Thursday, July 22, 2010

Deception

ATTENTION! If you are some kind of fucking idiot and haven't figured out everything that happens in Inception from the trailers, then spoilers.

The cinematic progenitor of Christopher Nolan's new movie, Inception, is the catastrophically ridiculous Robin Williams vehicle, What Dreams May Come. What it lacks in goofy black guardian angels, it makes up for in its grotesquely impoverished view of the human imagination. Empowered to create one's own reality, the best that anyone can do in What Dreams is plop themselves into your secretary's Best-of-the-Impressionists wall calendar. But Chris Nolan and cinematographer Wally Pfister--and really, was there ever a more apropos name?--can't even manage Monet. The visual experience of Inception left me with the distinct impression that I had been drugged by a circa-1999 Tom Ford for Gucci ad and then mercilessly date-raped by his shiny partner, a Lexus commercial. I kept expecting "The Relentless Pursuit of Perfection" to dash across the screen in some boldly sans-serif font. I kept expecting the lease options.

The setup of Inception is supposed to be a brain-teaser. Leonardo DiCaprio and his Jerry Bruckheimer band of specialists (The Chemist, the Forger, the Architect . . . Oh, Lord) invade people's dreams and steal their ideas, or in the case of the central action in this instance, plant a bug of a new idea in someone's brain. Here, they are trying to convince the sharp-jawed, Savile-row scion of some kind of Charles Foster Kane energy executive that what he really wants to do is break up his dad's monopoly. This all has something to do with Ken Watanabe, who runs a rival company? Whatever. The movie doesn't care. Because the fundamental conflict that drives the entire narrative is so hastily and poorly sketched, the dour, totalitarian porentousness of the proceedings seems more than a tad overwrought. Well, this is Christopher Nolan, after all, who played a story about a man who dresses up like a bat in order to karate-chop Bond villians with a straighter face than a community-theater production of Lear, so I'm not sure what else I expected. Inception trips in at well over two hours, which according to the exhaustively-repeated conceit of the film itself is well over a billion years of dream-time, and it contains a single joke. I counted. It involved Joseph Gordon-Levitt, whose high, tight ass is the only thing I recall fondly of my wasted time in the theater, and Ellen Page sharing a brief kiss, and the whole movie seems ashamed of it. This is serious.

Anyway, the differing speed of the passage of time is just a part of the larger conceit, which is that not only can Leonardo et al. invade dreams, but that by descending into ever-deeper states of unconsciousness, they can concoct dreams-within-dreams. Even as action/scifi fare this is pretty thin gruel, and since Nolan insists on cluttering the goings-on with pages and pages of expository dialogue full of crackpot ontology and two-joint epistemological impoderables, the whole edifice reeks faintly of the ridiculous. In his silly but entertaining Existenz, which had the misfortune to come out opposite The Matrix, Croneberg managed with much greater ease and humor to trip the lysergical-acidic borders of multiple mind-states and alternate consciousness. In Inception, dreams sit neatly within dreams like Matryoshka dolls, everything just-so, ascent and descent symbolized by Leonardo DiCaprio's rickety dream-elevator (no, really), which, obviously, plies a linear path from top to bottom. By the way, this constant mentioning of other movies is intentional. Inception is the most derivative film ever made, so shameless in its cribbing that you'd think it were meant as pastiche, except for its relentless, monotonous self-seriousness.

The characters in Inception keep asking each other if they remember how they got there, there being here, or there, or where they are, or whatever, the point being that “in a dream,” three words repeated with talismanic frequency, as if the filmmakers thought we might forget, you only ever find yourself in media res, with no recollection of how you arrived at the bar, so to speak. It was a familiar feeling. As the movie dragged into its third hour, I began to feel something similar myself. How did I get here? and, Please let this all be a dream. The punishing score, which Hans Zimmer ripped off from Eyes Wide Shut, drones at merciless volume throughout, and by the time Joseph Gordon-Levitt was floating around weightlessly and everyone else was attacking Cobra Commander's arctic lair (no, really), I thought I might burst an eardrum. Ellen Page, who sometime in the first hour demonstrated a remarkable capacity to fold dream-Paris back on itself and generally bend reality like Neo meets MC Escher is along for the ride, but doesn't actully do anything once the action gets underway, other than harrass DiCaprio for imprisonining his memory of his dead wife in, um, the basement? In the hotel room where she committed suicide. Jesus Christ, Nolan, eat a fucking muffin. Schindler's List had more laughs. By the way, the wife-in-the-limbo-of-her-own-imagining, that too is ripped off from What Dreams May Come. Inception isn't a movie. It's an exquisite corpse. A mash-up.

