Thursday, September 24, 2009

Notes on the Lameness of The People's Uprising

The people's uprising was a brief and hilarious failure, as I expected, although the sweet scent of tear gas now drifts over my garden, suggesting what might have been. It was mostly kids, and while charmingly earnest, they mostly didn't understand the most basic principles of protest or cooperative action, and so they were easily and swiftly dispersed by the police. We may lament the gaudy police state in which we live and chuckle ruefully at the loudspeaker warning, "This is an illegal assembly"--the fuzz no longer even bothers to change the constitutional language in propounding orders that directly contravene the rights that language is meant to guarantee. Puts a man in a mordant mood. Anyway, you know, a great deal more might have been demonstrated if they'd held hands, sat down, and sung spirituals. If you'll pardon me, their problem is just as much aesthetic as it is political. They are not compelling.

29 comments:

American Exceptionalist said...

Americans once again prove that their British cousins are much better at getting their hate on (please see G10 demos in April). Perhaps because the Brits always whinge, so it's not a big step between whinge and action. That and everyone still remembers the riots that got rid of (sort of) Maggie Thatcher not even 20 years ago.

Jeez - Americans need to like butch up or something.

NutellaonToast said...

"They are not compelling."

Yeah, it's true. Who needs reality these days? We've got reality TV!

switters said...

1.) They, like the teabaggers/912ers/whateverers, don't actually know what exactly it is that they're supposed to be protesting, which makes it hilarious.

2.) Protesting is so 2008. Maybe they could get Barry's buddy to come out of retirement and start blowing stuff up.

3.) None of it really matters since everyone's pretty much gonna do with their money what they want.

4.) Best to "get off the grid" sooner rather than later.

¯\(°_0)/¯ said...

If you'll pardon me, their problem is just as much aesthetic as it is political.

Isn't this why they are still protesting, and not running the show?

Anonymous said...

Yeah, bravo. Way to piss all over a bunch of kids who not only share many of the same ideals as you, but are willing to put themselves at risk in an attempt to advance those ideals. Must be nice having the anonymity and relative privilege to allow such a luxury. But at least you're way, way cooler than they are.

IOZ said...

Erratum: everyone is a special, precious flower.

the_system said...

"What we've seen today is people's willingness to resist global capitalism despite the combined forces of state repression," the statement said, "The police have rampantly abused their so-called less lethal weapons. What less lethal means is that they are WILLING TO KILL to silence those voices which are already excluded from these summits." [emphasis mine]

...

Protesters exposed to the gas were coughing, complaining of eyes watering and stinging.

...

NutellaonToast said...

"Protesters exposed to the gas were coughing, complaining of eyes watering and stinging."

Well, that was nice of the police to get them high.

JRB said...

I second Anonymous: Rubber bullets, tear gas -- and now IOZ?

Rough day for The People!

The next time I visit my in-laws in Chalk Hill, I will know to invite you out for drinks, not revolution.

Rowan said...

So...were there more or less of them than the teabaggers?

tooearly said...

i swear the whole thing must have been staged; where did they get those costumes. This is as absurd theater as the tea parties on the right.

Anonymous said...

IOZ. Flaccid masturbatory wordplay is as passe as sprout laden pita nibblings launched during that low wattage light bulb moment when :moo!: he-and-she-vegan-of-earthy-ass realizes the cattle chute leads to the abattoir.

Kidnapping. Bank Robbery. Arson.
Cataclysmic Destruction.Maneuver The O in as Caterers.
What kind of fuckin Hooterville G20 is this? LOL.

Anonymous said...

The irony is, disenfranchised as they are, most of them probably support some form of centralized, intrusive government

Kafka said...

Agreed on the aesthetics. Can't do much better than Gandhi and MLK. Stand your ground with some dignity and purpose and take your beatings. Silence, no signs, no costumes and Roman legion style disciplined line formations put you on the same tactical level as the cops.

nony said...

Are we due for one of those Statement of Principles posts? Them's the best.

Keifus said...

their problem is just as much aesthetic as it is political. They are not compelling.

Goddamn hippies.

