I mean, on the one hand, there's a lot of good stuff here, especially regarding the use of psychopharmacology as mind control. On the other hand:
Yet despite their lack of confidence in the availability of Social Security for them, few have demanded it be shored up by more fairly payroll-taxing the wealthy; most appear resigned to having more money deducted from their paychecks for Social Security, even though they don’t believe it will be around to benefit them.That's the example? You see, this is where non-institutional leftism runs aground; yes, it rejects the fakery of Democratic party politics; it does not fall for Barack Obama's phony hoperation compain; and yet the ne plus ultra of its egalitarian vision is a little more democratic socialism for the yutes; it demands nothing but institutional access: gaymarriage, socialsecurity, healthinsurance. Its prescription for the future is stirringly . . . bourgeois. Middle-class entitlements . . . or bust! If you can't mobilize a twenty-something with the halcyon cry of unsecured payroll tax deductions, what can you mobilize him with? WHAT'S IT GONNA TAKE WITH YOU PEOPLE?