Tuesday, December 06, 2011

Demonocracy

Although there is a long history of bomb attacks on Shia Muslims in neighbouring Pakistan, there has never been such a large-scale attack in Afghanistan, raising fears that radical outside groups are being drawn into the already complex and fragmented Afghan insurgency.
-The Guardian
Well it is certainly fortunate that we liberated these poor people from the Taliban.

It is worth recalling, as we all wring our hands over the depredations of Wall Street and the inability of some twenty-five-year-old Americans to repay hastily accrued "student" debt, that the American empire is still in full-on bone-crusher mode.  These things can't readily be divorced, the one from the other; nevertheless, as a matter of emphasis, it's good to remember that there's extraction, and there's extraction; the machinery of profit exports its more sordid forms of violence just as it exports its most exploitative forms of labor; pepper spray is to the cluster bomb as the service sector is to the sweat shop.  This is another reason why when folks say that OWS and like minds are naive in their disengagement from electoral politics and their belief that their civilization is irrevocably broken and unrecoverable, I spit on the sidewalk.  OWS is insufficiently cynical.  America is quite willing and able to destroy whole societies, yet you believe it is somehow morally indefinsible to avoid the ballot box; you think it anti-democratic?  Democracy has delivered the greatest military juggernaut in the history of mankind.  You will of course say, oh, no, America is an ersatz empire; it can barely control a restive province or two full of primitives.  I say you've got the spyglass backwards.  We can smash whole countries in heedless, half-cocked campaigns barely funded by fraudulent national accountancy.  And your response to this monstrosity is to say that we ought organize within the existing channels?

43 comments:

Eerily Lackadaisical said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Justin said...

I can get you a toe.

Eerily Lackadaisical said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Eerily Lackadaisical said...

"pepper spray is to the cluster bomb as the service sector is to the sweat shop"

...S(pray)...cluS(ter)...S(ervice)...S(ector)...S(weat)

Wow! (And I bet ya didn't even work for it, ya fucker ...)

As Susan Kohner said to Sal Mineo:

"Play some more of that scary music, Gene ..."

Or in this case, that scary alliteration.

And speaking of sweat shops, Thomas Hood would be proud of you ...

http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/the-song-of-the-shirt/

And ya know, it's actually interesting that Song of the Shirt was written in 1843, when the Brits were flexin THEIR imperial muscle ...

... kinda goes to your point, I think ....

ChocoSpooge/CharredBread said...

Hey, I just want adequate zoning laws so I don't have to talk to my neighbors.

Montag said...

it's good to have someone clean and articulate to make the case for foreign policy. also we should cut ties with China cus of their human rights record.

Anonymous said...

Out of sight
Out of mind

Leonard said...

Democracy has delivered the greatest military juggernaut in the history of mankind.

Quite so:

Central to the understanding of the Levée is the idea that the new political rights given to the mass of the French people also created new obligations to the state. As the nation now understood itself as a community of all people, its defense also was assumed to become a responsibility of all. Thus, the Levée en masse was created and understood as a means to defend the nation for the nation by the nation.

Historically, the Levée en masse heralded the age of the people's war and displaced prior restricted forms of warfare as the cabinet wars (1715–1792) when armies of professional soldiers fought without general participation of the population.


Of course, we have over time steadily made the levee into just taxation, and the masse has dwindled to the proud few volunteers. The need is low. Nonetheless, democracy is still the cause of mass warfare.

President Gas said...

This is brilliant, true, well written -- but I think you also aren't going far enough.

The ruling elite in the US controls the global narrative -- which is not about the mass media or schools or churches or town halls. We can go back to 1920s social critics like Dewey and Lippmann to notice how long ago those institutions were locked down.

Controlling the global narrative means, for instance, weighing the merits of killing off 90% of the human population vs. gradually extinguishing critical consciousness from the human condition. The latter is regarded as the liberal position.

The wildly destructive, pointless, illegal wars in the Middle East seem to be about using desperation to accelerate a story of global crisis.

lucid said...

The wildly destructive, pointless, illegal wars in the Middle East seem to be about using desperation to accelerate a story of global crisis.

Of course the interesting thing here is that 'crisis' has historically been the rallying cry of the right - as crisis assumes a fallen nature - that something once good has become corrupted. Heidegger is famous for this - specifically the notion of kairos, i.e. the moment in a diseased patient where intervention is necessary to restore health, a moment which, once past will result in the patient's death.

I've found it very interesting over the last 30 years or so that purportedly left discourse has also adopted this stance, not only with respect to things like climate change, but more importantly with respect to 'America'. Somehow our democracy is in crisis - it has become corrupted by money and we need to get back to when it 'worked'. These protestations do nothing but further the goals of aristocracy.

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

You guys constructing theoretical global edifices got it all wrong.

Let me paraphrase:

"All paranoia and narcissim is local"

In other words, it all comes from a very few bad actors who ask themselves only one question:

"Who can potentially prevent me from getting more?"

This is the insight embodied in the old Almanac song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GG0gEcTXSJk

Frederick said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Frederick said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

"All paranoia [...] is local"

but what about if the they that are out to get me are located in another country/planet? our in folds hidden in space/time? or like those extra dimensions super-stringer's are always blathering about? or what if it's the super-stringers that are out to get me??????

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

anon@2:31 -

To paraphrase Sir Eddington

...it's even worse than we're capable of imagining ...