The visual effects have been widely praised, but I found them dull and uninspired. The whole film is flat, colorless, and corporate. My dreams are a lot less Prada and a lot more Alexander McQueen, if you know what I'm saying. Everything is shot at flat angles, and the interminable gun battles and hallway fisticuffs are filmed with so much quick-cutting that you can't tell who's punching whom or shooting what, especially in the big alpine shootout (ripped off from about seven different Bond numbers, the opening of True Lies, Ice Station Zebra, etc.), where everyone, good and bad alike, is dressed in identical white parkas and face masks! The Matrix was dumb, but it was true to its comic-book-meets-kung-fu aesthetic and actually gave us a few full karate chops before the camera cut away, and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, whose wire-based aerial combat is also ripped off, was filmed almost entirely in balletic long-shot. Well, everyone's metallic threads glint and do not wrinkle, the men wear spread collars, and Marion Cotillard wanders around wondering what she's doing here, especially as the strains of Je ne regrette rien keep rising in the ghostly background. I would take this as a quirky, metafictive joke, except this is a Christopher Nolan movie, and the rare joke sticks out like Spock at the Funnybone.

I suppose I could list the other movies and moviemakers that Nolan shamelessly rips off. The Wizard of Oz. Miyazaki. Michael Mann. Oh, why bother. Inception is dull, overlong, sexless, and unimaginative. It is a $200 million car commercial, a glossy magazine photo. You give yourself license to create whole worlds from the stuff of pure consciousness, and the best you can come up with is a corner café in Paris and the generic cityscape of Gotham City? Christopher Nolan, you are ripping off your own stupid movies! "If you die this deep, you'll end up in limbo," DiCaprio warns. Oh, let's repeat the adverb. Portentously. Pass me the pistol, brother. I'm going in.

63 comments:

KEn said...

So.....thumbs down then?

Montag said...

Ken Watanabe?! dangit, i thought it was Gedde Watanabe.

i'm not going if Long Duk Dong isn't in it.

ts said...

My impression on reading the previews was, "Why the hell didn't they just make Ubik?"

Dan said...

Wait...what was the spoiler?

Christopher Nolan said...

Fuck you man. If you don't like my fuckin' music get your own fuckin' cab!

Anonymous said...

All that analysis, all that intellectual firepower tearing down Nolan's construction, and yet you find yourself so compelled by the persuasiveness of his deception that you didn't grasp the joke he played on the audience - on you.

Go see the movie again, and ask yourself why Nolan would include such unbelievable elements in the story. Pay attention to all of the little hints he leaves about the nature of the conflict Cobb's character is stuck in, and what it implies about cognitive distortions, and the ways in which we imbue ambiguous reality with meaning.

You didn't appreciate the movie because you didn't get the movie. Bummer for you, Ioz, because this one's going to have a long tail. The entire movie is a joke, and at the moment, the joke's on you.

IOZ said...

"It's all an elaborate joke!" A joke with a punchline about "cognitive distortions and the ways in which we imbue ambiguous reality with meaning." Rectum, I coulda killed him!

Michael Dawson said...

Has there ever been a worthwhile sentence that included the word "inbue?"

I avoided this movie, which is running at the little theater across the street from my apartment, because it looked like a DiCaprio vehicle, and DiCaprio is in the major leagues of over-rated-ness.

Thanks for the useful spoiler/confirmation.

Anonymous said...

