Monday, June 28, 2010

Some. Any. Few. Number. May.

Some experts say that this story relies heavily on vague quantitative adjectives in order to imply that the one or two people with whom the reporter may have spoken represent a substantial professional consensus, whereas a few researchers have even gone so far as to claim that a number of studies strongly suggest that these experts could be correct. One person, who also read the linked Times article, said that it sounded plausible to her. Her husband agreed. "That sounds plausible to me," he said.

Several people, however, proposed that in the absence of empirical, verifiable data, it was important to make highly generalized statements in order to avoid any potential contradictions should someone seek to independently establish the facts. "What we are saying," said one person, "is that it could definitely be this way, unless it is some other way, but either way, it is a serious issue."

Some educators worried about legal liability. "If we have to worry about violating the basic rights of our students, then our ability to protect them will be limited to legal means," said a principal. A parent agreed, noting that "abdicating our responsibilities in order to avoid temporarily awkward interactions with our social peers is getting harder and harder in this world of cell phones and internets."

One thing is for certain. Any number of people are concerned that this may be an issue, and the courts, so far, have ruled only on the merits of cases before them rather than constructing an edifice of exigent legal whatsit through which those who may experience cause for concern can act decisively without fear that others will misinterpret their good intentions.

20 comments:

Jason0x21 said...

Clearly, something must be done.

Lancelot Link said...

IOZ, the longest tenured racist senator is dead at 92, Robert "Gives U th" Byrd. Hate fuels the heart, so how about a proper send off?

Anonymous said...

ioz, you are gonna get such a mean email because of this. mean like woah

stillnotking said...

I can't believe you're so cavalier about the immense nationwide problem of cyber-bullying. I mean, where would we be today if people had dismissed the Satanic ritual abuse epidemic of the 1980s? Forced by the servants of the Dark Lord to squat in our own filth and play Dungeons and Dragons all day, that's where.

timothy said...

I was most appalled by the spineless and moronic parents who wanted the SCHOOL to discipline an alleged text harraser of their daughter, but who would NOT confront the parent of the accused themselves because "they coach sports together."

Jesus, the parents are more immature than the kids.

Mr.Fundamental said...

on you, maybe.

KEn said...

So who knew that the story had to be from the Times merely from IOZ's opening?

"Some experts say that this story relies heavily on vague quantitative adjectives in order to imply that the one or two people with whom the reporter may have spoken represent a substantial professional consensus..."

Do they have a quota to print this kind of shit a couple of times a week or what?

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

Gnu Joizee. That says it all. I still remember defending a school district against claims of "sexual harassment" by a 12-year-old boy against a 12-year-old girl. The acts constituting "harassment" of this Queenie-in-Training (cheerleader, "popular girl"):

* "he sat behind me at a basketball game"

* "he teased me in the classroom by asking me out"

* "he took my favorite pencil from my desk when I got up to get a drink of water"

The parents and the plaintiffs' lawyer swore up and down that this was true SEXUAL harassment, on the order of Glenn Close stalking Michael Douglas in Fatal Attraction.

It was in Bergen County, NJ... same county Ridgewood's in.

Wonder if the stupid shits ever stop to think that the solution might be to BANISH cell phones and their cousins from the school?

duh.

Enron said...

Who knew that the ADL wanted to outlaw bullying?

Happy Jack said...

Who knew that the ADL wanted to outlaw bullying?

Sure, one minute you're on Facebook making fun of some girl's dress, next thing you know, you show up on a blog talking smack about Israel.

drip said...

the solution might be to BANISH cell phones and their cousins from the school

And put those kids in uniforms, too -- grey dungarees for the boys, black burkhas for the girls. Then they could literally say, with real sincerity, "I want a fucking lawyer, man. I want Bill Kunstler." No more abdicating -- only dictating.

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

Because we all know that nothing can be learned in school by children who lack cell phones, smartphones, PDAs.

THE HORRROR of a cell-phone-free school!

THE HORROR!

John said...

I stand again grateful today that I am no longer in seventh grade.

Anonymous said...

Oxtrot as a lawyer...why do I keep picturing the stuttering, inept public defender from My Cousin Vinny?

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

Ahhh, another thread where Nonny stalks me and tries to insult me.

Non-plus, if that's your best comic put-down, I can see why you stick with My Cousin Vinny. Keep them brows low, Joe.

Don't say anything
too profound.
Dumb.
It.
Down.

Anonymous said...

Lulz, Oxy. Nothing as funny as a documented retard trying to come off as a highbrow intellectual. As if your entertainment ranges beyond comic books and Adult Swim.

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

Nonny tries, Nonny fails.

When aiming for a laugh, try to not evoke pity.

Anonymous said...

When aiming for a laugh, try to not evoke pity.

...from the first chapter of Lessons from Oxtrot's Sex Life.

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

For sale, one crystal ball, cracked cloudy and constantly errant. Asking $1,000. Contact Anonymous @ 666-555-1212.

Anonymous said...

great experience, dude! thanks for this great post wow... it's very wonderful report.