“Will you be the generation that sat on the sidelines and watched as candidate after candidate comes up, and the national media takes their whack at them to try to destroy them in every way possible, as they’ve done with every single Republican candidate, and as they will between now the election? Will you sit on the sidelines and say, 'Boy, that’s not fair,’ or will you stand up and fight for freedom?”I like that Rick casts this in world-historical terms, like: it is the generational struggle of those now living to stop the media from taking whacks at Republican candidates in an overstuffed primary contest. I am going to start using this formulation at home, I think. "Honey, will you be the generation that sat on the sidelines while I folded all of this laundry? Will you complain that I mixed your vintage tees with polo shirts? Or will you come over here and fold it yourself?" But voters love to be hectored about this sort of thing; it gets their essential juices flowing. Well, shit, if fighting for freedom involves hauling my ass down to the precinct and yanking a lever, you can call me Che, or Edmund Burke, or Joan of Arc, or whomever. The essential derangement of democratic systems comes alive every campaign, wherein participation in the accepted, prescribed, normative civic forums is cast as a revolutionary act. Obviously the Oh, Brother campaign did just the same back in its preadministrative phase, and I expect them to pull it out again.
-LA Times
It is a little sillier, if only a little, coming from the supposed conservative candidate, which only comments once more on the tragicomedy of the whole American political taxonomy. Our conservatives may or may not be totally atavistic, but they do proclaim allegiance to a certain revolutionary creed. They say they despise and abhor all the existing institutions of government and wish to through their Dr. Scholls into the machinery. Meanwhile, the liberals defend all the state's traditional institutions, which they claim to have erected with nothing much more than gumption, a fiat currency, and their very own wartime dictator, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Thus does every worm, um, turn; the agents of so-called progress, having built their society, become with the swift passage of years the conservative defenders of it, and the former conservatives become the prophets bringing a new gospel, even if it harkens ever back into some Edenic past.
None of them are sincere, of course; Rick Santorum no more wants to destroy the institutions of American state capitalism than Barack Obama--this restaurant may be getting lousier and lousier reviews, but it's still making money for the owners and not yet fit for an accidental grease fire ifyaknowhadahmean. So there's that. I've said it before and will again: I truly do admire the genius of our system of superficial consensualism, a system whereby we are forever assenting to our present circumstances in the belief that we have any option to do otherwise.
39 comments:
Will you sit on the sidelines and say, 'Boy, that’s not fair,’ or will you stand up and fight for freedom?”
I'd love to kill someone fighting for freedom.
See, I'd like to free someone for KILLDOM!
"accidental grease fire ifyaknowhadahmean"
Jewish lightning!
No one whines about fairness like a loser. Looking forward to Romney and Obama snickering over healthcare in the summer debates.
cold heart , snickering ?
,
@11:28 - True story: in the small town where I grew up, the fire chief was known as a bit of an amateur wit. So one day there was a suspicious fire at a local dry cleaner. Asked by the local daily if he had any idea what had caused the blaze, the chief said, "There are three possibilities. It was either a fluorescent light on the second floor, an incandescent light on the first floor, or an Israelite in the basement."
Trying to destroy the Republican candidates "in every way possible" = paying snarky pundits to complain about you on the air.
Do those sadistic bastards at Time-Warner possess no humanity?
my response this morning by mail .. when davidly asked about what i did on my day of birth ../ again .. . i said "thank you davidly ..i'm going about in the street today ,between rain drops .. in to cafes ..looking for candles to blow out .. ,trip
Fighting for the freedom to not be googled bombed into comical humiliation! Who will join me?!?!?!
really though, the amazing thing here is the jump from complaining about being called names to assembling a band of freedom fighters. it's just soooo good.
WE MUST FIGHT ON!
i hope he brings back Twisted Sister for his campaign theme music. Dee Snider, score writer for alienation.
We should all start emailing Yo Mama jokes to Santorum and see how long it takes before he complains about a high tech lynching.
Santorum - the next step in evolution to a cyclops...
Speaking of Santorum, for those of you in New York, both of my bands are putting on a Lebowski Fest on March 2nd.
You have got to buck up man! You cannot drag this negative energy into the tournament!
While I agree that dudes & elections are bad,
through their Dr. Scholls
&
all the states traditional institutions
are fundamentally at odds with human nature & anarchy, as I conceive them.
