Saturday, March 12, 2011

In Jerusalem

I am certain, however, that those responsible for the murder of millions of Germans will never be brought to justice.

-Adolph Eichmann, in the notes for his memoirs
American liberals, when making the case for George W. Bush's deficient character, used to point to one especially grotesque episode where he mocked a woman about to be executed and laughed at her plight. This was supposed to represent a sort of vicious insouciance and brazen cruelty. Even if he believed the woman deserved to die, the polite response would have been to lament the regrettable necessity of the act, the sometimes unkind exigencies of justice. That he instead derided her and laughed at her and treated the legal killing of a human being with frat-house humor was seen, rightly, as evidence of a major missing slice of humanity, a sort of exuberantly violent and inhuman automation where a soul ought to reside.

If his psycopathic committment to killing people hadn't already convinced you that Barack Obama shared this particular quality of being a vacant, blood-driven monster whose outward appearance as one of our own kind is no more than an act of ingeious fakery, then you may wish to consider his response to the torture of Bradley Manning, which he treats with the blithe indifference of a busy manager signing off on some subordinate's expense report. Yeah, he assured me everything was copasetic. It's all good.

Here is a fine opportunity to engage in a little free and painless magnanimity, to make vague noises about according decent treatment even to one's enemies, to blather a bit about America's committment to the humane treatment of all God's precious children, to give the poor kid some boxer shorts and a couple of books to read, and to throw that paltry bone to his supporters in the Democratic faction, who would immediately beatify him as better-than-Cheney, and he passed on it. He said, no, we're going to go right on torturing this person, who has not been convicted of any crime, lest he commit suicide before we are able to consign him for the rest of his life to the tortures we are already visiting upon him. Here, then, is a man who considers torturing a kid barely past his youth for an alleged crime whose principal result to-date has been an acute case of The Embarrassments, more important, more pressing, and more necessary than the public maintenance of his own image as a moderate reformer and as a conciliator. I find that interesting indeed.

What this episode reveals is that the most salient aspect of Barack Obama's character is that he is an asshole of the worst order. He does not delight in cruelty like his predecessor, but is grossly indifferent to it. The Ts have all been crossed. Proper procedures followed? Yes. Fine. Let's move on. I have been assured.

43 comments:

Montag said...

yeah, the wikileaks thing is interesting not for what was recorded in secret correspondence, but for what our rulers expose about themselves in their reaction to its exposure. unsurprising though that may be.

The Mathmos said...

Not to say that Obama isn't being a complete psychopath about this and other things, but he's actually completely in character : doing nothing, rocking no institutional embarcations whatsoever.

I'm trying to imagine what he would look like taking up a mild defense of a powerless figure like Manning, but all I see is Warren Beatty having suicidal fits of hip-hop-culture in Bullworth.

Anonymous said...

Right on the money. While Gadaffy is being kind enough to provide Americans with someone to hate everyone has forgotten that Obama makes Gadaffy look like a gad fly when it comes to destruction and murder of innocents. It seems what they want is to make an example of Manning, rather like the way the Mafia operates. But then the government has always just been the biggest gang on the block.

Ethan said...

One of the very best things I've read on the subject.

drip said...

“I can’t go into details about some of their concerns,” [Obama} added, “but some of this has to do with Private Manning’s safety as well.” Like, there is some secret shit, see, stuff that if you knew about it would make you know that we are doing everything we can to keep him alive. But if I told you about it, it might make him less safe and you less safe and well, he gave away secrets about how we keep shit secret and that made us. . . well, you understand.

You were mean to Jeffrey Dahmer when you called Obama a monster.

Anonymous said...

The question of whether Obama's character is decisively dissimilar to Bush's when it comes to respect (reverence?) for the horrifying was answered, for me, at the Press Club Dinner when he made the joke about sending Predator Drones after young men who want to date his daughters.

Anonymous said...

Or think of the Collateral Murder video -- the video that shows sadists killing unarmed civilians from an attack helicopter and laughing about it. If Manning indeed leaked the video, his action is a perfect example of a whistleblower choosing to follow a higher moral authority -- at least higher than the DoD's chain of command could offer.

