District 9 is in part a parable about discrimination, prejudice, humanity's inhumanity, etc.; True Blood is, well, for the sake of comparison, I am obliged to concede that somewhere in the dark, jangling junkyard of Alan Ball's post-syphilitic reptile brain is the shadow of the echo of the fog of the haze of the the notion that his pan-seared abortion of a television program is sorta-kinda-like about discrimination against The Gays, maybe. So they are similar, except that District 9 is a legitimately good movie, a fine entertainment, at turns funny and gross, occasionally almost moving, whereas True Blood is The Worst, having this past Sunday jumped into the water with a motorcycle, hunted down a shark, tied the motorcycle to the shark, ridden the shark, goaded the shark nearly to madness, and forced the shark to jump over another shark that was, in turn, jumping over a third shark.
The one prominent critique of District 9 is that it begins in a documentary style but becomes a standard chase flick. This is partly, but only partly true. It's a very canny movie, full of documentary bits, but also full of security cams, corporate video, staged newscasts, and, yes, standard 3rd-person semi-omnipotent movie cameras, but at no point is it ever wholly one or the other, not even when it sheds most of the trappings of the faux documentary in order to stage scenes of elaborate urban combat that, while still inferior to those in Cuaron's Children of Men, are nevertheless a thousand times superior to the canned, quick-cut battles of every other mainstream movie. That they manage to be so with the addition of alien creatures and scifi rayguns is nigh unto miraculous. District 9 is by no means a perfect movie; it has several cringe-inducing moments of High Movie Science, particularly one where A Scientist explains that our protagonist's (I won't say hero, 'cause what's a here?) "DNA is in perfect balance," half-human, half-alien. Yuh-huh. Step slowly away from the genome, son, and no one is gonna get hurt here.
The movie effectively mines our fear of the other, and though its metaphor is obvious, it is not heavy-handed. Its villains are handled clumsily in places, but its fictional downtrodden, ghettoized aliens are shown with a much more complex and sophisticated treatment than I expected. Perhaps it is because Neill Blomkamp, the director, grew up in apartheid South Africa. He shows his "prawns" with a good mixture of pathos and degradation--there is nobility, but there is also venality. The real literatures of apartheid, Jim Crow, interment, and the ghetto reveal much the same.
It bears repeating. This is a movie about bug-shaped aliens, a summer scifi flick, and yet unequivocally the finest, smartest, best wide-release film of the year.
Meanwhile, in the swamps of Looooooooweeeezeeeaaaaaanaaaaaw, Anna Paquin et alia have no idea. I find myself unable to articulate the preening awfulness of this show, which treats its own premises with all the filial love and respect of the Menendez brothers. Try to imagine, if you will, that The Sopranos featured James Gandolfini one day as a mob boss, the next as an astronaut, the third as a beagle, and then in the season finale it was revealed that Edie Falco was really a mermaid and Jamie-Lynn Sigler has been working for al-Qaeda all along. It's worth recalling that, however clumsy, True Blood did commence with a recognizable setup. Vampires are real, and now that they no longer have to kill people to survive, they are coming out into the open. How will society react? And from time to time, the show still recalls this fundamental fact of its fictional universe. Then a fly buzzes, a car honks in the distance . . . ooo, pretty, shiny.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
A Tale of Two Parables
Labels:
Culture,
Movies,
Television
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
27 comments:
Pretty? Shiny? I wanna see! I wanna see! Can I have it?
Do the aliens in District 9 have an average IQ one standard deviation lower than than humans, and are more prone to violence and antisocial attributes? Because otherwise the metaphor doesn't work.
Alan Ball?
That's cute. No, the metaphor only works if the aliens came to Earth and put us in camps, in our own land. No, wait. We made those movies, and some still didn't get it.
True Blood, incidentally, is pretty much indefensible. You've got every main character basically being an imbecile, but then there are terrific side characters of whom I want to see more, but never will. Maybe you'll differ. In any case, I can't really disagree. I've still watched it, even as I've groaned at this line or that stupid, illogical action. But then again, Michelle Forbes as a villain is always entertaining. I guess I forgive the banality for the brief moments. Who knew souffle could be so dramatic?
They've remade Alien Nation?
50% human, 50% insect - someone call Jeff Goldblum and David Cronenberg.
"I'd like to become the first insect politician."
And dub over the dialogue from the Naked Lunch.
"We want you to work for us Bill."
"Homosexuality is the best all-round cover an agent ever had."
Actually, Inspector, my good friend and fellow filmgoer looked at me as we exited the theater and said, "David Cronenburg just broke his hand pounding his fist on the table for not getting to it first."
"True Blood" sucks. Rhinos. Big time.
The occasional metaphor for total gayitude immediately falls apart when one considers that gays are not, by definition, horrible blood-sucking monsters. And never were (i.e., weren't recently relieved of their blood-sucking monsterdom). At least as far as I know. Seems kinda obvious.
But even the totally lame occasional metaphor doesn't suck rhinos as much as the ridiculously poorly affected regional accents. Keanu Reeves's hungover and half-assed effort in another shitty vampire vehicle was less offensive.
Yeah, Alien Nation is the clear precedent for District 9, and it's a bit off-putting that the reviewers haven't given it its due.
D-9's biggest accomplishment, IMO, is that it depicts the aliens as revolting, stupid, violent, and pathetic, but still has you rooting for their victory over their oppressors by the end. Just like the real-life history of colonialism.
As for True Blood... it had a moment during the first season when it could have gone over the top with its camp, and instead decided to just be stupid without being freaky (the excellent credit sequence notwithstanding). Not that I'm not still watching it, of course.
i've yet to see d9, but your hypothetical sopranos sounds kind of awesome.
