Oh, I don't know, Prof. I think you perversely have to admire Friedman for his titanic certitude that all events, I mean, literally, every single thing that transpires on this earth, in this universe, confirms the thesis of his most recent book. Spontaneous mass uprising? Poorly received Superbowl commercial? Cosmic background radiation? They all verify that the world is flat. The flat world is like his Higgs boson: never actually observed, probably more metaphoric than actual, a sort of clever abstraction that, we swears, is actually responsible for everything being the way that it is. One of the glories of the Friedmanian worldview is that unlike that hoary old Conservativismism, you know, about standing astride history and yelling STOP, it stands astride reality in order that reality may pass ceaselessly and without obstruction between its chubby legs.
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Man, forget Friedman, check Yggles:
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/02/the-inescapability-of-judgment/
Short version: Michael Pollan is wrong to suggest that people should eat real food because olive oil is not a food, qed.
I think... yes, I think this is the stupidest thing I've ever read.
'This uprising feels post-ideological.
'The Tahrir Square uprising “has nothing to do with left or right,” said Dina Shehata, a researcher at Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies. “It is about young people rebelling against a regime that has stifled all channels for their upward mobility. They want to shape their own destiny, and they want social justice” from a system in which a few people have gotten fantastically rich, in giant villas, and everyone else has stagnated. Any ideological group that tries to hijack these young people today will lose.'
Social justice has nothing to do with ideology. Shaping your own destiny has nothing to do with ideology.
I'm going to go hit my head on a wall.
Cuneyt, don't forget your Anhedrin.
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/4208873/the_kentucky_fried_movie_movie_trailer/
My forehead's been bloody for years!
"Egyptians are not asking for Palestine or for Allah."
He speaks Arabic, so he knows obviously
We SWEARS to serve the mahstah of 'the world is flat', we swears it. We will swear on... on... ON THE WORLD!
Social justice has nothing to do with ideology. Shaping your own destiny has nothing to do with ideology.
Perhaps she means that the participants do not all share a common political label that they can readily name.
Interesting how in America, the idea that we live in "a system in which a few people have gotten fantastically rich, in giant villas, and everyone else has stagnated" is obviously ideologically based: It's rabidly liberal, if not outright communist.
Meanwhile, in Egypt, the exact same idea is comfortingly non-ideological, which in this case seems to mean something like "not overtly religious or concerned with foreign countries" which in turn seems to mean "Not at odds with US interests" which itself actually means "Not likely to offend the sensibilities of American conservatives"
So, really, the whole column is basically Friedman saying, "No, really, I know that normally a mob of poor Africans is a bad, scary thing, but these guys are cool!"
I think I'm going to pound a nail into a wall with my head.
The flat world is like his Higgs boson: never actually observed, probably more metaphoric than actual, a sort of clever abstraction that, we swears, is actually responsible for everything being the way that it is.
Leave the advanced particle physics out of it, it makes you look clueless. The Higgs is not in any sense "metaphoric", it either really exists or it doesn't, and that is a matter subject to ongoing empirical investigation. We just haven't finished the necessary experiments - yet. At some point in the relatively near future, we will actually know whether it really exists or whether we need to throw the idea away and start again.
Friedman's 'flat earth' is 'sort of clever'???
That's news.
Post a Comment