is revealed to be the virgin...and Frank really wants to suck a big dick....etc etc.
I think there are reasons to pan the movie, I just don't think the bag is one of them.
Well, the soundtrack was sublime... Thomas Newman is the best film composer around these days.
Uh, the bag is nothing more than the sentimentality of a moment. It is the banality that's the point. I'm not praising the film, but I thought it was kind of obvious.
It wasn't that the bag was beautiful; it's that he thought it was beautiful, and that's all that they thought needed to be said. I liked Magnolia better.
@ Lucky Laud...
What? What? The whore is a virgin? The Marine is gay? Gee thanks for the spoilers, I had been waiting 10 years to rent that movie and I was finally gonna see it tonight.
I have always thought the aesthetic of the grocery bag in American Beauty is very similar to IOZ's whole scene (and those who "follow" him). Banality at the service of world-weary wit, or something like that. I think IOZ knows this too, therefore the pre-emptive "I am way cooler than that" of this post.
Keep doing what you do, man, you're the best.
I think some of you are blaming poor Mendes for the sins of Alan Ball, who makes Dave Eggers look like a staggering genius.
....yeah, but have you seen Meatballs II where the alien gets high and stuff?
yeah because you have to make a movie before you can make fun of a movie
Well, I was making fun of Sam Mendes and Kevin Spacey. I have not made either one, so I shall desist mocking their efforts further unti something develops.
erin4bigotry is just mad because the closet case wasn't portrayed as a pedophile. Which all homos are.
Wait, wasn't Spacey the pedophile?
dude, Waterworld?
Six Feet Under was awesome and fuck all y'all who say otherwise.
That would be a pederast, Erin. But, you know, sixteen year old, three year old, what's the difference.
I don't know - you tell me.
I don't know
Well, that explains a lot.
I thought Annette Benning's scene where she trying to clean the crappy house was much more sublime than the stupid bag.
WOW, Eggers blows...and not in the good way.
Vocab lesson for anon 8:12 - "Pederasty or Paederasty pronounced [ˈpɛdəˌræsti] (American) or [ˈpiːdəˌræsti] (British), is an erotic relationship between an adolescent boy and an adult man outside his immediate family."
So Spacey's character wasn't a pederast. He could be a pedophile, which wikipedia defines, in part, as: "any adult who is sexually attracted to children or who sexually abuses a child."
Right you are on the definition Erin, but calling a guy a pedophile for having sex with a physically mature girl who did, in fact, initiate it is tendentious. We have an arbitrary legal definition that says you can't have sex until age eighteen, fine. Yet most people would agree that there is nothing inherently magical about eighteen as opposed to fifteen or sixteen, that it really depends on the individual. When I was sixteen, my fourteen year old girlfriend and I were getting our freak on regularly, and neither one of us was warped by the experience. I would have been thrilled to be approached by a hot twenty-something substitute teacher. And so on. Pretending that someone like Spacey's character (who actually passed on the opportunity once he realized that the girl was not actually emotionally mature enough, you remember) is indistinguishable from a guy who likes luring kindergartners into his van with candy is dishonest.
Erin, are teenagers pedophiles when they want to fuck, suck, and grind against other teenagers?
Well going back to the definition of pedophile just two entries prior, I'd say no.
But why is a teenager a child? Lead me through this.
You're obviously not a parent, and quite probably a predator.
Um, erin, I have serious issues with the 'consent' laws in this country, but I have no desire to screw a 16 year old... And if the 16 year old is mature enough to make sexual decisions on their own, the parents, and the law, should kindly fuck off.
I fear for your children's future if you are so reluctant to give them the tools they need to become adults.
Thanks for the parenting advice. Now kindly go fuck yourself and leave the kids alone.
Well.. I'd rather inspire the kids with music, poetry and science, so that they'll cast off the provincial stupidity of inheritance and reach for something real.
Actually, Erin, I am a parent. I try to keep it from affecting my reason as much as possible.
Now don't get me wrong; had I a teenage girl, I'd be very distressed if she were approached by (or if she approached) a middle aged man, but I wouldn't need the accusation of pedophilia in order to be bothered. There is something wrong with that scenario, but it's not pedophilia.
Post a Comment