
David Ignatius' phoned-in hack job on Iranian "machinations" and interference in Iraqi politics doesn't exactly move me to scrutiny, seeing as it is, well, a phoned-in hack job. That having been said, it is impossible to repeat often enough the utter, fundamental, essential, intrinsic, inherent, unavoidable, inarguable, insane absurdity of lecturing a country for taking an active role in the politics of its neighbor and longtime rival when your own nation has invaded that rival, deposed its long-standing government, mandated a new constitution, fortified and occupied its capital city, garrisoned over 100,000 occupying troops, and committed itself to an "enduring" military presence to be measured in decades at least.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Bulk of the Series
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
just because you have a log in your own eye doesn't mean you shouldn't try to get the mote out of somebody else's eye. (or something.)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052990/
And let's not forget the world's largest bunker.
Where's the money, Iran? Where's the fucking money, shithead?
I just want to understand this, sir. Every time a rug is micturated upon in this fair city, I have to compensate the owner?
what're you, a fucking park ranger now?
No ma'am, I didn't want to give the impression that we're police, exactly.
Am I the only one who gives a shit about the rules?!?!
With an attitude like that you will never be invited to write op-eds in the Washington Post.
Montag - not a log in his own eye - a "blog" in his own eye ...
IOZ, what are the U.S.'s interests in Iraq? I'm not being facetious, I really want to know. As far as I have ever been able to tell, we don't have any, making this a 100% nihilistic, meaningless war of occupation. It's really, really weird that we're in this country and nobody in the U.S. Government has ever even said why we were doing it.
And speaking of La Digs...
Let's see, Guest, first we had to stop Saddam from playing with WMDs and threatening his neighbors. Then we had to free his people from his brutal torturing regime. Then we had to get payback for 9/11, motherfuckers! Then we broke it, so we had to buy it. Then we had to stay to prevent a horrific outbreak of violence, much of it sponsored by Al-Qaeda and Iran. Then we had to fight the hajis there so wouldn't have to fight them here. Now we have to stay until the Iraqi government gets its shit together, takes responsibility for the mess we made, and doesn't need our "help" anymore. Does that help?
Hey, who's got an insane amount of petrol reserves in their trunk, huh?
IOZ, what are the U.S.'s interests in Iraq?
I believe the stock phrase is "the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
It's really quite instructive to compare the major US and UK overseas holdings, force commitments, and areas of interest / influence with maps of major shipping routes.
Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat
Post a Comment