"Police departments should not be using weapons built for the military on civilian protesters," said Witold Walczak, legal director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania "As this case shows, the LRAD cannot be controlled to prevent serious harm to innocent bystanders. Collateral harm to innocents may be justifiable in wartime, but not to quell protesters who overturned a couple of trash dumpsters."Reason number one gazillion and one whyIamnotalibertarian: the conviction that you can keep the cops out of the army's arsenal. Oy ya yoy. The relentless division of the world into gaggles of citizen-subjects and the idea that Brutalizing Their Own People is a category that permits you, whomever you are, to go in there and brutalize them instead and for their own good are theneat corollaries. Remember the old NRA adage: guns don't kill people, people kill people? It's true! But it too has an attendant truth, which is that weapons do not cease to be effective when pointed at the wrong people. If you concede that sound weapons may exist, may be permitted to exist, then sorry, but you must also accept and understand that they may one day be used against you, just as satellites and drones peer through your curtains as readily as they peer through the curtains of Kabul, just as the Total Information Awareness machine minds read your blog as happily as Vladimir Putin's tumblr. The agents of state power cannot be prevented from availing themselves of the tools of state power through any application of the clever little fictions called laws. The law itself is an instrument of state power as surely as guns and nuclear bombs. You will often hear civil libertarian types say that the police should not act like soldiers. Why not? They are.
-ACLU report quoted by James Wolcott
Friday, November 18, 2011
Tinker Tailor Soldier Cop
Labels:
Anarchy,
Global Gulag,
Libertarianism,
Occupy,
Police State,
Protest
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
37 comments:
Peace legions of the homeland.
Uh, Monsieur, have you never heard of Pussy Comatosis? DUH!
If there were no laws, how would the State be able to protect us middle classians by locking up the indigent who can't afford legal representation? Wait, I can't afford legal representation either! I don't mind drones peeping through the curtains, I love being watched. Ooh la la!
Why, M'sieur, are you so focussed on power relationships?
There are, you know, other dimensions known to social psychologists (or, as you once called them, "advertising men") ...
Any sentence that incorporates a variation on the word know and a variation on the word psychologist is inherently false in the absence of a correcting negative.
Ha yes, it's totally justifiable to kill innocent civilians so long as they're not overturning dumpsters.
http://vladputins.tumblr.com/
While I have a few theories as to why, I still find that weirdest of human tendencies which is to bestow power on other humans and then expect them to do good things with it is just bizarre. Give anybody any kind of power from minor to major and the very first thing they will do is abuse it. Of course we are all damaged goods so maybe that explains it.
Genes don't come in neat packages, rob - so even gays who have apparently not inherited reproductive urges may well have inherited power urge genes which trace back to the earliest vertebrates locking "horns" to prove who is most worthy of female attention and propagation of the species ... the whole damn race has inherited them damn power urge genese ...
genes? seriously? i think you're reading late-capital modes of production back into evolutionary history
nonny@1:41 - hey - they didn't call'im Gene Jacques Rousseau for nuttin, ya know ...
haha. good one.
If some asshole wants to take it upon himself to clean the office fridge, I'm not one to say no. If that person then posts "Fridge Rules" and gets the boss to write sternly worded memos when they are broken, I'm too lazy to do anything other than make sure I've put my initials on my containers and not left anything in the fridge for longer than a week. Who wants to deal with HR?
Diarrhea runs in your jeans?
keep dodging accountability for the embarrassment of your tebow-hatred, EYEAHZ, but some of us ain't fooled
Speaking of police and civilian protestors, a Methodist minister who was pepper-sprayed in Seattle has gotten all preachy about it:
http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2011/11/17/rev-lang-on-getting-pepper-sprayed-by-cops
@Anony @2:25
Yeah Monsieur, how about kissin some tebow ass?!
Also, no one said sheeit when the blecks and messicans were gettin militarized police up their butts.
If that person then posts "Fridge Rules" and gets the boss to write sternly worded memos when they are broken,
Yes, that is exactly what I mean. I'm glad I don't work any longer, the memories...ugh.
"even gays who have apparently not inherited reproductive urges may well have inherited power urge genes which trace back to the earliest vertebrates locking "horns" to prove who is most worthy of female attention and propagation of the species"
Women seem curiously absent from this origin story, 'cept as shit you obtain, like baubles. Also, women don't participate in reproduction, they just get fucked. Always love to hear apologia for bad'n'violent shit stinking of this particular strain of evolutionary psychology, wherein cave men did it so why can't we? You have a pretty piss-poor view of cavefolk, guy.
They're gonna kill That Poor Woman. They're gonna KILL THAT POOR WOMAN.
anon@2:52 -
It is what it is.
Your comment reminds me of Stalin's Lysenko-ists and Marr-ists - desperate to prove that Lamarck was correct cause if he wasn't then there wasn't gonna be any "new Soviet man" anytime soon ...
I'm too lazy to do anything other than make sure I've put my initials on my containers
If you write those initials really large, you can call it a constitution. That's sure to keep the buggers from messing with your shit.
EL - they didn't make a new Soviet man, but they were able to genetically engineer (the old-fashioned way - selective breeding) a new tame fox
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_silver_fox
Yes, because disparaging just-so stories is the same as yearning for the ubermensch. Idiot.
Attributing the cause of male foibles throughout history on capricious loins is another way of saying it's all the ladies fault and men are simply led around by their own rape-y tendencies. Again, you dudes must really hate other dudes; also, stop trying to implicate queer dudes in your own personal failings, thanks; also, crack open a book once in a great while, and see your beautiful macho fantasies of yore dissolve, crumble, and quake.
Dire Straights.
And state power in turn is an instrument of...?
you dudes must really hate other dudes
True story.
You think they read Putins tumblr? Maybe, but i have a hunch the Russians are still not that easy for the US to spy on, at least not compared to rest of the world. I love the Russians surly
"up-yours, president asshole" national character. I was afraid that would collapse with the Berlin wall but thankfully it hasnt.
...the class with control of the wealth and the means of production, Mr. Smith.
yup, yup, the most relevant book to our (super)contemporary era prolly came out in 1907. Conrad's The Secret Agent, i mean: "Don't you know what the police are for, Stevie? They are there so that them as have nothing shouldn't take anything away from them who have." but, really, it's all there: a sober analysis of terrorism, Science as Fetish, and the timeless dance of Cop and Copped ..
Conrad's The Secret Agent has the darkest ending in all of English literature, except maybe for King Lear.
plahshch ... you're forgetting Greene's Brighton Rock, I think ...
I have some rights of memory in this kingdom,
Which now to claim my vantage doth invite me.
Capt'n Obvious
Anonymous 1:59...
From: Shannon
Date: Monday 17 August 2009 10.12am
To: Staff
Subject: Coffee cups
Hi
There was twelve coffee cups left in the sink this morning. Could everyone please wash their coffee cups after using them.
Thanks, Shan
From: David Thorne
Date: Monday 17 August 2009 10.19am
To: Shannon
Subject: Re: Coffee cups
Morning Shannon,
My apologies. Those coffee cups were mine. I am rather busy today so decided to have all of my coffee breaks at the one time this morning rather than taking twelve separate breaks throughout the day. I am currently experiencing severe heart palpitations but also typing at four hundred and seventy words per minute so should be able to knock off early.
Regards, David.
http://www.27bslash6.com/cups.html
Our Man in Havana, dudes.
Post a Comment