Curiously, people like Ezra Klein, who are deeply concerned about the brutality of "the régime" of President (and future President-presumptive) Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, evince no sign of knowing, or being interested in knowing, what Iran was like when Mir Hussein Moussavi was prime minister in the eighties. In a phrase: worse! This is not to say that Moussavi might not legitimately have changed, nor to engage in an exercise of comparative, relativistic (im)morality. But, as we used to say in comparative cultural lesbionics seminars back at leafy Oberlin, perhaps we could complicate our understanding . . . uh, problematize our prior assumptions? When push comes to pummel, Moussavi's reformist rhetoric seems to be pretty thin gruel; he talks of returning to the teachings of Khomeni. Well, American liberals are awfully fond of "take back" narratives, aren't they? Moussavi's reformist campaign and image, not to mention his fervent support among university students and highly educated urbanites certainly bear a distinct resemblance to another epochal reformer who is even as we speak working diligently and assiduously to rationalize the policies of his predecessor. Change you can believe in.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Moussavi's family owns the universities.
Well, I have to say I've always been a big IRI fan since back in the day. I mean, Khomeini was so fucking badass with those glowering eyes and Sean Connery good looks. Sure, the shah had his Lanvin uniforms, but the ayatollah could really fucking work those jedi robes...plus he wore ladies' perfume and had a soft spot in his heart for trannies. I mean, what's not to like?
And I'm probably the only person who supported the Iraq war on totally correct grounds...specifically because it would strengthen Iran and Hezbollah. Oops! Looks like I was right, cruise-missile liberals!
So yeah, fuck yeah: Mousavi. Give the Glorious Islamic Revolution a new lease on life. Let me indulge my bromosexual mancrush on black-turbaned old queens for another 30 years. Fuck yeah! Twitter on, progs!
what Iran was like when Mir Hussein Moussavi was prime minister in the eighties.
Got a reference handy?
Got a reference handy?
Just to start with...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1988_Massacre_of_Iranian_Prisoners
Hey IOZ - would you please comment on the hilarious goings-on at the Daily Dish re Iran? Maybe even... a whole post? I can't find the words to appropriately skewer it, beyond saying things like preening self-satisfied and loathsome.
Also find it funny that he takes a page from none other than Michelle Malkin by periodically having a post about how Blogs Like Mine are what is killing the newspaper.
As we speak, I expect that Sullivan is injecting green food coloring in his balls, so as to jizz solidarity with the Iranian people.
We're all Iranians now!
As we speak, I expect that Sullivan is injecting green food coloring in his balls, so as to jizz solidarity with the Iranian people.
Sully does saline ball-injections??? Actually, that don't suprise me at all.
Right, well, Iranian national interests are not likely to change very much. I don't believe that they will. You see the same thing in the United States between presidents. Absolutely.
I think the mistake is assuming the
"Green Revolution", as it's called, and I think it is revolutionary, that it is just about Mousavi. You know, they're shouting death to the Supreme Leader, indicting the whole system's legitimacy as a fraud. Mousavi is a face, somewhat liberal, but still a conservative Islamist, attached to the revolution. But he's just a personality. What's going on is much bigger than that, than him. And revolutions tend to outpace simple figures. They change them with it.
Post a Comment