It would be tasteless to suggest that for all the bluster and hectoring phrase-makeing of his famous book, what really appealed to Allan Bloom about his perfect fantasy university was that it consisted of lush young men lying about in bed sheets, drinking wine from bowls, respitefully free of female troubles. (Quite unlike my own fantasy university, which consists of a blast crater.) Bloom's conservative adopters focus on his defense of the canon, which they've heard features several prominent People Not of Color, and ignore the seminaryish air with its soupçon of priestly ephebophilia wafting over the carrel walls. Anyway, Bloom was always honest about the elite-making charter of the academe. He openly urged his students to abandon their families and religion. To join the higher ranks of the illuminati, a man should de-class and deracinate; the baggage of prior prejudices must be left before the jetway.
I thought fondly of old old Bloom when reading Ross Douthat's latest contribution to the alumni magazine, in which he laments the failure of Harvard to admit more "aspiring farmers." What? Really. Within narrow--very narrow--limits, Douthat does make the reasonable point that 4-H is just as good as the debate team, and I am sure that it's true that poor and rural whites are the most underrepresented population in the Cambridge cosmopolis. However:
If such universities are trying to create an elite as diverse as the nation it inhabits, they should remember that there’s more to diversity than skin color — and that both their school and their country might be better off if they admitted a few more R.O.T.C. cadets, and a few more aspiring farmers."An elite as diverse as the nation it inhabits." Oh my. Now quite plainly the process whereby one transforms from affirmative action student to elite meritocrat involves sloughing off one's class and race, forgoing solidarity (except where strategically useful, cf. "Yes We Can"), and renovating oneself as a member of a new class. That is the nature of the elite, and that is the nature of the meritocracy. The emperor need not be born in Rome, and all that. Look at Barack Obama, or better yet, look at Bill Clinton, the man from Hope, y'all.
In any case, within the social circles of the American ruling class, there is plenty of comparative status anxiety, and I am sure that Pat Buchanan, who merely went to Georgetown, really does believe that Middle America suffers deep psychic wounds as a result of the Ivy League's failure to actively recruit more Cletuses and Lurlenes. (This Buchananian thesis is the ostensible jumping-off point for Douthat's column.) Douthat takes this spoonful of sugar and spins it into an airy pink cloud of cotton candy. Underrepresentation at Harvard is actually the proximate cause of race paranoia in the white middle- and underclass. I know the Ivies work hard to instill their culture of institutional narcicism in undergrads, but even from a guy like Douthat, this is a bit much.
White anxiety results from the economic pressures of post-industrial America, from the perception that changing demographics are reducing the relative importance of whites. The stagnation of real wages, the end of lifetime employment, the economic devastation of small cities and towns, and so on all contribute to the feeling that they are besieged. Racism and cultural resentment are whipped and manipulated by political and media elites--there is that word again--in order to forestall and undermine class solidarity. I mean, not to get too conspiratorial on you, but Martin Luther King didn't get shot when he was talking about Negroes; he got shot when he started talking about the poor. Cultural resentment is an institutional mechanism, perhaps the institutional mechanism, through which Douthat's elites maintain their status and refocus the energies of a restive public, who might otherwise be inclined to blow up the G-20 or what have you.
13 comments:
Those rich fucks! This whole fucking thing --
Wen Harvurd exceps me in theyr auto mekanix diggry progrim than evverthang wull be awwrite.
--Mingo Jackson, head wrench at Billy Bob's Fuel & Fixings.
IOZ nails it in one.
The One[TM] [btw and apropos of nothing, my own college classmate at alleged Ivy League member Columbia College] comes to us c/o The Pu'na'hau School (or however it's spelled), an elite prep school in Honolulu, and notwithstanding The One[TM]'s protestations to the contrary of having gone there "on scholarship", his Kenyan father sported a Harvard Ph.D., and he was largely raised by his White grandparents, his White grandmother being vice-president of a bank.
The Clenis[TM], by contrast, is entirely self-made. No other way to say it; just saying, anyway.
The real affirmative action group at Hahvahd, Yale, et al. are people like the last President: dunderheaded but nonehteless well connected White people like the Bushes or Kennedy's (let's be bipartisan!) who, indeed, if they're the Bushes, anyway, then immediately purport to bash "the cultural elite" (notwithstanding their own card-carrying membership in it.)
In the American context, race has always been played beautifully to prevent full-blown class-consciousness. For the elites to play it any other way, in the immortal words of the President right before The Clenis[TM]... "wouldn't be prudent."
