Tuesday, March 01, 2011

The Menu

Seconded.

I have always felt that to properly understand the operative meaning of the description "humanitarian," you should compare it to the descriptive use of the word "vegetarian."

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Except vegetarians don't make other people eat their vegetables.

So weird to see people who should know better (anarchists even) joining up with the cruise missile left on this one.

What happens to people? It's a like a fever.

Anonymous said...

Also no vegetarian has ever proposed eating a vegetable to save a vegetable.

Freddy el Desfibradddor said...

PeeWee's Playhouse (Saturday morning kids' tv show starring Paul Rubens)

"If you love that fruit salad so much, why don't you marry it?"

So he did.

Anonymous said...

But but vegetarians generally don't use animal welfare as a justification to murder omnivorous humans (although I'll grant you your ALFs that love them some property destruction).

Solar Hero said...

To Serve Man

demize! said...

Creamed spinach man, soy milk stylee!

LA Confidential Pantload said...

Well, speaking as a vegetative-American...oh, what? Sorry.

David Chappell said...

Looking forward to the Friday Foodie recipe for couch potatoes

Todd S. said...

Some touchy vegetarians here. Apparently some people missed the terms "objective meaning" and "descriptive use".

Anonymous said...

Actually, Todd, I think all but one person (nony at 1:39) got IOZ's meaning but you're really smart too.

Anonymous said...

Libertarian. Apply joke. Ha.

Anonymous said...

Your boy Crispin may need a reminder. Who's the anarchist here?!

Anonymous said...

5:05 --

Oh, I GET IT - - - - "humanitarians" eat "humans"! heheahahahah.

-- 1:39.

ts said...

humans go better with fava beans. and a nice chianti. fthfthfthfhthfth.

Anonymous said...

You ripped this off from the Twilight Zone.