Heh heh. Kinda' bugs you when you don't get something, huh?

LA Confidential Pantload said...

So....the message of this movie is "wherever you go, there you are?"

Anonymous said...

More along the lines of, "When you're certain of where you are, question your certainty." Unsurprising those inclined to strongly-held, quickly formed opinions have trouble getting it (a punchline that continues to play out over time).

Christopher said...

Imbue, imbue... I don't think that's a word, Sam.

I guess put me in the "I don't get it" camp.

I think this is a movie that sort of suffers from the previews. They say you're going to a movie where Leonardo Dicaprio goes into people's dreams and Ellen Page starts folding cities in half, but as far as I could tell, the main point of that scene is to explain why Page won't be folding any cities up for the rest of the movie, and why Leo won't actually be going into people's dreams.

Maybe there's a message there? Page's character is recruited to the job with the promise that she can engage in "pure creation" and then is almost immediately told "Oh, but don't go too crazy".

Anyway, I can handle Inception better if I think of it as, like, a monster movie, or even better, one of those Asimov robot stories. There's no way there could be such a thing as a vampire, and nothing even approaching a logical reason why the traits "immune to bullets, only eats blood, and bursts into flames when put in direct sunlight" would all find themselves in the same being. There is no way that the three laws of robotics would really govern all robots.

But you just accept that in a monster movie or Asimov story you're going to get a series of arbitrary rules and an exploration of all the rules.

If you think of Inception as just a heist movie with an exceptionally bizarre and arbitrary set of rules, then it really comes off better. I mean, it's no Ocean's 11 or nothing, but it's still not too bad.

But of course, you really can't help but compare it to the Matrix or Dark City or whatever, and I honestly don't know what Inception does in terms of imbuing reality with whatever that wasn't already done better by those movies.

IOZ said...

We got a live one. Ahahah.

IOZ: This movie is full of crackpot ontology and two-joint epistemological impoderables, [and] the whole edifice reeks faintly of the ridiculous.

Anonymous Internet Commenter: When you're certain of where you are, question your certainty. PWN!

LULZ^4

Needless to say, everyone with a pulse got that Nolan was trying to say something about, ahem, "ambiguous reality." Lord only knows, he applied that shit with a trowel. We are just saying that it's ridiculous, asinine, juvenile, poorly conceived, preposterously constructed, full of holes, and not very interesting.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, well, some people are more invested in perceiving, and more people are invested in analyzing. The "joke" is for the benefit of the former camp, at the expense of the latter. More technically, it's an exposition of radical subjectivity masquerading as intersubjectivity.

If you find things like that interesting (particularly if you have some sense of your own foibles in such matters) you'll appreciate the movie. If you don't, you're more likely to be one of those people who finds themselves on the internet all the time, making the same set of observations, and having the same arguments with the same people.

On that note, I think I'll go have less fun for more tangible satisfactions elsewhere, and leave you to further elaborate your argument for why this movie sucks yourself.

The Mathmos said...

Haven't seen the movie, but these "question your certainty!!1!" thriller-thingies are so done to death. Anybody has seen dozens of those.

If it's really what it comes down to, the movie should at least acknowledge the fundamental by-now-kitsch of the whole thing. A bit like Doomsday being an overt pastiche of 80s John Carpenter action fares, with no claims to seriousness.

From what IOZ says, Nolan is playing it straight, which is unambiguously poor taste.

rowan said...

As Bertrand Russel said about Aristotle's critique of Plato - I don't know if I'd agree with IOZ, but Anonymous's critique of him are liable to push me that way. "You don't get it, man" is the best you can do?

Montag said...

aaahh! the old exposition of radical subjectivity masquerading as intersubjectivity bit. that joke is hilarious!

it's not me, it's you. i'm taking my cocaine and going back to greensburg.

IOZ said...

I've been questioning my certainty since No Way Out. Commander Farrel is Yuri! Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

Michael Dawson said...

This is awesome, actually! Some good is coming from this awesome turd of a wallet-drain!