... think about entangled quarks ... they imply that the Javert to your Valjean might only have been in your "locale" a few billion years ago but nonetheless, is still pursuing you today, even though he's many light years away ...

Anonymous said...

shit man, you're escalating my paranoia for local to multidimensional/interglacial (i mean spacial?) or whatever the fuck.

but then i wonder, what if rather than objects existing in space/time, space/time is actually an emergent property of objects?

Anonymous said...

*from local to . . .

Eerily Lackadaisical said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Eerily Lackadaisical said...

nonny@252 -

... that would certainly explain entanglement at a distance ...

... I think ya oughta lick your pinky again and see if you can elaborate the hypothesis ...

Anonymous said...

lick my pinky???? are you hitting on me?

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

anon@3:01 ... huh? I was merely telling you to do another hit ... or isn't that an acceptable mode of ingestion these days? (I'm afraid it's been a while ...)

lucid said...

EL - for Molly I s'pose. Don't really see much liquid around these days.

Anonymous said...

well, i have mine hidden in one of those mini-mouth-drop bottles. it's pretty clean stuff. like, it fucks you up, but you always know why you're fucked up, if that makes sense.

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

3:15'er - perfect sense ... back in the day, there was all these kids thinkin they were trippin and all they were doin was speedin because the stuff was cut down with so much speed ...

Professor Coldheart said...

Controlling the global narrative means, for instance, weighing the merits of killing off 90% of the human population vs. gradually extinguishing critical consciousness from the human condition. The latter is regarded as the liberal position.

I lurrrve you, Mr. President.

Anonymous said...

No fucking way. We're simply in the next go around of the motherfucking centralized state. This garbage will end with a few Capitals Hbombed. My wet dream in this regard includes a Tzar bomba falling on tour eiffel.

Anonymous said...

Capt'n Obvious

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

"States" can be projections of ids or superegos or egos, and they will act accordingly.

What you're all, again, not getting, is that they're invariably the projections of the ids, superegos, or egos of a very small set of people.

And the projection does not turn these people's psyches into something abstract called "states".

It simply writes their psyches large.

Enron said...

there never was any money

puppylander said...

"We can smash whole countries in heedless, half-cocked campaigns barely funded by fraudulent national accountancy."

but i'm just one man. what can i do to stop them? ah. i know. i'll drive slowly in the fast lane!

The Mathmos said...

EL has it right for once. Trucidate a few rich fucks and I submit the world would be unrecognizable for it.

The "human greed" discourse underestimate the lack of historical precedent for the scale of the current ignominy. This shit ain't normal human behaviour, you judeo-christians you.

Anonymous said...

but i'm just one man. what can i do to stop them?

Withdrawing consent works for conscience immediately and for the improving the wrongs in the long run.

Capt'n Obvious

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

"EL has it right for once. Trucidate a few rich fucks and I submit the world would be unrecognizable for it."

I thought I was saying just the opposite, at least if you were to judiciously trucidate the right ones.

Or are you saying that if even if you trucidated these, there is an inexhaustible plethora of other greedy assholes waiting to have their ids projected on the world stage as "states"?

If so, then we're agreed.

The Mathmos said...

We’re not. Your theodicy according to which all humanity is interchangeably psychotic given the right means is only slightly less paranoid than the current leadership cadre.

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

"all humanity"

I said "a plethora" of humanity, not "all".

Anyway, I was merely hoisting a counterweight to the over-abstraction that goes on around here ... reminds me of the 70s', when academics seemed to forget that English has action verbs too ... someone seemed to have promulgated a rule that substantive:verb ratio in all papers must be 10:1 and that all substantives must be at least five syllables and end in an approved Latinate suffix... I once published a paper in generative grammar in which I deliberately chose a parody of this style to illustrate a point about nesting in nominalizations:

Rome's destruction of Carthage's disruption of Mediterranean trade-routes

which makes perfect sense when unstacked as

the disruption of Mediterranean trade-routes by Rome's destruction of Carthate

mistah charley, ph.d. said...

Our friends at Wikipedia say:

The philosopher W.W. Bartley juxtaposes without comment Niebuhr's [Serenity] prayer with a Mother Goose rhyme (1695) expressing a similar sentiment:

For every ailment under the sun
There is a remedy, or there is none;
If there be one, try to find it;
If there be none, never mind it.

mistah charley, ph.d. said...

Speaking of verbs, and latinate suffixes -

I had to look up trucidate

Anonymous said...

full spectrum dominance.

"Three's three dectives working on it down on the crime lab, we got em working in shifts."

TGGP said...

Afghanistan was already fairly destroyed. We're bombing rubble, which the military doesn't find quite so fun as bombing standing structures (hence, Iraq).

Anonymous said...

Well, now we're going to fucking Africa, so it's all full circle of life and shit.

Anonymous said...

oh waaaaaaaaaaaaaa...this is the whiniest, bitchiest, moralizingest, sanctimonious post yet.


if: "These things can't readily be divorced, the one from the other"
then"

then: "These things can't readily be divorced, the one from the other"

who the fuck are you, david brooks?

Anonymous said...

Actually, the scary thing is that America is not (yet) in "full-on bone-crusher mode". That is when the modern day MacArthurs in the military brass get their wish, to plaster China with dozens of strategic nukes, granted.

Anonymous said...

The international businessmen wouldn't like it, but it would sure bring a hell of a lot of jobs back to America. Per Orwell, nationalism may lie dormant, but in the end international solidarity (whether Christian, proletarian, or financial) always loses to it.