Saturday, January 14, 2012

Preach the Gospel always and, if necessary, use words

Now Washington D.C. has long been held to be quite literally Satanic by the conspiracy set, its streets a neat tracery of devilish runes, and while I give some credence to the belief, I hold Washington to be something even worse, which is in terrible taste; I can think of no uglier city; it makes St. Louis look like Paris; it makes Houston look like Angkor Wat.  And the MLK memorial is another perfect addition to the perfectly awful landscape, an immense, hammy, vaguely angry demigod emerging from a styrofoam Star Trek set piece, scowling in cartoonish dismay, looking, to my eyes, as if he is slightly hungry.  I am apparently late to the story, but it appears that the creators got the quotations wrong!  But no one can figure out how to transform the inaccurate paraphrase into a statement of actual principles without blowing the whole thing up.  Which describes how all right-thinking folk feel about Washington and thus, in an ironical sorta way, make me hope they leave the thing exactly as it is, a goofy reminder that the misattribution of bogus notions is the crowning intellectual endeavor in these United States.

36 comments:

Justin said...

I am pretty sure the woman with her arms upraised in a V was one of my college history professors.

mistah charley, ph.d. said...

In the same general neighborhood, last summer I visited the George Mason Memorial for the first time. I highly recommend it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Mason_Memorial

Happy Jack said...

I am pretty sure the woman with her arms upraised in a V was one of my college history professors.

Melissa Harris-Lacewell-Perry-John-Jacob-Jingleheimer-Schmidt?

Justin said...

I don't know, it could be Dr. Melissa...Schmidt. It's been a decade since I was in her classroom, and they all look the same anyway. Hard to tell.

antonello said...

He looks like a pompous, contemptuous despot. Our rulers have made a deity in their image. It's as if someone had read "Ozymandias" and was oblivious to the irony.

John Kindley said...

I've read the sermon which was supposedly inaccurately paraphrased on the monument, and I have to say I don't think the paraphrase is inaccurate. He wanted to be great. He wanted to be first. It's an instinct we all have, he said, the "drum major instinct." People are saying that the conditional "if you want to say that I was a drum major" is critical and that leaving it out distorts what he meant when he said "say that I was a drum major for justice," etc., but it's clear from the sermon he believed he was indeed a "drum major." It's also clear from the sermon that being a "drum major" is in itself kind of like being a fool. But it's also clear from the sermon he believed that he'd been a drum major "for justice, peace and righteousness." There was arrogance, if you want to call it that, in the sermon. And this is the problem people have with the paraphrase on the monument, that it makes him sound arrogant. Arguably, there was also humility in calling himself a drum major. He wanted to be thought of as great, he admitted. Perhaps the nuances, if there are any, will be missed by people reading the monument as is, and the inscription as is will strike them as odd and perplexing. But perhaps the perplexity will lead people to read the sermon itself, which would be a good thing. In any event, you've got King himself saying this is what he hopes people will say about him after he's dead.

Leonard said...

I don't think Washington is an ugly city -- too much money flows to be really ugly. (Detroit, anyone?) However, the MLK certainly is horrid: ugly, stupid, bombastic, grandiose, and wildly inappropriate for its subject. A debased culture brings forth debased art, and this is particularly visible in a culture's religious shrines. I hate the Lincoln, too, but you cannot fault it for being ugly or a nasty design -- it achieves what it sets out to achieve: the deification of the man.

Leonard said...

John, that was well said.

Anonymous said...

leonard, what's the iq requirement for civil rights leader?

oh yeah, and stoning the prophets & then building their monuments.

rob payne said...

All those symbols of power in D.C. are absurd. Big impressive symbols with Corinthian columns and big heroic statues, it just gives me goose bumps. One thing we know is they will never put up a statue of Malcolm X, it is the will of Landru. Malcolm X wasn’t a “safe” Black man. Next up - a statue of Bob Hope holding a watermelon.

NutellaonToast said...

They fucking froze him in carbonite. I knew it all along.

