Lieberman. You have to admire his tenacity. He cut himself an admirable deal. Senate leadership lets him run a committee and do whatever he wants, and in exchange, he willingly functions as a convenient scapegoat and target for ineffectual Progressive wrath, as they are constitutionally incapable of understanding that he is not an impediment to the Donk's grand plans, but a primary component. Indeed, if "Republicans apply the torque that turns the thing rightward [and] . . . Democrats are the pawl," then the likes of Lieberman (see also, Ben Nelson, the Blue Dogs, et al) are the teeth on the gear, which is to say, the sharp protrusions against which the Democratic pawl clicks to prevent backsliding. The wheel turns right; the Donk slips in; Lieberman cries "Across this line . . . you do not . . ."; and the Progressive internet goes bonkers and ignores the rest of the machine. Whether health care or the terror war. Doesn't matter. The effect is the same.
Now I am sure that good liberals everywhere will crow about Lieberman's hilariously useless hearings in which various and sundry cable news commentators haul up to Capitol Hill to weight in . . . weightily on Homegrown Terrorism or whatever. But of course everyone's interests are served. The interest of propagating the crackpot nomenclature of Islamofascism and suchlike is advanced. The interest of making the Donk and The Obama appear like reasonable proceduralists is advanced. The interest of giving the Elephant a forum in which to inveigh against the depredations of Political Correctness ("Hello, 1990s? This is Politics calling.") is advanced. Thus ever does the axle turn.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
The Ratchet Effect: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Lieberman
Labels:
Conservatarians,
Lieberman,
Progress,
Terror War,
the Donkle,
The Internet,
The Oliphant
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
42 comments:
Well...and if Nader runs against Dobbs?
http://www.counterpunch.com/murphy11192009.html
Campy or Shimano? or do we hear you buzzing by on a Chris King?
Maybe it has conveniently worked out that way at times, but to suggest that Lieb is kept around by the Donks merely for purposes of scapegoatery gives them way too much in the credit department. Like, conspiracy-theorist type credit. Almost. Seriously, these guys are not that smart, and they don't care that much about creating distractions for progressives either. Progs are remarkably self-sufficient in that department.
Mr. Fun: More like fixed or freewheel.
Also, it's weigh in, minus the t.
Could not find a suitable section so I written here, how to become a moderator for your forum, that need for this?
It was very interesting for me to read that post. Thank you for it. I like such themes and anything that is connected to them. I would like to read a bit more soon.
anon @ 5:16:
ioz is listening.
This is not a guy who built his laptop here.
I can't delete the chinabots though. They're so fuckin cute.
More substantively, what if Nader runs with Dobbs? Lulz.
You need to ramp up the misogyny, dewd.
Like, chat about Hillary's romp with some lil' hot piece of chinee puta, or maybe the sluts of unfogged, especially that one crass, loud attorney byatch l-breath, possibly the most offensive c**t to be found around lib.com
So the violent actions of the American military are "domestic terrorism?" Who knew?
This post has been removed by the author.
Naaah... Just kidding.
Many of the leftist sorts of my acquaintance don't make Holy Joe the sole target of their venom; he's a symptom, not the disease. The whole 2006 whackadoodle, followed by the standing ovation from the Democratic caucus when Holy Joe made his triumphant return to Washington, made it pretty clear which way the wind blew. There's plenty of powerless rage directed against Harry Reid, who is shockingly not a progressive, despite being a Mormon from Nevada. Pelosi manages to talk a good game, yet somehow Bart Stupid has to be catered to, while the CPC gets pissed on repeatedly ... and appears to enjoy it.
Anyway, my grumpiness with Holy Joe arises from (1) his thorougly brickable, jowly sanctimony, and (2) the fact that he purports to represent me. It's almost as if representative democracy doesn't work.
Reid's not perfect, but his voting record rates about the same as Pelosia's on the Prog-o-meter, which is to say he outscores a Lieberman, or Feinstein (California's Lieberdem--actually DiFi's closer to GOP, arguably).
Reid also put forth an anti-speculation bill , shot down in 2008 by Big oil, AKA GOP (and a few Demos abstaining, including....Ted Kennedy (pal of Scalia, for one) and BO (pal of TK). Reid's actually a fairly solid Dem, though the mormonism not great (he recently converted), though one should know something about Vegass politics to understand that.
Now, onto mo' important topix: who's the hottest hottay of the unfogged PC skank-patrol? (vote for....McMegan)
"actually DiFi's closer to GOP, arguably."
Arguably? Actually. Out here in California, pro-choice Republicans are called Democrats. Checked her voting record lately?
Arguing over which criminal is the worstest of the worserestest... the most boring, juvenile thing on earth. Good thing it's being done by a bunch of nonny mice.