K (as my grandfather would have put it two martinis in)

Harvey Gangbanger said...

IOZ sneers:

If you'll pardon me, their problem is just as much aesthetic as it is political. They are not compelling.

Booorrr-ing! Novelty, he says! He wants novelty! And quit looking like you just stumbled off of Yasgur's farm!

Yet he also sneers at groups like Adbusters who, it could be said, try to make "protest" something cool and fun and flashy. Compelling, perhaps.

Why, I'm getting the impression that our boy's just gonna sneer no matter what.

IOZ said...

We'll see how the "sanctioned" march goes today.

There were more teabaggers in DC for their big to-do, but far fewer in Pittsburgh when they tried it here.

Anonymous said...

Can't do much better than Gandhi and MLK. Stand your ground with some dignity and purpose and take your beatings. Silence, no signs, no costumes and Roman legion style disciplined line formations put you on the same tactical level as the cops.

Yes times a thousand.

It was damn dispiriting attending the DC anti-war demos during the run-up to our glorious Iraq adventure. Not as much a pious romper room as some I've seen, but still essentially a carnival: Know who loves the fucking papier-mache' puppets more than anyone? The two dozen or so frat boys and Freepers who always show up for heckling.

If memory serves, Scott Ritter made some pointed remarks about the anti-war crowd's tactics -- the usefulness of simple, uniform messages, that kind of thing. The upshot of that was a refresher in the meaning of 'pearls before swine'.
-- sglover

mac said...

The Pittsburgh protesters had some style. I noted a distinct black & white theme. No doubt a tribute to our great president. The D.C. teabaggers theme seemed to be pink and fat. Their signage showed a lot of creativity and effort. Glenn Beck would have been proud.

Steven Augustine said...

It's hard to protest too hard against a status quo that makes such awesome porno... and even allows us to act in it.

Rowan said...

It's easy to compare modern protesters to MLK and Gandhi and say "hey, these guys suck!" Well, yes, but that has more to do with the nature of protesting than MLK/Gandhi's inherent media savvy/aesthetic awesomeness.

Protests are most effective as a tactic when they illustrate a gap between stated ideals made laws and their actuality. The Freedom Riders did what they did in order to demonstrate that the federal laws against segregation weren't being followed in the states where they were most relevant.

As soon as the specific hypocrisy gap is gone, protests become aimless, scattershot, and better for networking than actually effecting change. Look at MLK when he went to Chicago. He got his ass kicked. His problem wasn't suddenly aesthetic, his problem was that marches don't do a fucking thing towards creating housing.

Kafka said...

"Martin Luther King's stay in Chicago resulted in an agreement by local real-estate agents to abide by the city's fair-housing ordinance in exchange for an end to protest marches. King is shown in November 1966, reviewing a copy of the ordinance with a West Side real-estate agent."
Chicago Tribune August 5, 1966

SteveB said...

I'm just glad to see that IOZ is finally in agreement with our President:

"I was always a big believer in - when I was doing organizing before I went to law school - that focusing on concrete, local, immediate issues that have an impact on people's lives is what really makes a difference and that having protests about abstractions [such] as global capitalism or something, generally, is not really going to make much of a difference."

Rowan said...

Kafka - a face-saving agreement for MLK and for the city of Chicago was reached. But it's not generally considered one of King's more shining moments.

Justin said...

Nice face-saving agreement of your own, Rowan.

Kafka said...

Rowan,
Point taken. As King's kick off for his northern campaign, it was a success though. The northern campaign had the goal of addressing segregation in northern cities generally- and helped show that some northerners were as rabidly racist as some southerners. Getting a rock to the head and how he handled it was some powerful aesthetics. I would argue the the aesthetic value of Chicago ended up being more important than not meeting all his goals.

Your broader point about local focus is also a good one, but King's anti Vietnam marches also had some effect.

Anonymous said...

I'm just glad to see that IOZ is finally in agreement with our President:

Cheney=Obama=IOZ?

AlanSmithee said...

So glad to see IOZ finally on the same page as his pwoggie brethren. Strength in unity, dontcha know old sock.