Anonymous said...

Dear Yinz,

I find it amusing that the memorial is so strikingly white.

Cynically yours,

Rocky Rococo
Archvillain

Michael Smith said...

Once again Monsieur & I are resonating to the same pitch:

http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org/2011/10/poor_dr_king.html

There is a Democratic Party think-tank or foundation or something called the Drum Major Institute, which derives its name from the contested passage.

Anonymous said...

i live in d.c. metro area.

riding by the pentagon every day...the worst architectural monstrosity & jives w/the pentagrams & phalloi all over d.c.
nuke the site from orbit. it's the only way to be sure.

Anonymous said...

Tebow!

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

Considering the penultimate post ("Logans' Done") and the tiresome circular firing squad it generated among the usual suspects, it is hard to believe that I am the first to realize that the only appropriate response to THIS post is to say that if the dumb mofo's only had 15-20 points more IQ, they would have realized they had to make the fucking plaque base larger ...

Anonymous said...

The memorials (and the federal government for that matter) does not equal the city. If DC were a state, it would be the only predominately black state in the union. This city has art, culture, and -- for all its many flaws -- has a community willing to stand up to power much more than Pittsburgh ever did.

Anonymous said...

"If DC were a state, it would be the only predominately black state in the union."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Washington,_D.C.

mistah charley, ph.d. said...

on another topic - has m'sieur noticed the tv shows combining live pop music (Justin Bieber, Styx) with ice dancing?

IOZ said...

The manor house does not equal the plantation.

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

"The manor house does not equal the plantation."

The reverse-snobbism of the "field-nigger", I suppose?

Solar Hero said...

Dudes, even better: the creator of the statue is a Chinaman!

lucid said...

Malcolm X wasn’t a “safe” Black man.

Neither was King. Alas, in the revisionist history that has occurred since his murder the fact that he railed tirelessly against American empire has been completely obscured from view.

IOZ said...

This isn't the guy who built the railroads, Solar.

Anonymous said...

Lenny. Detroit is ugly??? I guess yr not into ruin porn but it's all the rage nowadayzzz

Anonymous said...

Lenny. Detroit is ugly??? I guess yr not into ruin porn but it's all the rage nowadayzzz

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

lucid - but it wasn't his opposition to the V-war that got him killed - it was his growing realization (and enunciation) of the fact that it's class, not race.

This was the heresy for which he paid with his life - remember that the success of all Southern commercial enterprise fundamentally rests on keping whites convinced that they're not blacks ...

lucid said...

EL - I consider war & economic policy to be the conjoined twins of empire - so did King.

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

Lucid - yeah - I take your point, particularly since this guy:

http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/

felt the same way ...

rob payne said...

Lucid and EL- Agreed King was aware of much more than most Americans but here in the land of Oz believing in false history is as good as fact. Considering King’s view of the evil empire it’s weird that we see his statue in D.C., it’s a tribute to how Americans live in a fantasy world of their own invention.

Jack Crow said...

Rob,

I think the statue is part of the propaganda of false history.

A white washed King, and all.

rob payne said...

Hi Jack,

That's exactly the way I see it.

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

speakin' of whitewashing history, the Washington Monument is a tribute to a guy whose first official use of "US" troops was to put down a domestic (Shay Whiskey) rebellion, a tradition honored by MacArthur when early in his career, he so dashingly rode down the Bonus Marchers ...

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

not sure if my history's correct, but my point IS

... it's like that candidate's lie that wasn't a lie because his press corps told the press it was a lie in advance ...

Eerily Lackadaisical said...

And meanwhile - not one word - not one word from M'sieur Whitebread - about Michigan's emergency manager law ...

Racism is deep, my friends - very very deep ...

Brian M said...

While the monumental core is certainly ugly (and many cities have monumental core that shout fascist values), Washington's neighborhoods are certainly not always "ugly". Beautiful parks, too. Do you really think Georgetown is uglier than, say, the hideous plastic mansions of Beverly Hills?