A practicer of "radical subjectivity" who denounces people that can't stop saying the same trite thing over and over. Especially on the internet, where the radical subber's point is making it (to borrow the pomo style) app-pearance!

And, yes, that all of us isn't it? Getting more and more certain about where we are when we enter into places that confuse us... I've never been to Seoul before...hmm...How do I get to the park...I know! I'll just assume I know my way around, or that this is really northeast Portland, Oregon.

Erteater said...

Crap...this discussion got me looking through IMDb and I see that they are going to do Brave New World and , and DiCaprio is involved with both. Why can't they just make sequels of movies based on comic books and leave me alone!

davidly said...

Nothing like a spoiler with a good punchline!

LA Confidential Pantload said...

We know where the radical subjectivity is; it's east, south, north, and west of Baghdad somewhat?

All your radical subjectivities are belong to us?

If there's a joke in there somewhere, it's more constipated than George Will.

Mr.Fundamental said...

oh go stare at a autostereogram, you piddling twit.

shorter anon: IOZ, clearly you don't see the image in the picture. you're a fool!

IOZ: no, dude, clearly I saw the image in the picture. it was, yet again, another dinosaur. lame.

Anonymous said...

"it's an exposition of radical subjectivity masquerading as intersubjectivity."

lol

i'm off to the realm of pure perception, everyone.

Anonymous said...

Shorter Mr Fun, always:

Faaaart. Burp. Skritch skritch skritch.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Fundie, you've almost got it. We're told to expect a dinosaur. Reviewers are writing about seeing dinosaurs. Ioz saw a dinosaur. But seeing the dinosaur is the joke - it's not even a particularly pleasing dinosaur.

It's the mandala the dinosaur is embedded in that's interesting. That people aren't seeing it is, in fact, Nolan's intent (though I wonder if he anticipated such successful misdirection).

Quick mandala-seeing quiz: why did Cobb, until the final scene, refuse to look at his children's faces?

Rumpleforeskin said...

IOZ is just grumpy for not being invited to Netroots Nation.

ts said...

It's fine if you question your certainty. Just don't smother your ontology.

demize! said...

Oh Christ I knew a fucking Mandala was involved here somehow.

IOZ said...

Impossible. He was at the World Cup. Unless... unless it was all a dream!

IOZ said...

Also, what is the light in Marsellus Wallace's briefcase?

LA Confidential Pantload said...

"Quick mandala-seeing quiz: why did Cobb, until the final scene, refuse to look at his children's faces?"

To get to the other side?

Enron said...

All the Dude wanted was his undies back.

IOZ said...

How many times did I tell them we need locking mechanisms on the doors of perception!

Justin said...

Nony,
The Socratic thing isn't working very well for two reasons.

1. This is an internet comments thread. Maybe it could work in a live chat, maybe. Never works in comments and never will. You'd have better luck playing a game of chess in a comments thread. Pawn, E4.

2. No one gives a shit.

3. Just state your take on the film already so we can debate your points and eventually call each other Nazis.

LA Confidential Pantload said...

IOZ,

I haven't seen the movie - is he supposed to be looking at his children's faces or their feces?

Montag said...

LA Confidential, there's only one way to be positive if they have been eating the West Indian lilac... I have to see the dinosaur's droppings.

wait, what movie is this?

IOZ said...

The Hegelian Diuretic.

Anonymous said...

The movie is a bloated piece of shit. I took the afternoon off thinking it would be something like Ubik.


It was shocking how bad it was and also the fawning in reviews which, as I most always do, read after the fact. I'm thankful to IOZ for going throught the film, it was such a fucking yawner I didn't even bother trying to parse the thing. The radical subjectivity is that it's a wealth extractor and knows it?

The half intended self reflexivity of Inception is nauseating. Conceived of on cocktail napkins during ny to la red eye trips while you're banging your assistant and wanting to divorce your wife. We're giving Nolan too much credit.

It's most likely that the film's inception occurred when a few Hollywood hacks thought that if they put a bunch of guns and James Bond scenes into a Charlie Kaufman flick they'd fill their bank accounts. They were right.

