Sunday, August 07, 2011

Cruel to be Kind

I happened to flip past the Tavis Smiley show today on the way to the store; he had the most incredible--I do not mean that as a compliment--panel of yahoos: Cornell West; Arianna Huffington, Frum, Milibank, John S. Chen.  Oh god, they started in on edumatcation.  Chen was like, Yo, back in Hong Kong, we study for 29 hours a day; our children do not sleep; failure is not tolerated.  The last bit is especially hilarious because he had said, literally moments before, that the reason American higher education is superior to all the rest of the world combined to the billionth power whereas its K-12 sux mah balls is that colleges fail students which incetivizes blah blah blah whereas in public edumacation social promotion rules the day.  Well I guess in Hong Kong failure is an option, just . . . an unexercised one.

A month or so ago, David Brooks said something astonishingly intelligent.  It was when everyone was still talking about the Tiger Balm mother or whatever, the one who's like, I psychologically torture my children in order to guarantee their superficial success in the credentialing sector.  Brooks said, in effect: that shit, it's easy.  Anyone can play the violin if they practice; anyone can learn calculus.  Try navigating the social currents at a tween sleepover and get back to me.  He said, look, anyone can learn shit.  Neuroscience tells us that the mind is almost infinitely plastic.  All the old developmental truisms about, like, learning a language when you're a wee bairn; that shit is basically completely unfounded and untrue, mere anecdote, completely at odds with the still-emerging portrait of the brain as it really, remarkably is.  So, you know, snuffing out your child's spiritual development in order that they get through two years of algebra in eight months in order that Forbes magazine or whoever can say that America has better eighth graders than Sweden is effectively nuts; it creates automatons with no capacity to act cooperatively and creatively outside of a rigidly ordered hierarchy in which all decisions flow from an apex point . . .

Oh.  Oh, wait.  Oh, shit.

13 comments:

dictateursanguinaire said...

Re: Brooks

Even a broken watch...

Assuming you're exaggerating his position somewhat but even that basic premise...damn! Some "out of the box" thinking coming from the boho bobo

Peter Ward said...

Neuroscience tells us that the mind is almost infinitely plastic. All the old developmental truisms about, like, learning a language when you're a wee bairn; that shit is basically completely unfounded and untrue, mere anecdote, completely at odds with the still-emerging portrait of the brain as it really, remarkably is.

So at last neuroscience has caught up to empiricism and Skinnerian psychology?

Certainly it seems learning is "infinite" in as much as one has time to learn new things. But to extrapolate from that fact the mind/brain having "infinite plasticity" seems dubious. Not only prima facie, as the body generally is not "infinitely plastic", though certain organs, hands, e.g., can be put to infinite use; but scientifically--the theory of generative grammar or long term sensory impairment do to infant sensory deprivation are examples casting doubt on the empiricist hypothesis, showing what do appear to be unassailable limits. And finally, one should reflect, so little is understood about how the mind/brain works and there are so many prejudicial impediments to understanding I think it wisest to treat any findings in neuroscience or psychology at this stage as probably being very wide the mark, at best--in fact, even the way the questions are presently being asked ought to be suspect.

Frederick said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Cüneyt said...

Well, I'm no psychologist, but in my mental health experience, it's more often that someone tells themselves they're an old dog than that they actually can't learn any new tricks. But I dig narrative theory, so big fucking surprise I find what I seek.

IOZ said...

Fair enough, Peter, especially the last bit.

prick baxter said...

"...it creates automatons with no capacity to act cooperatively and creatively outside of a rigidly ordered hierarchy in which all decisions flow from an apex point..."

prick baxter said...

meant to post a link with that quote

For a Standout College Essay, Applicants Fill Their Summers

Paul Alexander said...

We may not know a lot about how the mind works, but the assumption implicit in this post sure seems much more pleasing than most of the alternatives.

Anonymous said...

I came to this site because of a very good article pf yours quoted on another site.

Now you come out with stuff like 'special language learning ability in the young is a myth.'

Not only is scientific evidence for these abilities abundant; simple observation can prove it to you.

Clearly, you don't educate yourself, nor do you observe what is right outside you. You're just another fanatic narcissist who firmly believes whatever seems right to you.

It's getting harder and harder to find anything resembling the truth these days. More bad information I do not need. Goodbye.

PS: Go ahead and delete, you coward.

Karl Franz Ochstradt said...

It's getting harder and harder to find anything resembling the truth these days.

signed,

I. Ronny Nonny

Paul said...

This post is motherfucking GOLD.

ergo said...

Ronny Nonny, were you listening to the Dude's story?

LuckyLaud said...

"simple observation can prove it to you."

Brilliant !