They are torturing the person who risked everything to tell the truth about injustice. He should be regarded as a hero for it.

Soj said...

Comparing the "yes we can close down Gitmo" candidate Obama to "ho hum procedures being followed" Obama might make a weaker mind wonder whether there's two different actual people involved.

Anonymous said...

This is exactly right.

Obama is the sickening embodiment of evil at its most banal.

Anonymous said...

Comparing the "yes we can close down Gitmo" candidate Obama to "ho hum procedures being followed" Obama might make a weaker mind wonder whether there's two different actual people involved.

Much weaker minds, though I have to admit Obama is more vicious than I'd anticipated, in that he's more vicious than the POTUS job even requires.

Leonard said...

At least Bush, immediately upon expressing his derision at Tucker, realized it was a false step and attempted to walk it back.

But of course, the two cases are different. Obama has been assured by all the experts that they're tormenting Manning his own good. He believes the experts. Who is he to judge or insert his own opinion? [T]hose who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

Karen said...

I knew who Obama was when he called a woman reporter "Sweetie" and when called upon it defended himself by saying he often calls women Sweetie.

Anonymous said...

Must feminists talk such shit all the time? It was a serious movement once.

Calling a woman sweetie and torturing a dude are on entirely different moral planets.

Anonymous said...

The American emperor must check his humanity at the portico before taking the position. In O's case, he's proving day by day that he had little to check, anyway.

Anonymous said...

Best writing on this topic I've seen yet.

Anonymous said...

Jeez, Obama just sacked State Dept flak Crowley for fairly tepid denunciation of Manning's treatment. He is really fucking hell-bent.

Mike J. said...

Well, how exactly do you know he doesn't delight in it? Surely you remember the "two words: predator drones" joke during the White House correspondents' dinner. He absolutely delights in crushing lesser beings between his fingers.

K. Ron Silkwood said...

"Here is a fine opportunity to engage in a little free and painless magnanimity"

Yes, the asshole passed on that - must not look weak in the Warren Terra.

The Mathmos said...

I just read about the 'resignation' of Crowley (@1:15 PM). This is beyond political calculus. What's happened to Manning and Crowley surely is to be interpreted by every government employees to never, ever break ranks on Security State matters.

PowerPoint presentations about Wikileaks, Al Jazeera and distributed online networks of shirtless anonymous teensters must have reached a critical mass inside the mind of our betters in the last few months, or something.

pauly said...

I must rant for a moment. The left blogosphere commentariat is an unbelievably masculine crowd, with lots of chest thumping posts about how such and such atrocity isn't surprising (look how tough and cynical I am!), and lots of pissing contests over who can say the meanest things about the capitalists/power elite/etc. Here, someone brings up a perfectly reasonable point about Obama being a sexist scumbag, and she's immediately shat upon and told her concerns aren't serious. For fuck's sake boys, have some self-consciousness about your gender. I don't read left blogs to get the kind of culture I could just as easily get from sportscenter.

Anonymous said...

Here, someone brings up a perfectly reasonable point about Obama being a sexist scumbag, and she's immediately shat upon and told her concerns aren't serious. For fuck's sake boys

Of course a lecture from a preeningly correct boy was inevitable, but you should lose the plural. One person shat on Karen - me - because she said a fucking stupid thing that is sadly indicative of how particularly idiotic feminism is getting lately, largely as a result of discursive traditions that are uniquely its own: the privileging of subjectivity not least.

I can't speak for the other 'boys' you lectured but for me, any woman is welcome who doesn't talk shit. Drawing a line between Obama saying 'sweetie' and the foul treatment of Bradley Manning is stupid nonsense regardless of who says it and as its allegedly feminist, it's fair to point it out as such.

Now go lecture some other 'boys'. Hark, I hear someone being cynical about Julian Assange's rape accusers. Go get him.

Anonymous said...

