So the plan to prevent terrorists from using planes to attack one of Europe's most densely populated urban areas is to shoot down planes over one of Europe's most densely populated urban areas. Actually, the plan is to employ snipers to shoot the pilots of planes over one of Europe's most densely populated urban areas, precisely the sort of antic triaging of potentially disastrous consequences that only a dedicated security bureaucracy could dream up, a plan to get the patient onto the operating table faster by crashing the ambulance through the doors into the waiting room.
This is the logical conclusion of our ever-escalating investment in security theater; the opera ends and Nabucco, still wielding his sword, jumps into the audience and starts beheading dowagers. When returning from Spain recently, as I was herded along with a thousand other weary, creaking travelers through Philadelphia's Minoan-era labyrinth of an international arrivals gate, it occurred to me that we now have to pass through security in order to get to security, and I imagined a Kafka pastiche, an infinite regression of security wherein some poor Herr waits indefinitely in series of security lines that lead only to the next layer of security.
The Olympics, or the airlines, or the G20, or whatever--all of the essential and inessential functions and events of our society have come to serve a singular purpose, which is to justify an elaborate system of gates and human backflow preventers. The whole thing is strangely religious, really, all things on this earth, however small or large, important or irrelevant, testifying if viewed by the righteous and devout to the eternal and ubiquitous glory of a god . . . only in this case the god is not a cloud-borne old man or graceful Shiva tapping out the passage of universal time on his drum, but rather a malfunctioning scatter X-ray machine; in this universe, Pilgrims don't so much journey to Jerusalem or the Holy See as await a travel visa that will never be issued because none exist; there is a metal detector at the entrance to the symbolic maze on its cathedral floor.
Having seen from the safe distance of an involved non-participant the planning that went into shutting down Pittsburgh for the G20 a while back, I can report firsthand the positive joy the people charged with erecting security take in it. I am not stretching the religious metaphor. These are fundamentally ecstatics, transported by temporary barriers, enraptured by color-coded credentials. Everyone likes to blame this on terrorism, or let's say instead on an "overreaction" to terrorism, but terrorism, like, I don't know, the Virgin Birth, is just a neat bit of retconning added to make a garbled backstory both more coherent and more poetic. It would be a comfort if these people were merely evil; instead, they're all quite mad.
31 comments:
http://www.sfsite.com/~silverag/gather.html
Not only is it a classic and a great read, M'sieur, but it goes precisely to the point you're making about religion lurking in seemingly secular activities
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2012/04/olympics-2012-a-bruce-schneier.html
Exacting power over others always makes a certain type happy.
Eventually, the Olympics will replace the marathon with a true test of endurance, entrance to a sports venue.
We're all mad here.
in this case the god is... a malfunctioning scatter X-ray machine
No. The god is the state. The Lord promises heaven; the state promises your safety. As Chesterton said: when people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing -- they believe in anything. And really, I think worshiping the state is far more practical than other post-Christian crypto-religions. If you worship the state, you are a normal American whom other Americans will confidently grant power; whereas if you worship some other idol, you are a nut or crank or whatever and cannot have any significant power. Compare the press's reaction to Obama (fanatical state worshiper) to Romney (tepid state worshiper), as compared to Ron Paul (Constitution worshiper -- heretic) or Santorum (Jesus worshiper -- nut).
Chesterton to Shaw:
Looking at you Shaw, one would think there was a famine in England.
Shaw to Chesterton:
And looking at you, Chesterton, one would think you were the cause of it.
Leonard clearly goes with Caesar on this one:
Give me men about me that sleep a' nights. Yon Cassius has a lean and hungry look ...
Concur utterly.
I remember my father and I trying to guess the next enemy after the fall of the USSR, but neither of us were fogged enough to imagine a perpetual war against violence. Humanity is clearly in way over its simian head and sinking deeper fast.
They irradiate you for your own good
so? dudes gotta work. you want us to watch the stillers in prime time on standard def? c'mon babe.
if you see something say something.