For collective mass projections, dream states, rituals etc. see Sans Soleil.

davidly said...

"Quick mandala-seeing quiz: why did Cobb, until the final scene, refuse to look at his children's faces?"

Cuz 'e didn't wanna get stuck behind the pervert.

rowan said...

The Prestige, which is a fun Nolan film, also kind of got weighted down with its explanation. There was a really interesting "are you sure it's not really x?" possibility, but rewatching demonstrated "no, it's a straightforward film with a twist at the end."

fish said...

More technically, it's an exposition of radical subjectivity masquerading as intersubjectivity.

Yeah, but if you posit Newton's laws in a rotating system, you will see centrifugal force does, in fact exist.

IOZ said...

At least The Prestige had Tesla, and I will watch, literally Joe Biden, anything with Nikola Tesla.

Anonymous said...

And yet for some reason Nolan is THE SHIT, while M Knight Shyamalan gets shat on.

IOZ said...

Well, to be fair, I don't believe that Nolan has ever employed Mel Gibson.

bicentennial man said...

foibles, imbue, mandala...oh my!

mds said...

"At least The Prestige had Tesla, and I will watch, literally Joe Biden, anything with Nikola Tesla."

More to the point, it had David Bowie playing Tesla, which was so completely wrong it went clear around and became right again.

Anyway, though I feel somewhat sorry for Despicable Me, I'm glad to see The Sorcerer's Apprentice: Max Merlin Gets Groovy and Mormon Angst III get slapped around at the box office. That it's apparently by the cinematic equivalent of curling linoleum makes it all the sweeter.

Picador said...

There seem to be about four different reactions to Christopher Nolan movies, e.g. Memento:

1. Sort of interesting, guy has amnesia, whatever.

2. It was derivative and full of plot holes! Amnesia doesn't even work like that! Nolan sucks!

3. Dude, nobody in the movie has amnesia. That's the point. Did you even watch the last five scenes? Who exactly do you think Guy Pierce's character is, and what actually happened to his wife? It was brilliant!

4. Yeah, I did get all of that... it's still not that interesting.

I'm somewhere between 4 and 5. I can't tell if IOZ is at 3 or 5. In any case, I'll probably go and see Inception next week, but I honestly don't know whether I'll enjoy it.

At least The Prestige had Tesla, and I will watch, literally Joe Biden, anything with Nikola Tesla.

Yeah, without Bowie Tesla, it was only mildly interesting.

mds said...

"I'm somewhere between 4 and 5."

There are four reactions.

Picador said...

Heh. Bad with numbers. I'm between 3 and 4. IOZ seems to be at 4, but I'm suprised by how often people I assume to be at 4 are actually at 2. (Which isn't to say that the 2s couldn't transform into 4s once they understand what the movie was about.)

Is Christopher Nolan an amazing groundbreaking director? Probably not. Are his movies more interesting than the other action-movie fare out there? Sure. But come on, let's not kid ourseves that the stakes are any higher than that.

George Jones said...

My favorite part: the rich heir's dream father was clearly on the Holodeck.

It was Moriarty all along!

John said...

My thinking on this case has gotten really uptight.

Anonymous said...

I quite liked it and my IQ is at least 9000.

Also that's a Hyundai Genesis that Country DiCaprio is driving in New Angeles or wherever, not a Lexus.

Anonymous said...

DiCaprio rules. He's no Mark Wahlberg, but he's good and you need to deal with that.

Anonymous said...

DiCaprio rules. He's no Mark Wahlberg, but he's good and you need to deal with that.

John Sabotta said...

I have a simple set of rules about these matters:

1. Was the film under consideration made sometime in the last fifteen years (or, alternatively, since the widespread adoption of digital special effects?)

2. Is it a "Hollywood" film?

If the answers to these questions are "yes" then I conclude that the film in question is a worthless piece of shit.

Saves me a lot of money.

Anonymous said...

Sorry for my bad english. Thank you so much for your good post. Your post helped me in my college assignment, If you can provide me more details please email me.

