I remain utterly unconvinced that Iran is seeking the bomb. Perhaps some Japan-style capability of being able to ramp up a bomb program at short notice, while still retaining IAEA deniability, maybe, but that's the problem with the NPT regime (or one of them anyway).
Otherwise, this is a valuable history lesson for our SoS.
rojo, that addendum is dumb. you would not wet your britches and yet you find the history lesson valuable? i can't understand how you could hold those two opinions concurrently. its perfectly rational for the iranians to seek nuclear weapons. its perfectly rational for the US to try to deter them. but it sure as hell is as scary for another country to be armed with those things and speed up another round of "oh shit, look what they have" as it is stupid for hilary to feign ignorance of iranian motives.
Are you saying I should wet my britches? Why? Do you expect that the Iranians, if they had the bomb, would immediately go dropping it all over the place or hand it to "terrorist" groups? Seems unlikely to me, I'll save my pants-wetting for when those things actually come to pass.
Dude, you're stuff got old a long time ago. You're the perennial naysayer singing the same old tune. And you're not even singing it with the intent of getting anyone to change theirs. You're just doing it because you've got nothing else to do.
If you were to advocate something or other from a fully functioning perspective (not, "we should shut down our military and then, uh, uh... not my problem!") then it would be worth hearing what you have to say and debating its merits. But you won't do that. You just like talking.
And to think that you could have been spared this exposure had you just not have published that doctored photograph of Menachem Begin.
The preference of inaction over action, and of ridicule over 'constructive criticism' are well established as key principles for this blog's owner and his band of merry sycophants.
If the internet ever stops providing anoynmous commenters who pop into comments in order to misuse apostrophes, then I'm taking my coke and going back to Greensburg.
18 comments:
This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass.
I remain utterly unconvinced that Iran is seeking the bomb. Perhaps some Japan-style capability of being able to ramp up a bomb program at short notice, while still retaining IAEA deniability, maybe, but that's the problem with the NPT regime (or one of them anyway).
Otherwise, this is a valuable history lesson for our SoS.
Not that I would wet my britches if they actually did build the bomb.
rojo, that addendum is dumb. you would not wet your britches and yet you find the history lesson valuable? i can't understand how you could hold those two opinions concurrently. its perfectly rational for the iranians to seek nuclear weapons. its perfectly rational for the US to try to deter them. but it sure as hell is as scary for another country to be armed with those things and speed up another round of "oh shit, look what they have" as it is stupid for hilary to feign ignorance of iranian motives.
NPT worked so well for India, Pakistan, Israel, south Africa, brazil, japan, Malaysia and of course those loveable cultists in north Korea.
The original draft, not the watered down final version.
Awesome. As an aside, who knew Mossad agents were so...portly.
The bear/tennis player/Israeli covert assassin look must work for someone.
anon,
Are you saying I should wet my britches? Why? Do you expect that the Iranians, if they had the bomb, would immediately go dropping it all over the place or hand it to "terrorist" groups? Seems unlikely to me, I'll save my pants-wetting for when those things actually come to pass.
Gawd is her mouth open wide!
Was that a still from the facial sequence in the porn loop she made with Rahm?
Zero sum game, bitches. You gotta ask, who has got 5,000 nuclear weapons in their trunk, huh?
Dude, where is your car?
Dude, you're stuff got old a long time ago. You're the perennial naysayer singing the same old tune. And you're not even singing it with the intent of getting anyone to change theirs. You're just doing it because you've got nothing else to do.
If you were to advocate something or other from a fully functioning perspective (not, "we should shut down our military and then, uh, uh... not my problem!") then it would be worth hearing what you have to say and debating its merits. But you won't do that. You just like talking.
And to think that you could have been spared this exposure had you just not have published that doctored photograph of Menachem Begin.
I'll bet you're kicking yourself now.
mnuez
Kicking yourself is harder than it sounds.
Yeah, dude. I mean, if you don't believe in bombing Iran into the ground just because, then what do you believe in?
@mnuez
The preference of inaction over action, and of ridicule over 'constructive criticism' are well established as key principles for this blog's owner and his band of merry sycophants.
Capt'n Obvious
I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT.
I'm just here to entertain myself.
If the internet ever stops providing anoynmous commenters who pop into comments in order to misuse apostrophes, then I'm taking my coke and going back to Greensburg.
Don't desert us, Dear Leader.
Without you spurring us on, our determination to be lazy may falter.
Who knows, we may even ... gasp ... vote!
Capt'n Obvious
Post a Comment