By the way, Pauly, everyone shits on everyone else here when they say something dumb and Karen probably doesn't need a boy to make it all all right for her. If she does, she's not a feminist.

pauly said...

I love a barrage of priapic missives as much as the next fella, but I've no interest in a flame war. Allow me to simply say that my frustration has little to do with whatever hurt feelings you seem to think I see myself remedying. I'm far more concerned with seeing a left internet culture that's slightly less cocktacular.

John said...

Don't go picking a fight with Anonymous now. Anonymous won't take shit from nobody. Plus, Anonymous really cares about the level of our discourse. We should all agree that Anonymous has a point to make, and that Anonymous doesn't really have to care about what you think. Lord knows, Anonymous has earned it.

t.m. said...

Unlike pauly I can't speak for all of us women, but I also thought Karen's comment was rather jarring in context. To be fair, maybe she meant that it was the moment she realized Obama's general assholitude, not that the act was equivalent to torture.

Anonymous said...

Uh, Karen's point was that Obama's justification for calling a woman not part of his family sweetie was completely oblivious to what might be problematic with that: hey, what's wrong, its just SOP for me.
It's not so much the sexism, though there's that, but his indifference.

Anonymous said...

IOZ is not the place to come for productive discussion and Pauly is ruining the fun by being such a whiny weiner. His Victimanity is the national religion (and IOZ's too so far as I've been able to make out) and thus represents the local orthodoxy. Which is pretty goddamn dull.

I'm happy that Pauly is trying to ""create, foster and organize a leftist internet culture that respects women and is sensitive to their concerns"" but he'd best do it elsewhere where people have more patience, less cynicism and are more staid, dull, trite and - overall - worthless. IOZ aint the place for it. We're here to read and write cleverly phrased hyperbolic cynical statements of snark (with generous gobs of irony if at all possible) and we're happy to shit in Karen's mouth for her cardboard sentences if nothing more. YOU however we'd like to skewer for a little while longer, so please stick around.

Anonymous said...

You go, Nony!

Charles F. Oxtrot said...

that would be Nony-the-Toreador, I think.

Anonymous said...

By all means, don't underestimate The Great Pretender of Hopey-Changey-Moovsie-Forwardsie Land and his ability to play the dozens like fiddles in a GEICO commercial.

His predecessors Bush and Cheney were inspired by Vic Mackey and his Strike Team of sociopaths over the course of 88 episodes of "The Shield" moreso than Jack Bauer of "24" ...

On the same token, Obama is greatly inspired by Captain/Councilman David Aceveda of "The Shield" where the social and political benefits of enabling and rewarding Vic Mackey and his band of lunatics insured that his own corruption, incompetence, and malfeasance in the face of it all never saw sunlight on the newspapers, thus paving the road for him to climb the political ladder relatively unmolested.

So a correction may be in order: true to form of Aceveda's character, Obama's indifference to Dick "Vic Mackey" Cheney and George W. "Shane Vandrell" Bush (and all their victims) ceases where his political aspirations began. They both have that much of a fleeting conscience left, but they must hock and pawn the motherfucker under the "go along to get along" rubric in order to keep up appearances, preserve his own ass, and in turn the collective asses of the fence jockey DLC/Third Way status quo.

With any luck, it'll backfire and backfire badly to the point where the DLC/Third Way fools and hypocrites won't be able to sell their "move to the center/go along to get along" surrender monkey bullshit to the voters even if it were fertilizer. But I wouldn't count on it. The Obama administration has dodged enough political Chia Pets of Doom than his predecessors because of his predecessors ...

Anonymous said...

Obama's acting like he doesn't care, his joking, hypocrisy and disconnected demeanor tells me he's mentally
walked away from it all - thrown in the towel! Question is, is he beat by what's already happened or what he knows is going to come out in future WikiLeak cables. I suspect we ain't seen nothing yet!

Anonymous said...

At what point will Obama meet with Manning and give the "boot stamping on a human face" speech?

Kevin Burton Smith said...

Whoa.