Anonymous said...

thanks for this tips
pmu
turf

Anonymous said...

brinkka2011 says: How is it that just anyone can publish a blog and get as popular as this? Its not like youve said anything incredibly impressive more like youve painted a quite picture through an issue that you know nothing about! I dont want to sound mean, right here. But do you genuinely think that you can get away with adding some quite pictures and not truly say something?

Diablo III Gold said...

Wonderful recipe! I've commenced generating my own, personal washing cleaning soap simply not too long ago : and find it irresistible -- along with have a pretreatment bottle of spray : They are EASY elements that i'm going to provide this a try!!! Appreciate your submitting that! buy D3 Gold



Guild Wars 2 Gold

Anonymous said...

Die erste ist d3 gold die Dampscale Basilisk Eye. Diese Dinge sind für Reputation verwendet Turn-in und kann so viel wie 3 WoW Gold pro Stück im Auktionshaus wert. Der beste Ort, um sie versammeln sich im nördlichen Teil der Wälder von Terokkar. Jede der Basilisken in diesem Bereich eine Chance haben, sie fallen zu lassen.Cloth Punkt ist die erste Sache, diablo 3 gold buy die im Preis geändert hat. Wolle und magewaeve Tuch geworden das teuerste Tuch im Auktionshaus. Dies ist definitiv eines der besten WoW Gold machen Geheimnisse, weil diese Begriffe immer sehr gefragt sind. Die Menschen sind ständig sie zu kaufen, aber es gibt nicht genug Leute Landwirtschaft ihnen. Wenn Sie diese Farm und legte sie auf das Auktionshaus, diablo 3 schnell gold machen können Sie eine Menge von WoW Gold zu machen.

cheap gw2 gold said...

More along the lines of, "When you're certain of where you are, question your certainty." Unsurprising those inclined to strongly-held, quickly formed opinions have trouble getting it (a punchline that continues to play out over time).

gw2 gold

Anonymous said...

Each zits sufferer needs to have an eco friendly-dependent concealer in their collection of items within the combat with acne breakouts. Even if you are presently employing products to take care of acne, you will still locate a breakout every so often. The environmentally friendly hue of the concealer will combat from the reddish shade of the zit. Make sure you mix well, as you do not want to have a oddly shaded polka-dotted experience! For males, a basic approach to decrease back pain is to obtain that pocket away from your again wallet! Should you be similar to most gentlemen, that again pocket was just meant for your finances, regardless how chock-filled of credit cards, invoices and funds it may be. The problem is that finances can be the reason for lots of back pain as it alterations your posture and challenges your back. Shift your pocket to a top wallet, and you'll see a significant difference. Trying to keep the mouth area nice and clean while you're experiencing chemotherapy is essential when you aspire to avoid against mouth area ulcers and even teeth decrease. Neglecting to appropriately look after the mouth area can cause tissues inside of your oral cavity to swiftly split and in essence rip the mouth area. Typical oral cavity scrub can avoid this. This has have got to be one of the most detrimental occasions to identify a task you will find merely less and fewer possibilities available. There may be expect, nonetheless, and the adhering to post may help. It's filled with useful tips that may demonstrate clever means of attaining interviews and getting chosen. Read on! Be picky concerning the factors which you include in your photo. Go on and take away anything from the image that doesn't should be there or makes the framework appear unbalanced. Use panning photos that maintain your subject in concentrate but blur the background when you can't take away all undesirable interruptions through your chance. Stay away from using online payday loans out, if you are already mired inside a economic crisis. When you find yourself having problems making comes to an end meet up with, it seems that here is the right time for any pay day loan. Even so, the borrowed funds is just the first step. You should also pay it again, as well as costs, along with a big rate of interest. If you fail to afford to pay the financial loan off with your upcoming income, a payday advance is not really a wise thought.
http://joshua.godembassy.org/images/guest/index.php?showuser=3511
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1170107167
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1170107167
http://zamok-markizy.kiev.ua/images/guest/index.php?showuser=5702
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1435583192