Today in 2009 we’re in a lot of ways back to where we were four years ago—able for American forces to start leaving on a high note, confident that they performed their job with skill, and leaving Iraqi leaders with a handshake.Or you could say that in 2009 a tactically exhausted and strategically impotent American army is beginning a pullback, leaving behind a million or two (it is a mark, a stain, a dishonor, a horror that we frankly have no idea) extra dead and displaced Iraqis under the rule of a gangster president who looks ever more like his predecessor, whose ouster we sought at the cost of those hundreds of thousands of lives. You could say that the "high note" on which we depart, having made the world safe for British Petroleum, consists of a level of daily terror and violence, both on behalf of the extant state and on behalf of the various insurgencies, hold-outs, rebels, extremists, and others, that would fracture and destroy any internally peaceful western society. The "job" performed so admirably by American forces was the unprovoked invasion and occupation of a foreign nation, and the fact that the American military has subsequently managed to mop much of the blood from the gutters does not obviate or abnegate these facts. Meanwhile the assurances from the leaders of the various Iraqi factions that it is all now a matter of political accommodation and hard bargaining between them reeks of misinformation. Here, for example, Qubad Talabani, the son of Iraq's new warlord-dictator, tells a series of self-serving and transparent fairy-tale lies to NPR's Scott Simon, who simply cannot imagine that that lovely Oxbridge voice could tell an untruth.
-Matthew Yglesias
Here, then, you have a generational crime, an act of naked aggression rationalized post hoc as a regrettable and unnecessary event that nonetheless worked out . . . what? A little better than expected. This judgment seems to me to be wholly inaccurate, desperate, and immature. It marks not the glimmer of success but the abjectness of our failure that we comfort ourselves in knowing that the conquered province we leave behind is merely straining, rather than splitting, at the seams.
12 comments:
adding, i'm not quite so sure why yglesias et all are so eager to believe that "things are better" in iraq, when, to my knowledge, the white house has never (but for one fleeting moment in 07) even hinted that the war was going anything but according to plan.
A+
Beautiful essay, Ioz. Sums it up pretty well. Thank you for being one of the voices in the wilderness.
I'm sure Erin4Genocide will arrive any moment to burble about how happy the remaining Iraqis are with their new freedom.
Yglesias is a fucking tool.
What's so horrible about not tabulating the dead and displaced? I mean, killing and displacing people seems like it would be horrible or not horrible on its own merits, how would keeping a running count affect the degree of horror?
YF
Matthew Yglaysius is a fucking tool.
You could say that the "high note" on which we depart, having made the world safe for British Petroleum...
it would have been funnier to have made Iraq safe for Texaco rather than BP. but really, aside from that, what did we expect?
the conquered province we leave behind is merely straining, rather than splitting, at the seams.
One word : Kirkuk.
Or as Yogi would say, it ain't over til' it's over. Or is it, we've only just begun?
Matthew Yglaysius is a fucking hack.
Yglesias is a fucking hack who should be dragged out into the street and beaten with crowbars.
And there's more violence too:
http://www.juancole.com/2009/07/death-toll-in-kirkuk-rises-to-33.html
leaving behind a million or two ... extra dead and displaced Iraqis
At least a million or two dead; at least 4 million displaced. And yes, the fact that these numbers have never been mentioned in the American media reminds me how capable humans are of living under conditions of unreality.
Post a Comment