I left the US of Arrrghh about 9 years ago. It was an evening flight out of Newark rich with serendipitous symbolism. We were somewhere out over the Atlantic when the first cruise missiles slammed into Baghdad, but of course that was after all the pre-flight security checks when they confiscated my wife's favorite creams, a pair of mini-scissors from my daughter and my classic fingernail clippers.
During the pre-flight formalities the hostess came by and designated a nearby seat for a vegetarian meal by plunging a flag attached spike about the size of a knitting needle into the backrest.
It was a wonderful omen.
No argument here that the prospect of some sort of organized terrorist attack on a London Olympics is for the most part paranoid conjecture. After all, the chances can't be higher than 49%. Meanwhile, the authorities should certainly seek a less obtrusive way to walk that gossamer line between what security experts in the general public consider ill-advised overpreparation, and failing to connect the dots.
Chesterton vs Shaw rules! Full on Lakers & Celtics!
Paul -
If you liked the Chesterton/Shaw Shaw exchange, then I'm sure you'll like the classic Pitt/Walpole exchange (if you don't already know it):
Pitt (or Walpole - I forget which):
You, sir, will either die on the gallows or of some unspeakable disease.
Walpole (or Pitt - again, I forget)
That depends, sir, on whether I embrace your policies or your mistress.
Puts what passes for "witty insults" chez IOZ to shame, don't you thinK?
Well I mean it's great stuff, but IOZ is no slouch. I do read the old dudes, FIR REALl, & my considered opinion is that IOZ is no slouch.
What annoys me is when people tout that Charles Pierce guy as some kind of modern Johnson-Swift-Shaw-etc, because he's actually a perfect representative of the tin-eared verbal impotence that's all too common today.
No no, Paul - you misunderstood me.
M'sieur (IOZ) is a master - almost anachronistically so, given the current dismal level of verbal performance which you note.
It's the attempts at "witty insults" by the "lumpen" segments of his commentariat that I find pitiful.
In any event, thank you again for "raining on the Rand parade" a post ago ... it's absolutely ludicrous that she's taken seriously at all.
eagles come and go
to someplace much higher
E.L.---OK sorry to have so completely misunderstood---I have a hard time keeping track of who's who around here. You & several of the other regulars seem way cool; a couple seem stupid & hostile, one seems molto pazzo, Jesu Maria shield her well... Our host does indeed have the ability to do with modern, colloqial-internet English what the old dudes did with their English, and that is something.
I hope this right now is the high water mark for taking Rand seriously. I hope the wave towers because it's about to break.
"better to live under robber barons ...", no?
TDS
What does the title mean? It is in a language other than English.
¿Qué significa el título? Se encuentra en un idioma distinto al español.
es IOZ--se fue a espana, y decidio que se veria inteligente a escribir espanol durante un poco de tiempo.
It'll probably pass. (Leones, ya sabes.)
"This is the logical conclusion of our ever-escalating investment in security theater; the opera ends and Nabucco, still wielding his sword, jumps into the audience and starts beheading dowagers."
Five stars!
Thats the stuff you beautiful bastard! Ride the lightning...
It's Italian you loons.
Seriously, I come here for witty banter and snide arguments, but the peanut gallery can't even distinguish Spanish from Italian. Oy, vey!
Tedthejackal: can your Dad and I have coffee some day? When I suggested to my friends that the answer to 911 was basically a 1984 sequel (we were always at war with Oceania...) and what we really needed was a great PR campaign; I may as well been a cyclops and speaking in tongues.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N53t1Gy7wP0
dalle 06:15 alla fine
TDS
As to the title, yeah how much did the Yuropean burgeois love themsalves some jews...
...
... well at least until those pesky monarchs and aristocracy were dealt with, after which the previously semiangelic jews sprouted hoofs'n'horns and it was all Affaire Dreyfus and Kristallnachts all the way.
TDS
Ok its italian but what does it mean.
Post a Comment