Link's busted, dude.
This one will work better, I hope.
Anyone here ever read John Taylor Gatto?
I'm 20 pages or so into Weapons of Mass Instruction and am having trouble separating some of his crazier stuff from his main thesis.
Is it worth finishing?
why the hell would an aspiring farmer want to go to Harvard? The hell's wrong with UMass-Aggie in Waltham?
(To answer my own rhetorical: Douthat still believes, as so many Harvard grads do, that a sheepskin from Harvard is an end in itself, not a means to some greater end. Douthat's like Susan Pevensie in C.S. Lewis's The Last Battle: he spent all his life rushing to age 22, and will now spend the rest of his life trying to stay there)
With the demise of grades, standardized testing, and objective merit, our Harvards must find a new paradigm for assessing qualifications for elite colleges and universities. "Standards" must be maintained, of course, but not at the expense of Social Justice, as defined and enforced by the dread mandarins of the Cult of the Lowest Common Denominator.
Proper distribution of Golden Tickets in "Ivy League" Wonka bars would be too difficult to engineer, for the usual reasons, and is too similar to current practice. Name-changes to Hogvard and Dartwarts and admission by owlgram also seems fraught with logistical difficulties. Perhaps demographically qualified toddlers taken from mothers to be prepped for Ivy League matriculation? The old ways are always best.
"The emperor need not be born in Rome, and all that. Look at Barack Obama, or better yet, look at Bill Clinton, the man from Hope, y'all.
"
Ah YOZ, you came so close, so close ...
To the Holy Grail of making a meaningful pun involving Barack Obama and "barracks emperors" ...
I know you have it in you ... please try ...
"Quite unlike my own fantasy university, which consists of a blast crater ..."
..., one subsequently colonized by lush young men lying about in bed sheets, drinking wine from bowls, respitefully free of female troubles.
Yes, the progressive intellectual elite is not ideologically diverse. They are progressives: duh! Their ideas span the spectrum of opinion from 'A' to 'B'. You know that, I know that, they know it, and Douthat knows it. But the proles don't know it -- you know, the aspiring farmers and such. Traditional Christians. They think that 'C' -- Christ! -- is a valid opinion.
It is a professed item of faith among that elite that any socially significant subset of Americans must be racially diverse. This creed they have made the law. They always talk about "diversity" as a racial code-phrase, and also sometimes as meaning including subgroups. They do not use it as meaning ideological inclusion, nor (generally) cultural. (The occasional wise latina's vague latinness was much less at issue than her femaleness and non-whiteness.) By contrast the appeal of "diversity" to the proles is its apparent fairness and inclusivity. That is, the proles support "diversity" as being inclusive in all ways. That does include as one aspect being racially inclusive, even though they don't particularly like that aspect of it. You cannot make that sale to them without relying on the larger, common-sense meaning of diversity, specifically, a sort of inclusion which also includes them.
Now, the political opinions of proles are pretty unimportant. There's a good reason why we have unelected judges, an independent civil service neither elected nor appointed, and undemocratic private press and universities. But nonetheless, due to vestigial democracy, prole opinion still does matter somewhat. They might pass a law requiring cultural diversity, and it is hard to see how such a law could be stopped, if it ever got to be popular enough to get past all those other gatekeepers.
Thus, Douthat's meaning is clarified. He is saying: look here, I demand more proles at Harvard. If you won't cease and desist the clear discrimination against prole kids, then I'll raise hell with the proles about what you actually mean by diversity. Are you progressives ready to defend the idea that diversity does not include cultural diversity? 'Cause I think I can win that fight!
It's the Harvard-Yale game, and two hunky undergraduates enter the men's room at the same time to urinate. They finish, and one goes to the sink while the other strolls toward directly toward the door. The Harvard boy says, "At Harvard they teach us to wash our hands after urination." The Yale man breezily replies, "At Yale they teach us not to pee on our hands."
Holy smokes! I'm coming here more often. Youse guys're awful funny. Schmaht, too. Hm. Great thoughts, folks, really. I'm impressed. But, then, maybe I've spent too many years in the hinterlands and have emerged easily impressionable. Never mind. Keep it up. Someone's gotta notice this stuff. All those rich trouser stains (as opposed to the other, more personable kind...) will, I hope, go the way of the line of humanity that died out in "Idiocracy".
Hey, a guy can hope, can't he???
demise of grades, standardized testing, etc.? yer batshit crazy!
Post a Comment