Read the story at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/12/us/12manning.html

They're withholding jammies from Manning, not waterboarding him. And calling someone "sweetie" is not the same as raping them. While I think Obama's definitely in the wrong here, you people need to get a grip. Your very valid arguments and concerns lose moral and intellectual traction when you so easily slip into such excessive, Tea Party-like hyperbole.

I'm surprised nobody here has called Obama a Nazi yet.

Anonymous said...

To Kevin Burton Smith

"in the wrong"?

Ya. So was Dr.Mengele.

Go back to Huffington Post, little boy.

Anonymous said...

Wow, Obama "actually asked" if the pentagon was torturing other prisoners - and they were, so it's okay.

Dude, it's not the asking we were questioning, but your acceptance of the answer.

I voted for him. I may be forced by practicalities to do so again.

Angry. Sad. Disillusioned.

CayVoo said...

Oh, Obama is a Nazi! That's for you, Kevin Burton Smith.

Montag said...

he was threatening castration (by predator drone)! are you gonna split hairs?

Anonymous said...

the point was obama's character and calling a woman journalist sweetie says something about it, and not a good thing. that one can insult jeffrey dahmer by calling obama a monster doesn't make it any less true.

SleepDirt said...

Excellent post and many excellent responses.

Sleepdirt

Freedom from Tyranny said...

@Kevin Burton Smith.

In case you don't know, the treatment of Bradley Manning VIOLATES the very UCMJ that they are all using as reason to torture this kid (and if you don't think it's torture, you must be a Republican).

The UCMJ, in article 10, says that when someone is incarcerated the military has to bring him to trial quickly or release him...Article 13 says that punishment may not be inflicted until he is convicted of the allegations...and interestingly, the allegations could garner the death penalty for the young man (at least that's what the conservatives want), and their idiotic claim of why they are making him be naked is so that he won't commit suicide????WTF.

Anyone else see the irony here? "You can't quit, we're going to fire you..." This is the fucking bunch of morons running the military...no wonder we can't win any wars...

bring the troops home - all of them from everywhere. It's bullshit.

Anonymous said...

But... did the Patriot Act not abolish the constitution? Yepp, that's right, it did. So what are you guys whining about? These laws were made by our ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES for our SAFETY from the ubiquitous and endless Terrorist Threat (TM)...

Otherwise, the Terrorists (TM) will kill you in your sleep at night. Never ever forget that!

Bastiat's Ghost said...

If you think what is happening to Bradley Manning is some sort of novel atrocity, then I have one simple question for you:

Who is Dianna Ortiz?

David in NYC said...

All you Anonymouses (Anonymice?) need to figure out some way to distinguish yourselves, so the appropriate one can be flamed appropriately. Those of you who like flame wars, go over to RumpRoast and say that Barry O is something less than a saint, and just watch what happens. Be prepared for a lot of excrement-related insults; it seems to be all they can do.

Now, then: those of you who think Karen is somehow equating Obama's approval of the torture of Bradley Manning with his casual use of "Sweetie" are missing the point. It seemed to me a rather obvious observation about the content of his character, as evidenced by his pattern of behavior in addressing non-familial females (i.e., he is a casually condescending sexist; vide his comment to HRC about being "likable enough").

The telling moment for me was when President Hopey-Changey announced, less than three weeks after Election Day 2008, that his economic advisors would be the same Moe, Larry, and Curly (Summers, Bernanke, and Geithner, for those scoring at home) who drove the economy over the cliff in the first place. And, no, that is also NOT the same as authorizing the torture of PFC Manning.

@Kevin Burton Smith -- the details of how Manning's treatment violates the UCMJ have been adequately explained by Freedom from Tyranny. You may also be interested to know that "[t]he problem with the argument that Manning is being kept in long-term solitary confinement to prevent his suicide is that long-term solitary confinement causes suicide."

And I am with FfT: if you don't think what's happening to Bradley Manning is torture, you must be a Republican -- or a sociopath (but I repeat myself).

Anyway, fun thread and fun comments all around! Everyone have a great weekend, and hope that you won't be glowing in the dark by Monday morning.