Men may seem detestable as joint stock-companies and nations; knaves, fools, and murderers there may be; men may have mean and meagre faces; but man, in the ideal, is so noble and so sparkling, such a grand and glowing creature, that over any ignominious blemish in him all his fellows should run to throw their costliest robes. That immaculate manliness we feel within ourselves, so far within us, that it remains intact though all the outer character seem gone; bleeds with keenest anguish at the undraped spectacle of a valor-ruined man. Nor can piety itself, at such a shameful sight, completely stifle her upbraidings against the permitting stars. But this august dignity I treat of, is not the dignity of kings and robes, but that abounding dignity which has no robed investiture. Thou shalt see it shining in the arm that wields a pick or drives a spike; that democratic dignity which, on all hands, radiates without end from God; Himself! The great God absolute! The centre and circumference of all democracy! His omnipresence, our divine equality!Someone remembered that Melville had kind words for Cervantes, and here they are among some marvelous anarchism.
If, then, to meanest mariners, and renegades and castaways, I shall hereafter ascribe high qualities, though dark; weave round them tragic graces; if even the most mournful, perchance the most abased, among them all, shall at times lift himself to the exalted mounts; if I shall touch that workman's arm with some ethereal light; if I shall spread a rainbow over his disastrous set of sun; then against all mortal critics bear me out in it, thou just spirit of equality, which hast spread one royal mantle of humanity over all my kind! Bear me out in it, thou great democratic God! who didst not refuse to the swart convict, Bunyan, the pale, poetic pearl; Thou who didst clothe with doubly hammered leaves of finest gold, the stumped and paupered arm of old Cervantes; Thou who didst pick up Andrew Jackson from the pebbles; who didst hurl him upon a war- horse; who didst thunder him higher than a throne! Thou who, in all Thy mighty, earthly marchings, ever cullest Thy selectest champions from the kingly commons; bear me out in it, O God!
-from "Knights and Squires", Moby Dick
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
More Dick
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
if you would like create a virtual illustrated copy (by which i suppose i mean, 'have this blog open in your browser while you are reading'): http://everypageofmobydick.blogspot.com/
Speaking of New England literature (to be distinguished from new English literature), over the weekend spouse and self watched the three-decade old four-episode adaptation for public tv of Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter. It was good.
Of course, Anthony Lane's review of the later big-screen adaptation of The Scarlet Letter begins with one of the classic sentences of the genre: What is the point of Demi Moore?
Wim Wenders, of all people did a version of the Scarlet Letter in the early '70's. Lacking a review with such pith, it has faded from memory but I recall that it was good. Not as good as Melville, nor as inventive, but still good.
I can see why you admire Melville so much: he's even more excessively verbose than you are. No malice intended towards you or Melville ...
Z
C.L.R. James's comparison of Melville and Whitman ends up championing Melville for these kinds of democratic enthusiasms, finding him more comprehending of the vastness of humanity than old Walt, who got lost in the vastness but never quite focused in on the scuffy humanity. Worth a read.
that was me! i remembered that. dance internets, dance!
There's so much wonderful stuff in that book, but I think my favorite bit is the Sermon To The Sharks:
http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/sharkfeast.html
I think this calls for a Britishism: what utter bollocks. Man is a fancy hairless ape, and there is no God. And Andrew Jackson certainly has nothing to do with anarchism.
Andrew Jackson, slave owner. QED.
Yeah, Yeah, Jefferson too. You happy now?
Andrew Jackson certainly has nothing to do with anarchism.
A good many of his contemporaries would have said otherwise.
Like Duff-Man, contemporaries say a lot of things.
Speaking of Melville, Whitman, democratic enthusiasms, anarchism, Andrew Jackson, and sharks, our friends at the International Society for Individual Liberty have posted the following:
The following is an interesting letter from Ludwig von Mises to Ayn Rand dated January 23, 1956 (shortly after the publication of Atlas Shrugged).
Dear Mrs. Rand:
I am not a professional critic and I feel no call to judge the merits of a novel. So I do not want to detain you with the information that I enjoyed very much reading Atlas Shrugged and that I am full of admiration for your masterful construction of the plot.
But Atlas Shrugged is not merely a novel. It is also (or may I say: first of all) a cogent analysis of the evils that plague our society, a substantiated rejection of the ideology of our self-styled "intellectuals" and a pitiless unmasking of the insincerity of the policies adopted by governments and political parties. It is a devastating exposure of the "moral cannibals," the "gigolos of science" and of the "academic prattle" of the makers of the "anti-industrial revolution." You have the courage to tell the masses what no politician told them: you are inferior and all the improvements in your conditions which you simply take for granted you owe to the efforts of men who are better than you.
If this be arrogance, as some of your critics observed, it still is the truth that had to be said in this age of the Welfare State.
I warmly congratulate you and I looking forward with great expectations to your future work.
Kouchi Touyama might have enough courage, but I don't think he was around in Mises' time.
I believe that perhaps the phrase "excessively verbose" might itself be excessively verbose.
Post a Comment