It won't go far enough to ban hateful rhetoric. We must ban rhetoric altogher. We must unite in a concerted effort to eradicate the expression of thoughts, opinions, and sentiments in language. We must embrace an unmediated primitivism through which our animal consciousness can once again reassert its preverbal, non-apprehending interaction with the natural world, the very structure of thought freed from the tyranny of verbalism. We must overthrow symbolic thought and reason, experienceing that-which-is solely as its is-in-itselfness. Only through the extirpation of the perversion of narrative self-consciousness can we triumph over hate, achieving a beatific, edenic transcendence whereby we are free to pass into pre-post-human supramorality, to lead us through to a heaven, starless and fatherless, a dark water.
Monday, January 10, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
33 comments:
Finally, someone more radical than Zerzan.
So in other words, check your KAnt at the door...
...! %@-Dollars!
You're unscannable, and yer shit's all fucked up, and ya talk like a fag! Go 'way! 'Batin'!!!
Ug ug uug
Slippery slope, Ioz. Wouldn't be long before is-in-itselfness got nonverbally fingered for the decimation of some comet strike or solar flare or slipping on some unshoveled shard of Eden and we'd have to ban post-narrative unmediated existence and THEN where'd we be, huh?
You fucking anarchists. You always focus on the abd things that rhetoric entails but you never pay attention to the millions of wonders it careful crafted arguments bring to our lives.
I mean, if you like a lack of written words so much, why don't you move to prehistoric Somalia?
Haha, you sound like that guy they're all talking about that Loughner liked who says the government is controlling us through grammar. IRONIC.
Yes yes yes !
And I have the perfect example of a rhetoric-free statement:
"Steal this bumpersticker."
The Empire never ended.
who is sugesting "banning rehtoric" of any kind? this post is strawman tantrum. maybe we should just legalize murder, so that the KKK have exactly the same rights and powers as the state.
@Jim Wetzel
your not a "reactionary utopian" your just a petitbourgeouise dickhead that thinks fort wayne is a great place to "nestle"
4:10 is well on the way to realizing the proposition of this post. And people accuse my philosophy of lacking tangible policies!
@4:29
I get the point of the post. I agree with the point of the post, all speech must be protected. How does that proposition negate the proposition that "speech" is not without consequence. The untopian libertarian i called dickhead might want to fight it out with a left Communist mow. That is my proposition, which proves BTW that speech 1. may be directed with the intent to incite an action(whether or not it acheives that purpose) and 2. Speech does not exist independently of the rest of the universe.
And pull the trigger until it goes click.
"What is government if words have no meaning?" — the question Jared Loughner asked Gabrielle Giffords at a "Congress in Your Corner" event in 2007. He was dissatisfied with her response, or lack of it, and events went forward from there.
This reminds me of the Zen exchange (described as an autobiographical event in Jacob Needleman's book What is God?:
Student: What is the self?
Teacher: Who's asking the question?
May the Creative Forces of the Universe have mercy on our souls, if any.
@IOZ @ 4:41
thats the idea, yeah.
@IOZ @ 4:41
thats the idea, yeah.
obviously, you're not a golfer
Do you really fail to grasp the distinction between laws and norms?
ooooohh, do tell....
The Norms were my favorite thing about Babylon 5.
If you kill all the golfers, who's going to play golf?
Whenever I lay my hands on laws and norms I can't get the distinction off of me for weeks.
I, for one, welcome Herrn Monsier's new plan. Where can I leave my thumbprints?
I hereby swear not to shoot you should you run for, or somehow attain, elected office, IOZ.
This promise may be hard to keep as I don't know your actual name. Please do give me a sign via mass media coded message. I'm waiting. Patiently. For now.
Can you come over to my house and show me how to use this surrender into a wordless dimension of our sensorial and omni-participatory presencing mode of reciprocity the as a transrational eigentlichkeit thing?
I'm all in!
IOZ getting all Heidegerrian and Derridean on our asses! No kidding! Check out the Heidegger of Poetry, Language and Thought. And Derrida's whole thing about "philosophy before philosophy" and before the word!
Fuck Keith Olberman!
when a man kills within the scope of the law.... WELL OKIE DOKIE... but talkin bout killin in the scope of the norms? HOW DARE YA???
"If you kill all the golfers, who's going to play golf?"
The caddies!
All of Chomsky's work for naught.
Wasn't that the plot in Snowcrash?
Post a Comment