Ever thus to deadbeats
Far mo' bor-reeng is the usual corporate liberal attempt to justify the conservative demos. And Anny 11:14 is correct: Feinstein's a republican for all intensive purposes. She and her sugar daddy Blum have lined their pockets from defense contracts (Difi awarded the contracts to companies for which Blum sat on the Board of directors), even outdoing a Cheney or the Clintons in terms of war profiteering.
Yet the usual demo blogs (including IOZ.com) have hardly raised a peep against a DiFi and Blum. Why? Maybe because it's verboten und un-PC to take on the AIPACocrats, regardless of their crimes.
everest mostest uber-boringest is the idea that it matters whether a Donkey is DNC, DLC, or "progressive," instead of noticing that not a single one among the 535 Congresscritters has backbone, spine, or principle beyond self-adulation, self-aggrandizement, and media mention.
It matters whether we compare Feinstein to Pelosi to Reid to Kucinich ONLY in the minds of moronic Donklebots.
you couldn't be more boring if you were a drill
You're boring Charlie Oxstein, boring as the usual AIPAC apologist. Nothin' matters to the AIPACKocrat, eh Charlie. DiFi, Lieberdems, even CheneyCo's war shekels: we're in da money.
There are distinctions to be made, however trivial they seem to some. Even Pelosi's not a Feinstein, or Lieberman. Just ignoring those distinctions is, like tantamount to f-ed up crazy sheet, Charlie.
i am going to "donny, you are out of your element" myself on this series of comments.
Sweet, now you're riffing on the InformationClearingHouse comment bosses, who point all their masturbatory fingers at THE JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS.
Swingin'. Now it's all down to blaming die juden. You'll have to remind me how the various negative things that have happened to me, in my life, were caused by die juden. Feel free to use all that knowledge about me you've displayed thus far... it's quite impressive!
We divorce political parties, not religions.
Hey Charlie Lex-Libertarian, you don't know my politics, and there was nothing particularly anti-semitic was said, though it might seem so to...an AIPAC supporter.
And we note you're a fan of ex-Reagan admin. dude Paul Craig Roberts!! Now, that's boring; at least his boss Red Alex can write a bit. And Paul's not too liked by AIPACers either (and actually, PCR knows what a POS Feinstein is as well).
Fuck you anyway, Charlie, the shystery piece of mierda.
You are the best incarnation of Mary Mary Quite Contrary on the web today, and that's why I'm an avid reader. If you need help picking out your shepherdess frock and Mary Janes for next year's Halloween party, let me know. I'd love to come to the burg and shop it with you.
This thread is bonkers. What the fuck are you . . .?
good article....................................................................................................
Nonny Mouse, I'm not a "fan" of Paul Craig Roberts. Looks like your crystal ball is hazy, bro-mouse! And "shyster"? That's supposed to show you know me, and it's supposed to do ...what else, exactly? Gosh, I'm so confused and befuddled by your witty, insightful retort that I can't quite fathom what to do. The deflection away from jew-baiting -- the reverse accusation that I'm the one raising the topic -- oh that's rich.
No matter how much you claw at the inside of that casket lid, you're still 6 feet under, Nonny.
It's just another IOZ the AIPAC accommodator thread, this time featuring Charlie Emmanuel.
phuck u, neo-con-libertarian byatch.
and some took this to be an "anarchist" site . heh heh. what a laff
Chér Maître, you got a whole new strange species of troll around here these days. My condolences.
Yes, objecting to IOzzie & Co's Jonah Goldberg praxis...trez sauvvvage
or is it Aynnie Rand?? cutting edge objectivism, , dewd.
"for all intensive purposes"? dear god.
Free the indentured porpoises!
ah jus' knew you'd dig that Aynnie-cheks o' IOZ
inserted, like intentionally, just to irritate eastern beltway neo-con fraudniks
Best comment thread evar? Yes. Best comment thread evar. Seriously. It's like gangsta rap with Comic Book Guys. I'm waiting for one-of-em's ponytail to get caught in his wheelbarrow full o' discount tacos. Docta Who marathon, muthafuckaz!
Hey nutso anonymous, I think I see a Joo poisoning your well. Better go check on that.
No, really, fuck off, you stupid chupacabra.
wow. ?
Was it Timewarp Back to Usenet Week, and no one told me?
best lesbian bondage movie clips is lil mama a lesbian busty asian lesbian pics amateur college lesbian pictures lesbian ass licking movie asian lesbian babes ariel lesbian scene
How do you think credit crunch affected porn?
----------------
kelly divine
Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now. Keep it up!
And according to this article, I totally agree with your opinion, but only this time! :)
Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now. Keep it up!
And according to this article, I totally agree with your opinion, but only this time! :)
Gals
You have got to see this. Obama playing on XBox. Funniest video ever. http://bit.ly/bllhx1
Post a Comment