" in the belief that we have any option to do otherwise."
sb:
" in the belief that we have an option to do otherwise."
Think of it this way:
The sentence:
"I don't believe we have any option to do otherwise"
sounds fine, because any's need for an associated negation is fulfilled.
But the sentence:
"I believe we have any option to do otherwise"
sounds odd, although it can be tortured to mean that we have lots of different options.
This is the same matter that's tied up in the trend over the past few decades to use "any more" without a negative, which to this ear, is horrendous. It's fine to say:
"The milk train doesn't stop here anymore"
but it makes no sense to say:
"The milk train stops here any more",
in the sense of "still stops here".
Hey EL; this is not Garrison Keillor's blog. We ain't got no good English here.
nonny@245 -
that's OK - I'll make up for the lack, cause I'm a ....
Lin-tellectual ...
looking back from the first syllable .. , oh ..i don't know .. i find eerily amusing .. , he fits in at some odd angling nicely here .. . / and 'arka as well .. keep up the ramble ... i try to look in and read just a little when i can.. .
that's right Anne - it's you, me, and Arka, just like D'Artagnan, Constance Bonacieux, and Athos, fighting a desperate and lonely fight against the Cardinal (take your pick), Milady (Nutella) and her veritable flotilla of Feltons (all the nonny's that want to peck us to death like ducks ) ...
E.L.: I'm with you on the ear grating nature of language's evolution, but isn't the example you cite acceptable on account of its subjunctivitudinheital nature?
You see, this is why I am for Bo Ramney. It's more revolutionary than simply one or the other.
davidly@4:37
I'm such a woos - would you believe I actually Googled that word on the off-chance you weren't pulling my chain ?
i'm starting to wonder now if it was lucid that pulled that lebowski stunt on my street here last time i-oz took a long holiday , it's a good thing that i'm not paranoid and have no magical thinking .. .,she thought as she peeled the cucumber .. .
anne - one would have thought that a woman of your refinement and discernment would know better than to mention "peeling a cucumber" after all the recent discussion about radfems ... the very phrase makes me think of spancels ...
E.L.
Portmanatee aside, I was serious about it's subjunctive tone, though I suppose it might be a stretch:
"We don't have any option."
"As if we had any option."
"..in the belief that we have any option to do otherwise."
At any rate, "an" works with any of them;-D
Bo Ramney '12
its
worth noting eerily . ..i sit up on a pedestal while peeling
another thought fitting for here .. ..of my sitting up on this stool here while justin's naked body was standing bent over my stove making dinner last spring , rad fem too ..boo
davidly -
Your second "as if" example actually seems OK to my ear, although the third still gives me a twinge. An old-guard generative semanticist like LakoffTheAsshole would have said that the better acceptability of the "as if" example stems from the fact that its semantic deep structure is something like:
"as if it weren't the case that we don't have any option"
where the negative support for any is overtly present in the lower final clause.
Anyway - you're right - the issue is more cloudy than I made it out to be ...
.. . oh.. just remembering this .. from the end near of the diving into post .. ioz ..of your fro ..lets talk fros .. anne has a lovely one .. the little prince was really a girl and my hair is a tumble weed .. to go with my fair ..too fair ..
sitting around in a coffee house meeting here..., and someone started reading aloud a piece of writing on how people with curly hair were better in bed than those with fine straight hair .. . we all talked and laughed about this for more than a few hours, in the middle of this i crossed the street and went up to my flat to get a photo ... and then quietly came back and held it up and said i win.. . , no one could see it coming .. i tie it with cotton when i come out of the shower .. , so i don't fall over walking ..feeling like a lolli ..
Anne, I assure you it wasn't me. This is first foray into lebowski-ism.
WOLVERINES!
Are these the pedants, Walter?
We should all start emailing Yo Mama jokes to Santorum and see how long it takes before he complains about a high tech lynching.
Yell "Happy holidays" or "Season's greetings" to him around Christmas time and he'd probably writhe like a salted slug. He'd be a desiccated little poo of pietism. Xmas marks the spot.
Are these the pedants, Walter?
No, Happy, these men are pretentious, there's nothing to be afraid of.
Guilty as charged; derailing yet another thread about...
Wut wuz it about? Oh yeah:
Get out the Revolution
Rock the Revolution
Bo Ramney '12
Post a Comment