The worse the review of Trueblood, the more intrigued I become. It sounds hideously beautiful.
Wait, what? Apartheid? I thought District 9 was an allegory for Snarlin' Arlen Specter's transition in party allegiances and his support of Obamaids.
District 9 is fresh, but if you gave me a ticket to see its sequel, I wouldn't go. Whereas I'll be watching True Blood next week with the rest of you.
I granted the D9 the premise that aliens landed and so on, and what does it come beggin' me to believe ten minutes later? The head of this roundup project stumbling on a twenty-years-in-the-making fuel container within minutes of its completion.
But more importantly, why was the project to leave the planet secret, anyway? The heroes and everyone else on earth (excepting the bad corporation and Nigerian scammers) would very much like the aliens to go back where they came from. And so is the whole thing supposed to be like the American Colonization Society (Henry Clay = alien-man hybrid, Liberia = home planet)?
And while I'm pressing on analogies until they pop, what's up with Godrick? He doesn't seem straight-forwardly self-loathing and suicidal. Something more complicated, but it's not clear how we're supposed to think of him. And if he's so surprised by Sookie's tears, maybe he hasn't really understood the revolution that synthesized blood has brought about for vampire-human relations. On the face of it, he could not have chosen less opportune time in his 2,000+ years to decide vampire are nasty and don't belong, and so kill himself.
Or maybe Godrick's story is some sort of allegory about how gay marriage is gonna be a bittersweet achievement that, while an accomplishment of human compassion, will not really be suited to our gay nature, and so we'll choose to burst into flames, rather than live in the suburbs. I dunno.
I think Godrick was just vampire Jesus, honestly. Very tired, but I love the idea that said vampire Jesus was also a total angel of death back in the high Middle Ages. Now, that's the kind of monster I want to watch.
I think I like the show just for the ideas it takes up for a moment and then tosses away.
I like TrueBlood primarily because it reads like Flannery O'Conner if she wrote vampire serials. Which is really just hilarious. That said, I'm really looking forward to Thirst (having seen his previous three films). If IOZ sees it first, I'd love to know your opinion...
"True Blood" sucks. Rhinos. Big time.
Think about your comment. Who would not want to witness the sucking of a rhino? I wouldn't care if it was another rhino, a human, or a vampire. This is something I want to see. You encourage others to watch "True Blood."
You don't need to encourage me! I revel in the awfulness.
District 9 sucks. Rhinos. Big time.
John Caruso seems to have expected Gallipoli.
But seriously, Caruso jumps on the "racist depiction of Nigerians" bandwagon, which is the crutch of soft-hearted lefty Americans who wish to avoid some of the truths of the African continent by insisting on seeing "race" through the two-color spectrum of American domestic political struggle. The fact that the Townships were beset by savage, exploitative gangs, often of foreign origin, doesn't enter such analysis.
Within the context of the movie, regardless, it is worth noting that the white people are routinely and consistently depicted as being much, much worse.
Funny enough, some conservatives think its a politically incorrect anti-immigration movie.
Children of Men got some rave reviews, but I thought it was lame.
I got no opinions on this matter other than that was a truly entertaining post.
Caruso jumps on the "racist depiction of Nigerians" bandwagon, which is the crutch of soft-hearted lefty Americans who wish to avoid some of the truths of the African continent by insisting on seeing "race" through the two-color spectrum of American domestic political struggle.
Ah, well perhaps you also enjoyed the humorous spectacle of lefties all worked up over the "racism" of Resident Evil 5, because the zombies are Africans -- even grass skirt-wearing tribesmen, in many cases! Obviously, the only reason anyone would play a video game like that is because it's the only way you can act on your heart's true desire, that of being a roided-up white bioterrorism agent who gets to mow down fields of untermeschen.
I wonder if IOZ's last comment, which is true enough, will make Inkberrow's head explode, or make him come.
Obviously, the only reason anyone would play a video game like that is because it's the only way you can act on your heart's true desire, that of being a roided-up white bioterrorism agent who gets to mow down fields of untermeschen.
Well, I remember a long while back I saw a trailer for that, and it was a white guy going into some African slum, blowing away the scary black zombies and monologuing
about how he didn't even know if the place was worth saving.
So, I said on some message board that the whole thing was a little bit funky, and the response was pretty much
"Anybody who says this makes them uncomfortable is saying Capcom is in bed with the KKK, and since they're obviously not, anybody who doesn't like it is obviously a liberal kook"
Nothing in this country can ever be a little bit racist. It bothers me that I have to walk on eggshells and come up with weird euphamisms like "racially insensitive" to explain why I think it's weird to have a white guy blow away a bunch of feral black slum dwellers while he talks about how the slum dwellers probably don't deserve to be saved from the zombie hoard.
It bugs me, man.
District 9 was awesome. It is, in fact, less about apartheid per se than the continuous present. "I want the power in that arm."
John Caruso seems to have expected Gallipoli.
Nope, I just expected more than a mashup of Alien Nation, Starship Troopers, and Amistad. If what you got is all it takes to make you happy, though, good for you.
Thanks for the hilarious "jumps on the 'racist depiction of Nigerians' bandwagon"/"soft-hearted lefty Americans who wish to avoid truths" bit, by the way; after the howls of outrage I got for this, I really appreciate the irony.
@Christopher
It seems you're criticizing RE5 for being racist, while complaining that nothing can be a little bit racist. Truly confusing.
Christopher, dude, you're killing people in that game because they're zombies, not because they're black. Unless someone is going to say that it's racist to set the game in Africa to begin with, I don't see why accepting the horror/sci-fi premise has to mean anything whatsoever about race relations in the real world. Most people understand that it is ultimately a work of fiction, y'know...
John C.: let it not be said that I am entirely unreasonable. I like the link.
Post a Comment