"Is it possible for me to have more objections to a paragraph than there are words in it?"This in response to an Obsidian Wings post in which it is posited that America is a "Utopian Society," on its way upward and onward, foreward and farther toward "a middle-class egalitarian meritocratic democracy." And yea, the lion shall lay down with the lamb. How one squares "egalitarian" with "meritocratic" is wholly beyond me; the very notion of merit, let alone of a meritocracy, implies a neat ordering of human beings by innate ability and willingness to strive. I understand that modern liberalism is basically crackpot Rawlsianism, that what is meant by "egalitarian" has mostly to do with giving every boy and girl a fair shake at a college scholarship, but still, those words sit together as uncomfortably as military intelligence, or Christian charity. (And let's not even dip into how the technocratic-scientific rubrics of merit measurement conflict with small-d democracy. We haven't got all day.) Even assuming it were possible, and possible in these here United States, a society of universal Bachelors of the Arts, paid maternity leave, and third-rail social security hardly represents an "achievable perfection." It suggests a modestly preferable alternative to the Congo, perhaps, but hardly the Kingdom come.
-Ethan at 6th or 7th
Friday, July 23, 2010
Do What Thou Wilt, That Shall Be the Whole of the Suggested Guidelines
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
23 comments:
Oh dear god, Obsidian Wings is possibly the worst place on the internet, the absolute asshole of netrootsian self-regard.
And if you're like me, getting tired of making fun of Digby and PZ Myers and Melissa McEwan over and over again, it's a great next step.
ioz, thanks for the link! Or whatever the etiquette is.
" a society of universal Bachelors of the Arts, paid maternity leave, and third-rail social security "
Oh boy. Mine. I buy. You are done! Where do I sign?
Dude, don't you want to live in an "exuberant" society? What are you, some kind of exuberophobe?
So meritocracy is the new Great Chain of Being?
"it's a great next step."
Oh, please, no. I don't think I could take it; my brain bleeds enough from exposure to Digby and Yglesias as it is.
Speaking of the Peaceable Kingdom, where the lion lies down with the lamb,
http://tinyurl.com/23sdbru
there's a story of a carnival sideshow exhibit that had exactly that. So the local reporter was interviewing the owner, and asked, "Is there ever any trouble between them?" "No, not really. Once in a while they have a minor disagreement, but new lambs aren't expensive."
Unexpectedly, knowing nothing of what to expect, downtown St Louis was a spectacular metropolis rising out of an endless plain; the civic buildings rival the Parthenon, as if they were built for a 1,000 year civilization; the arch is pure industrial exuberance, a 600 foot tall sign that says "We built it because we could".
Unexpectedly, knowing nothing of what to expect, this sentence was a spectacular disaster.
Way to miss the point, IOZ. OW is writing about a dinosaur, Ethan is responding to a dinosaur, and now you are taking the dinosaur at face value. Meanwhile, what OW is really doing is focusing on the mandala.
Quick question: why is OW only writing about taxes in this utopia at the very end of the post?
P.S. If you answer that last question, you are halfway through the looking glass-mandala construct that OW has inhabited, existentially speaking, of course. Keep trying!
The lamb thing was actually a carnival tableaux called "happy families" or something, the question was "aren't there any problems?" and the answer "not as long as I continue to get a new lamb each morning"
Leonard, compared to where we are, let alone where we are headed, IOZ's description looks pretty damn exuberant to me. I don't know how it compares to Congo, having never lived there, but compared to this shitturd, wow, man, utopia.
Doesn't "middle class" imply the existence of class; therefore different classes; therefore an unegalitarian society? This is so confusing...
Doesn't "middle class" imply the existence of class; therefore different classes; therefore an unegalitarian society? This is so confusing...
Except for Warren Buffet or Sam Walton or whoever it is this week, and another guy rummaging through dumpsters in Flint, everybody is middle class.
-- sglover
Maybe it's because I'm young, but I really don't understand America's bottomless self-congratulation for not being ruled by "pharoahs".
I mean, Egypt isn't even ruled by a Pharoah anymore.
It's like being proud that we use the wheel to its fullest extent.
"Doesn't "middle class" imply the existence of class; therefore different classes; therefore an unegalitarian society? This is so confusing..."
The Puritans specifically excluded both the upper and lower classes of England from immigrating to their settlement. They may well have viewed themselves as middle class because they still had the folk-memory of the English class system.
until Obama produces a birth certificate, i don't think we should rule out the possibility that he is a Pharaoh.
Obviously both you and Ethan are not golfers.
...the real Donny.
those words sit together as uncomfortably as ... Christian charity
Monsieur. Monsieur? Ye oldie biases showing? One group of inmates laughing at the "others", the whipping boys du jour?
Capt'n Obvious
I'll second the knock on "Christian charity", but blow past that by noting that the title, which somehow I missed until now, is a work of genius. IOZ, I salute you.
Thanks Leonard, I've been storing it up for a while.
"a Middle-class EGAlitarian MERitocratic DEmocracy."
A Mega-merde?
Montag, that made my Monday.
Post a Comment