The most damaging actual effect of such an outcome, one few people have focused on yet, is that once Republicans gain the chairmanships of House committees, they will begin launching investigation after investigation into the Obama administration, for example on charges that the Justice Department has shown racial favoritism in refusing to prosecute the New Black Panther Party of Philadelphia for alleged electoral irregularities. These will have little or no meaningful basis in fact but will attempt to distract the administration from its policy objectives, make it look dirty, and with any luck catch a big fish on the hook of perjury or obstruction of justice. (Look for the theme of “Chicago-style thuggery,” which was bandied about here and there earlier but never quite caught on outside the right-wing echo chamber, to reemerge.) The Republicans play to win.Didn't the New York Review of Books, you know, review books at some point? Now it privileges perorations on the DANGERS of RETHUGLICANS. The whole thing reads like a Kos diary. "Distract the administration from its policy objectives"! The humanity!
-Michael Tomasky
By my scientific count, Michael Tomasky is the one million three hundred thousand six hundred and seventy-eighth person to make each and every one of the observations contained in the excerpted article, which is to do what the Donk generally does and elevate banality to a cardinal virtue; to make stating the obvious a fundamental principle. As liberal commenters scratch their heads over why the Democrats fail to articulate the case for their own perpetual stewardship of all good things here on this green earth forever and ever, praise be, the real mechanism of the factional duopoly is perfectly plain. Party-in-power tradeoffs lend the illusion of democratic legitimacy, and meanwhile, once more for the cheap seats: Republicans drive the empire; Democrats consolidate and rationalize what their partners have wrought. George Bush expands the global gulag; Barack Obama writes the employee handbook. The Republicans promise billions to the banks; the Democrats do the accounting. It's not a competition; it's a partnership.
But it's a silent partnership, and guys like Tomasky serve an important function. By emphasizing falsely differing interests on either side, they obscure the fundamental collaboration at work. It's a strategy as old as business. Two secret partners negotiate from opposite sides against the poor suckers in the middle, who think they're going to get a good deal playing one side against the other, but who only get played instead.
14 comments:
Man, I’ve got certain information. Certain things have come to light … and … you know … has it ever occurred to you … that … instead of running around ... uh … uh … blaming me … given the nature of all this new shit … this could be a lot more … uh … uh … complex … it might not just be such a simple … uh … you know?
Those rich fucks! This whole fucking thing...
Whoda thunkit? The good cop and the bad cop are both cops.
I can't wait to see all the liberals forget what Obama's like now the instant they have a Republican congress to blame for it.
I agree with your point, but for the sake of argument I'll stipulate that what Tomasky is saying is basically accurate. OK, in my view some investigations, possible impeachments, disclosures and oversight would be good things. I mean, isn't the failure of Democrats to do this post 2006 and 2008 what has some of the more honest liberals upset with Democrats about?
Justin, think about what Tomasky says:
These will have little or no meaningful basis in fact but will attempt to distract the administration from its policy objectives,....
How would that be a distraction? Like maybe causing St Barry O'Barmy to have to define the word "is" under threat of impeachment? And that would harm us how, exactly? Isn't Tomasky saying St Barry is the real source of wisdom & power, and therefore denying that St Barry is just a puppet?
I guess this is why uncomfortable comedy is booming in America now. The truth about America is uncomfortable and everyone wants to learn how to laugh at that. Just like Russians did.
I can't think of a more accurate and concise euphemism than "alleged electoral irregularities" for nightstick-wielding, racial invective-hurling, poll-station thuggery. Tomasky has a bright future with either political party.
What exactly are the Democrats''policy objectives'? They've officially given up on immigration, climate change, unions... Pretty much all that's left is the deficit commission, and if the Republicans keep them too busy to deal with that, god bless em.
Brandt, give him the envelope.
Shut up, Judge!
What, have you given up posting anything with the title in English? All furrin'-titled posts? How come you hate Uhmurrica so bad, anyway?
the republicans are much worse! they straight out admit they're going to crash the plane into the mountain. whereas the democrats coddle and coo and assure people that nothing is fucked here.
My only quip is that roles are reversed on the welfare side of the warfare-welfare state, ensuring perfect symmetry.
Capt'n Obvious
I have just recently discovered this site and cannot tell you how much I enjoy it. This post is so unbearably on the money. Thank you.
Post a Comment